User talk:Jtsstl
|
Welcome to Wikipedia! | ||
|
Welcome! My name is Cindamuse, and I'm an Online Ambassador. We are a group of experienced Wikipedians who offer assistance, support, and mentorship for newcomers. You don't need to read anything; you can just jump right in and try to improve Wikipedia. If you need help, you can talk with us right now, or you can leave me a message on my user talk page. Have fun! ~~
| ||
|
Editing cheatsheet |
Summary of policies and guidelines | |
|
Find the page for your course |
Starting an article | |
|
Chat with us: Ask a question on the classroom IRC channel or on the regular help chat | ||
Hi, Jtsstl. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
MTHarden (talk) 21:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jtsstle. I like your group name. I'm sorry to hear that you are sick and I hope that you feel better.Nicolasa11 (talk) 03:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Jtssle. I believe that I am supposed to be talking to you for the assignment so hi, how's it goin?
[edit]Dsylve44 (talk) 00:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Week 3
[edit]Great work on the critiqued, linked correctly, and even though you forgot to sign it the first time, you came back later to sign it so that's good. Scores will be posted to Moodle. --MTHarden (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
KESigmund Revision
[edit]The way I see it, you went above and beyond with this portion of the project. We only needed to a sentence or so, but you went and added what looks to be an entire paragraph. I checked out your source and it seemed like a bunch of mumbo jumbo there, but what you have written very easily explains the testing at hand. So it is in a form that is still scientific enough to be in the topic, but anyone can easily understand it. Very wonderful job--KESigmund13 (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
KESigmund Article
[edit]You were very right about the post needing to be put on the talk page of the article. It looks like I too have bad directions skills or I at least lost my ability to read at the time. I'm going to copy and past my critique then to the talk page of the article so that's correct. Thanks for the heads up! KESigmund13 (talk) 22:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)