User talk:Keitsist

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lake Opeta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kumi and Pokot

List of rivers of Uganda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Narus River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaabong in Uganda location map overlay.svg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kaabong in Uganda location map overlay.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kidepo in Uganda location map overlay.svg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kidepo in Uganda location map overlay.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Congo, Macedonia and Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Uganda Game and Fisheries Department Logo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uganda Game and Fisheries Department Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bulwersator, thank you for your generous contribution to making Wikipedia a more valuable resource. This concern may be correct but it is specious. The Template:Non-free use rationale logo is applicable in this case. If you would are interested in applying your charitably donated time reviewing copyright concerns more productively in future, please refer to the documentation of this template for use with similar content. Keitsist (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Elkhorn Slough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Salinas River

Fort Patiko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Gordon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token f0955280a7d0b2a4d4bcd559c5f9ac3a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Speedy deletion nomination of Novomer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Novomer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vacation9 (talk) 16:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Api Elephant Domestication Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Leopold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teknekron Corporation

Hello Keitsist,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Teknekron Corporation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 00:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for minding my userpage Jschnur (talk) 22:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 Central African Republic rebellion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RPG

Convention of Patriots for Justice and Peace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Damara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CAR rebellion

I would appreciate if you keep all the relevant discussion on the talk page for the article in question. In addition, please keep in mind I will notify administrators and any merge will be voted upon. Unless you present your case in full, I am not even going to waste time in discussing it. I think I made my point clear - comparing the two conflicts does not work in your favor - not only has one of the groups changed sides (at least one), there is also a splinter cell within that group, the UN forces are missing, France and the US refused help this time around, and so on and so on. The fact that the two conflicts are interconnected, i.e. one is a consequence of the other, does NOT warrant as merge of the article. You can certainly go ahead and petition for a summary article with ALL the coup d'etat since the 60s, but other than, I think you have no point. So in your reply, please, I'd like to see actual evidence of what you're saying, and keep the smiley faces to yourself. Remember that WP is a combined effort, not a do-as-you-please adventure... Skycycle (talk) 04:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Andreas Ramos

Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. Keitsist, thanks for creating Andreas Ramos!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes,

Anastasia Bykova (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Yau Yau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to SPLA, United Democratic Front, Boma and Yei

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of United Nations Flight 544

The article United Nations Flight 544 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 21:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United Nations Flight 544 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Nations Flight 544 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations Flight 544 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...William 22:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Nations Flight 544, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SPLA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Keitsist. You have new messages at Vrenator's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sudan People's Defense Forces/Democratic Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upper Nile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Simanjiro Conservation Easement, Keitsist!

Wikipedia editor Anne Delong just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I hope that you will add more detail about this interesting arrangement. What types of tourism is involved? What products are not being grown as a result? A photo of the protected area would be nice. Good luck with your editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 20:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Anne Delong's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Redundancy is bad

Keitsist, I see your point that these words may look weird to speakers of both involved languages. The fact, however, remains that "awkward" is still a heavily subjective word, which should generally not be used at all in an encyclopedic context. If something is awkward or not should be decided upon by the reader, not by the enclyclopedia. May I suggest a compromise? We could use the word awkward but in a sentence which quotes in the prose of the article itself the person who coined "awkward." How does "[...] which commonly leads to the, redundancy "Seleka alliance," which is viewed by [influential observer X] as "awkward." sound? —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 17:48, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just explained on your talk page the authorities that define redundant verbiage as awkward: AP and Garner.

