User talk:Kiliopa
Welcome!
|
Your edit on the article Treason has been reverted due to bias
[edit]Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Treason (specifically, the caption you added to the photo of Litvinenko). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Richard75 (talk) 11:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Treason, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
[edit]Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Treason has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Prmcd16 (talk) 12:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Henry VIII of England.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Henry VIII of England was changed by Kiliopa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877616 on 2016-04-26T00:37:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kiliopa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Sro23 (talk) 00:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)