User talk:Klimgeran

Welcome!

Hello, Klimgeran, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Luca Litrico, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! J 947 18:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luca Litrico

The article Luca Litrico has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J 947 18:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Luca Litrico, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Luca Litrico. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Luca Litrico, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Stop removing these maintenance templates. The article has links but very few. It has nothing to do with how many references you add. There are no article that link to it. Meters (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your most recent edits as they were including heaps of external links in the article body text, contrary to WP:External links. If you intended them to be references, see Help:Referencing for beginners. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klimgeran, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as LucaLitrico (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Meters (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Luca Litrico. Changing usernames is not going to help. Stop removing this. Nothing links to this article. Meters (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had already been told about misplaced external links but you added another so I have deleted it. I have also deleted your crude manually-coded attempt to add a contents list, as there is already a contents list automatically provided. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another topic about which you have been warned before is the marking of minor edits. If you understand English, please read Help:Minor edit and comply with it; if you don't understand English, you ought to stick to the Wikipedia in your own language, the Italian one if appropriate. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luca Litrico for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luca Litrico is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Litrico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you being paid to create Luca Litrico?

You say you've been asked to create this. Are you doing this for free, as part of your job, or? Doug Weller talk 19:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk I'm doing this is interesting to me for free

Klimgeran (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Doug Weller talk 20:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk

How much money do Wikipedia need to publish the project? I thought free. This is my first project on Wikipedia Klimgeran (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not ask people to pay to have articles. Some editors will do paid editing, but it is frowned on, and if not disclosed results in an immediate block. Any editors that do paid editing are not allowed to promote or advertise their services on Wikipedia, so there is no point in asking about it. Meters (talk) 00:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:COI and WP:PAID Meters (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk Thank you for the answer Klimgeran (talk) 13:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NEM (cryptocurrency) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NEM (cryptocurrency), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 08:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Symbol (cryptocurrency)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Symbol (cryptocurrency), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 11:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NEM (cryptocurrency) (September 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mikehawk10 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEM (cryptocurrency) found that this topic was not notable. A bunch of coins of this cryptocurrency being stolen does not move the needle on satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH nor WP:ORGIND, while the remaining sources do not appear to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klimgeran! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NEM (cryptocurrency)

The article NEM (cryptocurrency) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

At its current state, the article relies heavily on primary sourcing. I have not been able to find third-party RS covering the topic either, so it may be worth reviewing whether it can stay in mainspace or not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WomenProj (talk) 22:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Klimgeran, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

WomenProj (talk) 10:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NEM (cryptocurrency) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NEM (cryptocurrency) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEM (cryptocurrency) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WomenProj (talk) 17:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NEM (cryptocurrency)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NEM (cryptocurrency) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEM (cryptocurrency) (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Symbol (cryptocurrency)

Hello, Klimgeran. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Symbol (cryptocurrency), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Symbol (cryptocurrency)

Hello, Klimgeran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Symbol".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]