As we are talking about a language with fewer than a half million native speakers in a third-world country with fewer than 30k internet connections, no national newspapers online and an adult literacy rate of about one half, I conclude that your "compromise proposal" was meant as a joke. I appreciate your subtle sense of humor and I will be adding something like "... moniker 'seleka coalition,' a redundancy that contravenes global news writing standards.(cite) Keitsist (talk) 18:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see you added to revision 547001531 a note about word usage. You left a citation for a writing style book.
This seemed out of place so I removed it.
J_Tom_Moon_79 (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Séléka

Could you please leave the line of text with ref so that readers can see what the relevant part of the reference says. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the valuable note from the Sango dictionary. I don't know how to get access to one. However, this reference style doesn't quote the cited material. Please see WP:CITEVAR. If you're worried about the source material going offline then please archive it (see Wikipedia:Using_WebCite. Also, that blog is not the most reliable source and the meaning of the word is already discussed in the article.Keitsist (talk) 03:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But the thing is there is a RM at the moment about the name. It is worthwhile to leave the line of text with ref so that readers can see what the relevant part of the reference says. (Personally I consider this cite format annoying and reader-unfriendly, but I understand many editors like it).

Also. This edit isn't duplication:

A. The word Seleka reportedly means "The Alliance" or "The Coalition" in the Sango language. (source journaux-francais.com but there are others)
B. The name of the group means the "CPSK-CPJP-UFDR Alliance" in Sango (no source)

You've removed A. not B. but A. is better sourced than B. And B is evidently incorrect since Seleka already was used as a name before for another alliance so cannot mean the "CPSK-CPJP-UFDR Alliance" in Sango. Please fix this. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, the source for B is AFP 2013-01-01, which is cited right at the end of that sentence. This source says exactly the same thing as the non-reliable looking blog cited for A.

It is redundant. Saying that "Séléka ABCDF" means "ABCDF Alliance" is the same as saying that "Séléka" means "Alliance," in my opinion. I see how a hasty reader could get thrown off by the group of initialisms, so a more pedantic explanation may be called for. As the abbreviations of the individual militia names have already been explained, their meaning in conjunction with the word "alliance" is self-evident. The name of the group isn't Seleka. It is Seleka CPSK-CPJP-UFDR. I added the content about the previous use in there for the precise reason that you state - to underscore that "seleka" alone is a generic term for a coalition, not a uniquely identifying name as it has come to be used. To be precise, it was not used as a name; it was used in a name.

I agree that the sfn citation format is not ideal. It is the most effective one that I have found so far though.

Could you check whether "fini" is a Sango word? I can't tell whether Démafouth's group was using the french fini or whether this means something else in Sango. Thanks in advance!Keitsist (talk) 04:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry "The name of the group means the "CPSK-CPJP-UFDR Alliance" in Sango " is linguistically speaking evidently nonsense and no source would say that.

The sfn citation format prevents anyone finding any reference. I click [9] and it goes to AFP 2013-01-01. I click AFP 2013-01-01. and nothing happens. How is that effective?

Even if it worked, adding the key line of text is helpful.

Fini means Life or New. I'm not sure whether Fini Seleka means Life Alliance or New Alliance or both In ictu oculi (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I'm being thick. I am no linguistics expert. To me it is very difficult to imagine how "some foreign phrase" means "some English phrase, in some language" would not convey exactly what it seems like it should. In this case "the name of the group" stands in for the "some foreign phrase." While this requires the reader to remember for about three paragraphs what the name of the group is, it avoids repeating the unfortunately lengthy name itself.

The sfn style separates footnotes from the reference list, which is the intuitive approach for anyone who reads academic texts. I started appreciating it when I was citing books, which you can't click through to anyhow. The web links are still there in the reference list though. Regards, Keitsist (talk) 06:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Compare "Discos Sony BMG" means records in Spanish" - don't worry I will fix it.

As to the links, the whole point of wp is that it is html. Ideally the ref should be (a) possible to find, which at the moment on this article they aren't because they are dislocated, (b) give BOTH click through AND the key line of text whether the link will rot or not. I'm going to repair [9], because I will have to to fix above. It's up to you if you want to make the others possible for readers to find. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, the equivalent statement is "'discos Sony BMG' means 'Sony BMG disks' in Spanish." Your statement, which I removed, is the equivalent of "'discos' means 'disks' in Spanish." Neither is incorrect. I am arguing for the former because this article is about a group called Seleka CPSK-CPJP-UFDR, not the generic Sango word Seleka. Keitsist (talk) 07:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have fixed the sentence to make sense, please do not change it.

