User talk:KXF

Welcome!

Hello, KXF, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicolas Arroyo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Biddle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful addition

to Edwin Blashfield. Hope to see a lot more of you on my watch list. Oh yes, if you put something, anything, on your user page then your name will appear as a blue link rather than a red one, suggesting that you are an experienced editor of longstanding rather than someone whose every edit must be carefully scrutinized. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KXF, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi KXF! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eli Jacobs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lee Lawrie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael McKinnell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Douglas Orr may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lorado Taft may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adolph Alexander Weinman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anita Dunn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry Bacon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<ref>Thomas E. Luebke, ed. ''Civic Art: A Centennial History of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, 2013''</ref><ref>[http://www.cfa.gov/about/bios/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, KXF. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 17:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, KXF. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

References

If you are still struggling with references, please read the guidance again. The error message says "Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{Reflist}} template or a <references /> tag (see the help page)."; then read again what it says at Help:Cite errors/Cite error refs without references#Issues and resolution. Did you add either {{Reflist}} or <references />? - David Biddulph (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I added those correctly, I'll check again. Thank you. KXF (talk) 18:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

Congratulations! You have earned the

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page.
Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 20:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Harry Siddons Mowbray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to University Club

John Walker (curator) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mellon

Lee Lawrie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to St. Bartholomew's Episcopal Church

Maurice Sterne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carnegie Institute

Theodore Roszak (artist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Depression

William F. Lamb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Standard Oil Building

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William T. Aldrich.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Luebke book on the Commission of Fine Arts

I think it's wonderful that there's a new book out on the Commission of Fine Arts. The old one by Sue Kohler from 1995 was dated. However, rather than just add a reference to the book, you should cite the actual author of the chapter being cite, and a page number. First off, there are seven authors in the edited book — Lubke, William B. Bushong, Arleyn Levee, Zachary Schrag, Pamela Scott, Carroll William Westfall, Richard Guy Wilson — and I'm betting that you aren't constantly referencing Lubke's chapter. Second, someone could argue that without the page number, this is "good faith vandalism"...you like the book, want to call attention to it, but aren't actually referencing anything in the book (just guessing it's in there). Third, in some cases, the articles in question use a specific citation style of last name and page. By using a full reference and no page number in the reference citation, someone could come along and decide to delete the reference you added because it's not meeting the style guidelines. I assume you have the book (I certainly don't, and my local library isn't going to get it), and rather than rely on someone else some time down the road to add page numbers and the correct author it's probably best if you went back and added the right author's name and the right page number(s). - Tim1965 (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim1965, thanks for the comment. All the information I've added so far has come from an appendix of Commission member bios at the back of the book, which was published without attribution, rather than one of the chapters attributed to an individual author. (The authors you cite actually wrote essays; the seven chapters were written by a few members of CFA staff.) Maybe just citing the appendix, since the entries are arranged alphabetically, or the appendix name and the page number, would be sufficient - what do you think?

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peirce Anderson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peirce Anderson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William T. Aldrich concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William T. Aldrich, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William T. Aldrich

Hello KXF. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "William T. Aldrich".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William T. Aldrich}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peirce Anderson

Hello KXF. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Peirce Anderson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peirce Anderson}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, KXF. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Anne Delong (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

from: [[User:{{Kay Fanning}}|KXF]] Hi - I posted a question May 23 and see I have a reply from Anne DeLong, but I can't find my question or her reply on the Teahouse talk page or its archives. Where is the reply? My question was how to add titles to articles submitted for review, and how to select categories for articles. Thanks! KXF (talk) 13:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, KXF. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at AfC Elbert Peets was accepted

Elbert Peets, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 19:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated errors, please address

Hello, a few consistent concerns with your most recent batch of contributions:

For a bio, the person's name should be the very first words of the article, and in bold.
You're somehow submitting articles in such a way you're getting convoluted titles like "User:KXF/sandbox/Diane R. Wolf". I'm not sure why your "Submit" is moving it to such titles from your Sandbox, rather than just to Draft:Diane R. Wolf. In any case, should you see your draft end up with an odd long title, please look at the bottom of the yellow Submit box on your page, there should be a button saying "this should instead be at Draft:Diane R. Wolf". Just hit that button and approve the move and you'll be in the proper location for review.
A bunch of your articles have footnotes, but lack the {{reflist}} code at the bottom which actually lists the footnotes. Please make sure you include the References heading and said coding at the very end of the article so it will properly display your footnotes.

These errors cropped up in about a dozen recent submissions of yours, so please modify your approach just slightly to help minimize burden on the reviewers in simple format fixes. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Mitchell Kendall has been accepted

William Mitchell Kendall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LukeSurl^{t c} 22:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello, KXF. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Hudnut (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Joseph Hudnut.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zach Vega (talk to me) 09:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Diane R. Wolf was accepted

Diane R. Wolf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 15:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Borie (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Charles Borie.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zach Vega (talk to me) 14:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burnham Kelly (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Burnham Kelly.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zach Vega (talk to me) 16:56, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Charles Moore (city planner) was accepted

Charles Moore (city planner), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 00:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Burnham Kelly concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Burnham Kelly, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joseph Hudnut concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joseph Hudnut, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Charles Borie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charles Borie, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Hudnut has been accepted

Joseph Hudnut, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Borie

Hello KXF. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Charles Borie".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Charles Borie}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Burnham Kelly concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Burnham Kelly, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Burnham Kelly

Hello, KXF. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Burnham Kelly".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Mitchell Kendall (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article must be built from information found in third-party sources (newspapers, magazines) that are independent of the subject of the article. Those sources must be referenced in-line with the text they support. No un-referenced material is allowed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Mitchell Kendall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KXF. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William Mitchell Kendall

Hello, KXF. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "William Mitchell Kendall".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KXF. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Augustus Saint-Gaudens

When you do an edit such as you just did at Augustus Saint-Gaudens it is usually expected that you'll include a reference for where you got the information. Fortunately it is not too late to do it. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, KXF. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]