Jump to content

User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2022/05

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tech News: 2022-18

[edit]

19:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-19

[edit]

15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Tech News: 2022-20

[edit]

18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

File licensing question

[edit]

Hi King of Hearts. Would you mind taking a look at User talk:Rbmn#File permission problem with File:Krebs Portrait 1910-01.jpg? Perhaps you could help sort this file's licensing out. Feel free to correct or clarify anything I posted as needed. It seems as if the file in question should PD and OK for Commons, but I'm not totally sure. Just from looking at all of the file related notifications on this user's talk page, it appears that many of their uploads have been deleted in the past for one reason or another. Perhaps some of these might also be PD now. For reference, I only came across this file because it was licensed as non-free content and ended up being recently removed by a bot from the user's sandbox for WP:NFCC#9 reasons. (This user even seems to have been edit warring with the bot over this, but that's probably not relevant if the file is PD) TAnyway, te file didn't have a non-free use rationale which meant it was eligible for speedy deletion per WP:F6; there would, however, be no need for a non-free use rationale if the file is PD. Another file (File:Tracteur Chatillon-Panhard 1914.jpg) uploaded by the same user might also be PD. It too was originally uploaded as non-free, but the user has also relicensed it as CC-by-sa-4.0. Finally, there does seem to be some COI issues as well, but those are separate from the file's licensing issues. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are three ways the portrait could be PD in France:
  1. The author is known to have died before 1952 (c:Template:PD-old);
  2. The author has never been known, and the work was published before 1952 (c:Template:PD-anon-70-EU or c:Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure); or
  3. The author transferred copyright to the subject, and the uploader releases it under PD (c:Template:PD-heirs).
Each of these requires different evidence:
  1. For PD-old, the author's name and proof of their year of death.
  2. For PD-anon-70EU/PD-EU-no author disclosure (which are basically duplicates, so take your pick), the specific requirements are a little bit murky, but you can find some discussion at c:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure.
  3. For PD-heirs, proof via VRTS that the uploader is in fact an heir, and some sort of documentation on transfer of copyright.
King of ♥ 03:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the detailed response. File:Krebs Portrait 1910-01.jpg was actually already uploaded to Commons as File:Arthur Constantin Krebs.jpg by a different user back in 2015. It was licensed as {{PD-US}}, but I'm not sure that's totally correct. I'm also not sure whether there needs to be two of the same file since they're essentially the same. Any suggestions on what to do now? Just let the local file be deleted and ask the great-grandson to use the one already on Commons? Something else? -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have the two local files been published anywhere in the world before 1927? Then they are OK to keep on English Wikipedia as PD-US. It is on Commons that we have a stricter requirement of PD in the source country, which requires knowledge of authorship. -- King of ♥ 04:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's something I don't know. Based upon the discussion I had with the uploader on his user talk page, I'm not sure whether even he knows. I don't even know whether he knew about the Commons files since they don't seem to have been being used on Wikipedia. He uploaded those two local files in May 2006 which was well before they were uploaded to Commons; so, he might not have noticed they were subsequenty uploaded to Commons. FWIW, I'm unable to get the source url given for the Commons portrait file to work to check the files origin, but there's no mention of this website on local portrait file's page. Given the local file was uploaded as non-free many years before it was uploaded to Commons, it's possible the source for the Commons file got its version from Wikipedia. Someone then wanting to use the file on some other language Wikipedia may have found it on that wesbite, thought it was PD, and uploaded it to Commons. Anyway, it's only been a day since my last post on the great-grandson's user talk page. Maybe he'll reply sometime soon, and I can try and pin things down with respect to the dates of first publication for these files. Do you think, in the meantime, that the Commons files need to be taken to DR? File:Artillery Tractor Chatillon-Panhard 1914.jpg is licensed as "PD-old-70-1923" and the source url given is actually the great-grandson's wesbite. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Currently there is not enough information to support a declaration of PD-old at Commons, so a DR would need to be started if we don't find out anything more. On the contrary, our standard for publication is often murky; sometimes we just accept images if they have a date, look like they're plausibly from that date, and seem like they were published contemporarily. -- King of ♥ 04:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After further queries, the uploader has posted that they think the photo was first published in Revue aéronautique de France (here) in 1924. It's a very low quality representation, but it looks like it's the same photo. Since the publication is in French, I assuming the first publication was also in France. No information provided about who took the photo, though the uploader did change the file's description so that it now reads "a photographer paid by Krebs" instead of "own". It appears the uploader seems to think it was a "work for hire", but theye also seem to think that asking someone to your photo also automatically means a transfer of copyright from them to you. Maybe the best that can be done here would be to treat this an unknown work under EU copyright law for Commons purposes, but that seems like it would be really complicated to sort out. Your suggestion about keeping the local photo as "PD-US" seems more promising. Do you think {{PD-US-expired-abroad}} would be a possible option here? If the photo was taken in 1910, then it would most likely also be PD in France in 2031 after 120 years have passed if author is unknown, right? Perhaps, in the meantime, the local file could be relicensed as {{PD-US-expired-abroad|out_of_copyright_in=2031}}? -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, I've fixed the licensing on this image. -- King of ♥ 01:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for helping to sort this one out. I'm assuming the corresponding Commons file is now going to need to be DR'd. Any ideas on how to try and resolve File:Tracteur Chatillon-Panhard 1914.jpg? This one might not be a directly connected to the uploader's great grandfather as the other photo was, but it might also be easier to figure out when it was first published. As I posted above, the source given for the Commons file is the great-grandson's website, which may not be the first instance of publication. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
http://rbmn.free.fr/Tracteur_Chatillon-Panhard_1911.html seems to imply that it is from a 1914 book, and the page crease on the right of the image is consistent with it being from a book. So I'm pretty sure it is PD in the US. But without authorship information we don't know its status in France. -- King of ♥ 20:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader responded to my query about its provenance and stated it's from a postcard, but I'm not sure that means it's a postcard that was published in a book or it's a postcard that someone sent their family. Either way, I don't think it's unreasonable to assume it was "published" somewhere (even a postcard (as the word is commonly used) would seem to meet c:COM:PUBLISHED for the US) and that it was published prior to 1927. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 22: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn

[edit]
May 22, 12-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn
Prospect Park, 1871 map

You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor "Hacknic" gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the 10th Avenue Lawn of Brooklyn's Prospect Park.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.

12:00 - 5:00 pm
(10th Avenue Lawn, Prospect Park, Brooklyn)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 02:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

[edit]

Cwf97

[edit]

Cwf97 is asking to be unblocked. You were the original blocking admin, and I think Cwf97 could probably benefit from a second chance. I don't think Cwf97 is a sock puppet of CensoredScribe, and there isn't any evidence of recent block evasion (though, for what it worth, I doubt Cwf97 could have easily evaded the hard block I did after the last socking incident). The current unblock request isn't perfect, but I think the editor understands why they were blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objections to whatever you decide. -- King of ♥ 02:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

[edit]
Wishing King of Hearts a very of Hearts happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:47, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

[edit]

Tech News: 2022-21

[edit]

00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

May 25, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

[edit]

Tech News: 2022-22

[edit]

20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi King of Hearts,

This is to let you know that File:Lower Manhattan from Governors Island August 2017 panorama.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 11, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-09-11. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One World Trade Center

One World Trade Center, seen here amongst the skyline of Lower Manhattan, is the main building of the rebuilt World Trade Center complex in New York City. It is the tallest building in the United States, the tallest in the Western Hemisphere, and the seventh-tallest in the world. The supertall structure has the same name as the North Tower of the original World Trade Center, which was destroyed in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Photograph credit: King of Hearts