As to your links, they simply do not work. Clicking on the second section leaves the reader stranded unable to find the links in the third. Either you've set up the refs incorrectly or the template simply doesn't work. I suggest you either solve the problem or not use the template. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am fixing the links. You are intentionally violating the clear policy at WP:CITEVAR. This is not about what you prefer. The sfn style is established in this article. Please stop damaging the article.

Keitsist

(1) WP:CITEVAR is something I have not seen before. Perhaps because the non-functioning template you are using isn't common on articles I work on.

For future reference however when you say someone is intentionally doing something counter a guideline that you haven't cited you're making an assumption and accusation which is straying close to a personal attack. It is best not to use the word "intentionally" about other editor's intentions freely.

I repeat however that as to your links, they simply do not work. Clicking on the second section leaves the reader stranded unable to find the links in the third. Either you've set up the refs incorrectly or the template simply doesn't work. I suggest you either solve the problem or not use the template.

(2) For someone who a few lines upward was wondering if Fini was French for finished, you shouldn't be insisting on what is a simple linguistic note. You have there a sentence which is still incorrect and still not what the source says.

As a compromise I had changed

The name of the group means the "CPSK-CPJP-UFDR Alliance" in Sango,

To

The name Séléka CPSK-CPJP-UFDR means the "CPSK-CPJP-UFDR Alliance" in Sango,

But then reverted myself.

If you can't see why your sentence doesn't match up with the source, and if you're not willing to let someone who knows something about language edit the sentence, then that isn't my problem.

I tried to help you, I looked up Sango words for you and well... Anyway my involvement with this article is finished. Please do not ask me to check any African vocabulary for you. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a personal attack. It was a factually correct account of your actions. In my first response to you (03:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)), above, I politely asked you to please review the CITEVAR policy and I linked to it. We discussed it, and then you went ahead and added more non-conforming references anyway. I do not mean to offend you by saying that. I did mean to bring it to your attention so that you would stop repeating it.

I also never asked about French meaning of fini. I asked what the Sango meaning was. I found that dictionary now as well, but I do appreciate your help with this word.

Yes, I have put a lot of effort into this article, but that has nothing to do with the fact that it is objectively damaging when editors do not take due care to review cited sources. Sources give individual statements. We combine these statements into sentences, paragraphs and articles. That AFP source makes all the statements that appear in that translation that you objected to. I realize that this phrase is too complex for many editors to process all at once so it will be changed.

That is all. I wish you all the best for your future editing. Regards, Keitsist (talk) 09:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you are in fact correct that you did mention CITEVAR, it didn't register. As I said I have never come across it. All the same please don't say "intentionally" in an edit summary, it is not nice. And all I can say is you've effectively locked out other editors from contributing to any article you make a rule that once this ghastly (and non-working) template is used every other user must use it or is not allowed to add sources, without which they cannot edit. And the result still doesn't work, you still have created an article where half the references cannot be seen or accessed. Click RFI 2012-12-20 and you see what I mean. Click, nothing happens, no clue where or what the ref is. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I put up with citation styles that aren't my favorite all the time. Their documentation is all available, eg WP:SFN. I didn't invent that, I'm not the only one using it. I also repair and improve many references inserted by other authors. I believe that this is the most constructive path.

