Jump to content

User talk:Jumbotron88

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jumbotron88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jumbotron88 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't think I was violating any terms or misusing my Wikipedia for violent purposes. I think this block is unnecessary and really harms to core reason for editing wikipedia, which is to spread information and knowledge to everyone. I went over the reasons for blocking users on Wikipedia and I completely understand reasons as to why Users maybe blocked. I wholeheartedly agree to not pursue any future activity that would otherwise violate Wikipedia's terms and policies. I was making edits to SUNY schools and pages and had updated them with a lot of information. I am really disappointed to have my work reverted when they were cited and I had spent a lot of time on them. I don't even know who Biohack97811 is, I think there might have been a big erroneous mistake here.

Jumbotron88 (talk) 00:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.