User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page80
original Historical progression of records
[edit]Number of award (categories) each year
make a zebra stripe
select colors --- | style="background-color:#FFFF99 | .
calculate time --- {{Years ago|1959}} ............. 65 --- MAYORS --- see Talk Page for this Sand Box
fix sorting ability
re format the whole set up?
Template - Historical progression of records
re format ???
{{Years ago|1959}} ............. 65 ............
sorting ability
re arrange Template - Historical progression of records
zebra stripes
sorting ability
column width
CONFIRM accuracy !!!!!!!!!!!!!
zebra stripes
sorting ability
column width
double check links / also accuracy
zebra stripes
sorting ability
column width
double check links / also accuracy
zebra stripes - correct colors --- Periwinkle (color) ... color code ... #CCCCFF --- complementary color (light yellow) ... color code ... #FFFFCC
sorting ability
column width
double check links / also accuracy
cross check accuracy against the "real" chart
use of BOLD text
use of " BIG " text
rwo span colspan the 1st Awards Sunrise and 7th Heaven
- Analogous Color Scheme
zebra stripes - correct colors --- Periwinkle (color) ... color code ... #CCCCFF --- analogous color (light periwinkle) ... color code ... #EDEDFF
col span and row span for ORIGINAL setting of record at 1st Awards
Article
[edit]List of films with the most Academy Awards per ceremony
Historical progression of films receiving a record number of Academy Award nominations
[edit]Record Number of Nominations |
Film Title | Achievement | Academy Awards Season | Duration of Record | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceremony | Year in Film | ||||
5 nominations | 7th Heaven | Set Record | 1st | 1927–1928 | 2 years |
In Old Arizona | Tied Record | 2nd | 1928–1929 | ||
The Patriot | |||||
6 nominations | The Love Parade | Broke Record | 3rd | 1929–1930 | 1 year |
7 nominations | Cimarron | Broke Record | 4th | 1930–1931 | 4 years |
8 nominations | Mutiny on the Bounty | Broke Record | 8th | 1935 | 2 years |
10 nominations | The Life of Emile Zola | Broke Record | 10th | 1937 | 2 years |
13 nominations | Gone with the Wind | Broke Record | 12th | 1939 | 11 years |
14 nominations | All About Eve | Broke Record | 23rd | 1950 | 73 years |
Titanic | Tied Record | 70th | 1997 | ||
La La Land | Tied Record | 89th | 2016 |
Historical progression of films receiving a record number of Academy Awards
[edit]Record Number of Awards |
Film Title | Achievement | Academy Awards Season | Duration of Record | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceremony | Year in Film | ||||
3 awards | 7th Heaven | Set Record | 1st | 1927–1928 | 6 years |
Sunrise | |||||
Cimarron | Tied Record | 4th | 1930–1931 | ||
Cavalcade | Tied Record | 6th | 1932–1933 | ||
5 awards | It Happened One Night | Broke Record | 7th | 1934 | 5 years |
8 awards | Gone with the Wind | Broke Record | 12th | 1939 | 19 years |
From Here to Eternity | Tied Record | 26th | 1953 | ||
On the Waterfront | Tied Record | 27th | 1954 | ||
9 awards | Gigi | Broke Record | 31st | 1958 | 1 year |
11 awards | Ben-Hur | Broke Record | 32nd | 1959 | 64 years |
Titanic | Tied Record | 70th | 1997 | ||
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | Tied Record | 76th | 2003 |
List of films receiving the most Academy Awards---- organizing the TOTAL row at the BOTTOM
[edit]Academy Awards Season | Film Title | Best Picture | Awards | Nominations | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceremony | Year in Film | Winner | Nominee | ||||
32nd | 1959 | Ben-Hur | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 12 | |
70th | 1997 | Titanic | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 14 | |
76th | 2003 | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 11 | |
3 Ceremonies |
3 Years in Film |
3 Film Titles |
3 Winners |
3 Nominees |
33 Awards |
37 Nominations |
Column Totals |
List of films receiving the most Academy Awards
[edit]Academy Awards Season | Film Title | Best Picture | Awards | Nominations | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceremony | Year in Film | Winner | Nominee | ||||
32nd | 1959 | Ben-Hur | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 12 | |
70th | 1997 | Titanic | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 14 | |
76th | 2003 | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 11 | |
3 Ceremonies | 3 Years in Film | 3 Film Titles | 3 Winners | 3 Nominees | 33 Awards | 37 Nominations | Column Totals |
List of films receiving the most Academy Awards
[edit]Academy Awards Season | Film Title | Best Picture | Awards | Nominations | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceremony | Year in Film | Winner | Nominee | ||||
32nd | 1959 | Ben-Hur | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 12 | |
70th | 1997 | Titanic | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 14 | |
76th | 2003 | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 11 |
List of films receiving the most Academy Awards
[edit]Academy Awards Season | Film Title | Best Picture | Awards | Nominations | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceremony | Year in Film | Winner | Nominee | ||||
32nd | 1959 | Ben-Hur | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 12 | |
70th | 1997 | Titanic | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 14 | |
76th | 2003 | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | ✓ | ✓ | 11 | 11 | |
Total | 3 | 3 | 33 | 37 | Column Totals |
Difference between "Best Picture" and "Unique Artistic" at FIRST ceremony
[edit]Gallery
[edit]-
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans won the Academy Award for Best Unique and Artistic Picture, the only year that such a prize was awarded. The prize was intended to honor prestige art films separately from "commercial fare".Decherney, Peter (August 14, 2012). "Hollywood and the Culture Elite: How the Movies Became American". Columbia University Press – via Google Books.