I see that some of those citations don't take you immediately to where you want to go. I apologize. I'm working on it. In the mean time it is easy to visually identify the appropriate source in the list below, based on name and date, just as in the journals we all grew up with. Again, I really don't mean to get personal, but I keep getting the sense that you are not reading thoroughly enough and then blaming (and even belittling) others when you don't comprehend (see: missed CITEVAR link, misread fini question, overlooked reference links, improper Sony BMG comparison). As you otherwise appear to be an intelligent editor, it is difficult to perceive this as other than intentional. Keitsist (talk) 11:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Wani Igga, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SPLA and Zande (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kibale National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Boma National Park may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

11_wildlife.pdf|format=pdf|title=Wildlife and Protected Area Management|accessdate=1 August 2011}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plectranthus rotundifolius‎

Hi, Keitsist. Thanks for your additions to the Plectranthus rotundifolius‎ article! I liked your reformating of Vernacular Names table. I'm glad someone's taking an interest in the article, and the plant, since I've been really lazy about working on it. I copied some additional sources about the plant from the draft on my old user space to the article's talk page. Hopefully, they'll be you useful to you and other editors, and maybe to me if I get back to work on it.

I have a question about ngaboyo as a vernacular name P. rotundifolius‎. Is this just from the list in Lost Crops of Africa? If so, I'm dubious about adding it. Names from Lost Crops' list that I've been able to check have numerous errors – which can happen easily enough if someone's typing up lists of words in foreign languages, and the editors have no way to check them. For example, they have kentang dwaja as an Indonesian vernacular name. It's a typo for kentang Djawa, the pre-1972 spelling for kentang Jawa, "Java potato". They have kembili or ubi kembili listed as a name in Malaysia – gembili is a vernacular name for Dioscorea esculenta (a kind of yam), not Plectranthus rotundifolius‎. They give kizhangu as a vernacular name in India. It means "tuber" in Tamil and Malayalam, and P. rotundifolius called is siru kizhangu, "little tuber", in Tamil, but kizhangu by itself is not a specific term for P. rotundifolius in either language.

I haven't been willing to add names from the list in Lost Crops to the article unless they're confirmed by other sources familiar with the language, the plant, and the botanical name (preferably a source familiar with all three, but I've been willing to accept a combination of sources to confirm that a listed name is a real word and does in fact refer to P. rotundifolius‎). That Lost Crops just gives ngaboyo as a name in Chad without specifying a language doesn't exactly inspire confidence. --Namnagar (talk) 12:39, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really that worried about it. I have had no indication that the Lost Crops book is unreliable but that may be true. At the moment it is the only reference to the plant's name in Chad. My inclination would be to include it since I can't imagine how doing so would cause harm if it turns out to be false and it increases the chances that future editors will improve it. Keitsist (talk) 22:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to imply that Lost Crops was in any general way unreliable, just that their list of vernacular names isn't. Like I said, lists like this are very easy to screw up and hard for editors to vet, especially if some of the names are in obscure languages. Namnagar (talk) 23:57, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timbavati Game Reserve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tsonga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brotenaubach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eyach (Enz), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-ton

The Keshen Goodman Public Library in Halfax and WikiProject Nova Scotia will be hosting an edit-a-thon on Saturday, 19 March 2016 focused on creating local articles and Nova Scotia content. We hope editors like your selves could help the less experienced members. Edit-a-ton JBignell (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Sudan Federal Democratic Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SPLA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Keitsist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Keitsist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metabolix Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metabolix Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Keitsist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Civil Authority for the New Sudan" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Civil Authority for the New Sudan". Since you had some involvement with the "Civil Authority for the New Sudan" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamaha Ténéré 700 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yamaha Ténéré 700, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. D^(talk) 03:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

noted and corrected. Welcome to Wikipedia, @CASSIOPEIA! Keitsist (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ECCAS logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ECCAS logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Keitsist. Thank you for your work on Camp Castor. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Paleofauna of Uganda

A tag has been placed on Category:Paleofauna of Uganda indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Louise Byg Kongsholm

The article Louise Byg Kongsholm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Kongsholm's work does not appear to meet WP:AUTHOR and I cannot find sufficient sources to meet WP:BASIC. The only significant coverage I have found is this short article with an overview of her career.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.