User talk:Jupiter Europa

Fill free to leave all comments here. I'll try to respond as fast as can.

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Billy Joel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Billy Joel was changed by Jupiter Europa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907546 on 2016-11-05T02:57:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Billy Joel.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be neutral

Please be neutral. We are adding what news channels are announcing currently. If you want to change the results provide a source first and also leave a clear summary. Keivan.f^Talk 04:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, it's just that I am really nervous for what the future is going to be. Jupiter Europa (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I also live in the USA and I'm so excited as well. But please provide a link from NYT so the other users can check your claims. Currently NBC says Clinton has 209 electoral votes and right now according to the websites that I have checked Trump has 201 electoral votes. If you think that I have made a mistake you can just provide us with a link to the NYT article which supports what you said. And please don't remove sourced materials. Keivan.f^Talk 04:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Politics since 1932

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 04:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential election, 2016

What's your source for the last electoral vote going to Trump in Nebraska? CNN hasn't called it yet; what source has called it? —C.Fred (talk) 04:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: It's a new account posting unsourced material and deleting sourced material. It's not unheard of, but on this particular article on this particular day ... I don't know why they took away full protection, honestly. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 04:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please stop reverting. You seem to be violating WP:1RR. Prcc27🎃 (talk) 04:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your account appears to have been created as part of a careful plan to game the system, so I've reported you on WP:ANI. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 05:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What? Jupiter Europa (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are a new account, and almost all of your edits are to the same very topical article. This means you created your account specifically to edit that article. This is not a problem in theory, but the page is semi-protected to prevent new and unregistered users from editing it during this time. You apparently wanted to be able to edit it on election day to post "updates" (again, in theory not a problem), but you did not cite sources and edit-warred. Additionally, doing what you did to get around the semi-protection is generally seen as inappropriate. You are welcome to edit articles, even that article, once your block expires. Please use this time to familarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 08:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 07:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."