User talk:Kamal091

Welcome!

Hello, Kamal091, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 115ash^→(☏) 09:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Jeraphine Gryphon. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Freelancer, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Link building. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.

Please do not replace dead links in articles with links to your own blog. If you believe that the blog is useful as a source you can bring it up at the Reliable sources noticeboard which is frequented by editors who are experienced in identifying reliable sources. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding replacing Link

Hey, i just made a minor change in the link, i just changes the syntax as the link wasnt displaying properly and was portraying an error on google results. Its a page on unemployment, and i only gathered and shared the information for views of economist on my blog https://www.frisklancer.com/blog/2015/06/08/how-governments-handle-increasing-unemployment/ I think the link does equate the necessary amount and context of the paragraph. And also, the former link was assumed as a dead link. So that's why i tried to replace it with some good information. Correct me if i am wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamal091 (talk • contribs) 05:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're wrong. Stop trying to spam your blog on Wikipedia, if I see it inserted anywhere here one more time I will personally go and request for the link to be blacklisted from Wikipedia.

In Unemployment, the reference you fixed was previously added by an IP editor (who might've been you, I don't know) who replaced a "citation needed" tag. In Freelancer you also replaced a citation needed tag with your link. Now, after having been warned about spamming you still go ahead and add your link to another article, Link building, this time replacing an existing reference. Yes the existing reference was marked as a "dead link" but that's not an excuse to add spam. That previous reference was to a book published by John Wiley & Sons, just because the link was broken doesn't meant that the reference was invalid. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]