Color websites
[edit][1] ... color combo
[2] ... shades nuancer - lighter / darker (French web site)
[3] ... how-to-select-perfectly-matching-color-combinations
[4] ... color calculator
[5] ... color code hex
[6] ... color hexa
[7] ... hex color
[8] ... color calculator
[9] ... color harmonies: Hulk wears purple pants
[10] ... color schemer
[11] ... flex color palette
[12] ... colour calculator
[13] ... color schemes
[14] ... newton
[15] ... color relationships creating color harmony
[16] ... color wizard
What is the proper format for the "line break" command?
[edit]Can someone please explain to me the difference in the following three commands? What is each one supposed to do, or supposed to be used for? Thanks.
- <br> (just the two letters "b" and "r")
- </br> (the two letters with a slash/virgule before them)
- <br/> (the two letters with a slash/virgule after them)
Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- The all do the same thing. (See here for a discussion.) RJFJR (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, what he said. I will only add that the second form is clearly malformed and shouldn't be used (MediaWiki knows that it's wrong but seems to do the right thing anyway).
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- WP:LINEBREAK says the preferred form is
<br />
. Omitting the slash has the additional downside that it breaks syntax highlighting. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- WP:LINEBREAK says the preferred form is
- Is there any difference between <br/> and <br />? The first one does not have a space between the letter "r" and the slash. The second one does have a space between the letter "r" and the slash. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- See WP:LINEBREAK. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- This goes back in HTML history a bit since <br> used to be the standard. Then came along an HTML standard that said all tags should have a closing /. To anyone not in the web design world, and even for some in that world, it's a pedantic difference. You can just use <br /> and not worry. Dismas|(talk) 01:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- See WP:LINEBREAK. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Is there any difference between <br/> and <br />? The first one does not have a space between the letter "r" and the slash. The second one does have a space between the letter "r" and the slash. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, all. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
<br />
List of elements
[edit]List of elements - a table with the sort as a separate row
Audie Murphy honors and awards - the first row is the "title" of the chart
1990 NFL season - a "white" table with no borders
Sorting rows in a table: What does this code do?
[edit]Please see this article: List of chemical elements. The relevant computer code in List of elements is as follows:
|-
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-style="display:none;"
| −999 || !a || !a || !a || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999
|-
What is all that business with the -999 values and the !a notations? What does that do? What is that supposed to do? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Joseph A. Spadaro: Looks like it is (or was) to do with sorting, according to the diff. — crh 23 (Talk) 16:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)@Joseph A. Spadaro: See Help:Sorting#Forcing proper sort type and positioning rows with a hidden sort key - NQ (talk) 17:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. But, sorry, I still don't understand. I know that it has some relationship to the whole sorting process. Beyond that, I still don't understand what it is or what it's doing. Can someone clarify in plain English? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- The row is not displayed due to
style="display:none;"
. It was added to control whether columns are sorted alphabetically or numerically so you can just ignore it if there are no sorting problems. "10" comes before "5" in alphabetic sorting because it compares one character at a time and "1" comes before "5". In numerical sorting "5" should come before "10". The table sorting software and how it determines sort method for a column has changed several times. I'm not sure the code is needed today but it seems harmless to leave it in. If it's removed then there may be a risk that a column with numbers will start sorting alphabetically. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- The row is not displayed due to
- Thanks. But, sorry, I still don't understand. I know that it has some relationship to the whole sorting process. Beyond that, I still don't understand what it is or what it's doing. Can someone clarify in plain English? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. So, in other words: the columns with a -999 notation are telling the software to sort this column numerically; and the columns with a !a notation are telling the software to sort this column alphabetically. Is that what's happening? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that's basically what was happening but it's not the best or most reliable system with the current sorting software. TheDJ has used a better system in [17]. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. So, in other words: the columns with a -999 notation are telling the software to sort this column numerically; and the columns with a !a notation are telling the software to sort this column alphabetically. Is that what's happening? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- I changed this to use the more understandable methodology of using data-sort-type. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 06:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, all. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)