User talk:KFvdL
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, KFvdL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alexbrn (talk) 13:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Alexbrn (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Question
[edit]What's your involvement in CST please? Guy (Help!) 08:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- I’m a biomedical researcher and craniosacral therapist. KFvdL (talk) 21:26, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK, so you have a conflict of interest and you must not edit the article directly. Instead you must propose changes on Talk and abide by consensus there. Guy (Help!) 23:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Utter nonsense. There is no mention at WP:COI of health professionals, or therapists, or experts of any field prohibited editing articles related to that field, or being limited to talk pages. At Wikipedia we judge the edits, not the editor, unless there is a COI that fits one of the categories listed at WP:COI. If edits show a pattern of failing policy then there is a problem; if edits follow policy then it does not matter what your profession is. These faux 'rules' are simple bullying and fear-mongering. Happy editing2001:56A:75CE:1700:483B:732E:68E5:2CD4 (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- I am aware of it. Collecting a nice number of diffs for future action. Not interested in fighting, just showing how broken the system is. KFvdL (talk) 22:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Quacks are not health professionals. HTH, HAND. Guy (help!) 22:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Utter nonsense. There is no mention at WP:COI of health professionals, or therapists, or experts of any field prohibited editing articles related to that field, or being limited to talk pages. At Wikipedia we judge the edits, not the editor, unless there is a COI that fits one of the categories listed at WP:COI. If edits show a pattern of failing policy then there is a problem; if edits follow policy then it does not matter what your profession is. These faux 'rules' are simple bullying and fear-mongering. Happy editing2001:56A:75CE:1700:483B:732E:68E5:2CD4 (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- OK, so you have a conflict of interest and you must not edit the article directly. Instead you must propose changes on Talk and abide by consensus there. Guy (Help!) 23:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Anatomy newsletter #7
[edit]Released September 2020 · Previous newsletter
Hello WikiProject Anatomy participant! This is our seventh newsletter, documenting what's going on in WikiProject Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest.
I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.
Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
What's new
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/Anatomist_Barnstar.png/220px-Anatomist_Barnstar.png)
![]() |
new good articles since last newsletter include Epiglottis, Human nose, Pancreas, Prostate, Thymus, Trachea, T tubule, Ureter and Vagina, with Anatomical terms of location also awaiting review |
![]() |
A made-up eponymous term is used in our article that eventually makes it in to university anatomy teaching slides and a journal article |
![]() |
We reach a project goal of 150 B-class articles in July 2020, increasing by about 50% over five years, and are one good article away from our goal of 40 GAs, doubling over the last five years |
![]() |
In the real world, Terminologia Anatomica 2 and Terminologia Embryologica 2 are released ([1], [2]). Terminologia Anatomica 2 is now included in anatomy article infoboxes, and there is ongoing discussion about updating TE as well |
![]() |
A beautiful new barnstar is released ({{subst:The Anatomist Barnstar}}) |
![]() |
Portal:Anatomy receives some attention, and two related portals are deleted (vale Human body and Cranial nerve portals) |
![]() |
Some things left out from past newsletters - A large amount of redirects are created to help link plural structures, and Cerebellum ([3]) and Hippocampus ([4]) are published in Wikiversity. |
Newsletter topic: anatomy and featured articles
[edit]I have been asked to write up something introducing the Featured article (FA) process to anatomy editors, but I took a more general approach to explaining why one might want to contribute featured content and the benefits to the editor and to Wikipedia. I also tried to address some misconceptions about the FA process, and give you a guide that is somewhat specific to health content should you decide to take the dive.
A vital purpose of Featured articles is to serve as examples for new and aspiring Wikipedia editors. FAs are often uniquely comprehensive for the Internet. They showcase some of our best articles, and can enhance Wikipedia's reputation if they are maintained to standard—but in an "anyone can edit" environment, they can easily fall out of standard if not maintained. Benefits to the writer include developing collaborative partnerships and learning new skills, while improving your writing and seeing it exposed to a broader audience—all that Wikipedia is about!
Looking more specifically at WP Anatomy's featured content, the Featured media is impressive and seems to be an Anatomy Project strength. The Anatomy WikiProject has tagged 4 FAs, 1 Featured list, and 30 Featured media. Working towards upgrading and maintaining older Featured articles could be a worthwhile goal. Immune system is a 2007 FA promotion, and bringing it up to date would make a nice collaboration between WikiProject Medicine and the Anatomy WikiProject. Hippocampus is another dated promotion that is almost 50% larger than when promoted, having taken on a bit of uncited text and new text that might benefit from a tune-up.
Whether tuning up an older FA at Featured article review, or attempting a new one to be reviewed at Featured article candidates, taking the plunge can be rewarding, and I hope the advice in my essay is helpful.
You can read the essay "Achieving excellence through featured content" here.
SandyGeorgia has been a regular FA reviewer at FAC and FAR since 2006, and has participated in thousands of nominations
How can I contribute?
[edit]- Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask at our project page!
- Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
- Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
- Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there
This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WikiProject Anatomy users. To opt-out, remove your name from the mailing list
Inactive WikiProject Anatomy participant
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/Lateral_head_anatomy_detail.jpg/220px-Lateral_head_anatomy_detail.jpg)
Hi KFvdL, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed at WikiProject Anatomy as a participant, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 years.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the participant list, so that we stop spamming you with newsletters and have a better idea of who to contact for active discussions. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting here when you become active again.
Thank you, and all the best on your WikiVoyages! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)