User talk:JulieKB1953

November 2020

Hello JulieKB1953. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JulieKB1953. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JulieKB1953|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 16:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are editing about people who were once your clients, it would still fall under conflict of interest which you should disclose(though are not required to by the Terms of Use). Current clients do fall under the paid editing policy. 331dot (talk) 16:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I update articles on several old or new clients, I would list my employer but who would I list as my client? JulieKB1953 (talk) 17 November 2020 (UTC)

I think that for old/former clients, it's enough to just say that the person used to be your client. No need to say any more in that case, from what I understand. For current clients, you would list who is paying you(your employer) and for whom the edit is for(your client). You would replace the words "Insertname" with the name of the client. 331dot (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review my user page? I want to make sure I am doing correctly. When I edit or submit an article I would include that on the article? JulieKB1953 (talk) 17:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I've fixed your user page so the notice is correct. You don't need to include the declaration on the draft itself, but on the talk page for the draft. If you're using a computer as opposed to a phone, there should be a "talk" tab at the top of any draft you create, that's where to do it. 331dot (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate your help. I will submit the article for publishing JulieKB1953 (talk) 17:31, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sara Bradley

Hello JulieKB1953,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sara Bradley for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexandermcnabb|Alexandermcnabb, I would like help. I believe Sara Bradley is important enough to have an article. I am not sure how to leave a message on your talk. JulieKB1953 (talk) 17:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

advice

As reviewing administrator, I deleted this article, but under a different criterion, G11, essentially advertising, not correctable with normal editing.

I see you declared paid editing on the talk p., and therefore you should not have written that article in main space to begin with, but in draftspace, and let one of the AfC reviewers check it first. DGG ( talk ) 19:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Where do I go to start the article in draft space? I was in the process of editing and adding additional references. JulieKB1953 (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi JulieKB1953! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Want to publish and edit articles on chefs, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Bradley (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Bradley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sara Bradley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JulieKB1953! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion

I see from your user page that you wrote this as a paid editor, but you declare only that you work for Estes Public Relations. You need to also declare every article you write or contributed to in a paid capacity, See WP:PAID. . My advice would be to work on articles of personal interest to you until you learn our standards. . DGG ( talk ) 18:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sara Bradley

Hello, JulieKB1953. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sara Bradley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]