User talk:KosovoLegacy

Welcome to my talk page, if you have to leave me a message, make sure it's a constructive one, not stupodity like the classic example below which only makes me laugh, lol:

Your edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hús ö nd 21:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dont revert good edits!

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Hús ö nd 22:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

already explained, basic explanation of articles is required

Final warnings

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hús ö nd 23:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Húsönd 23:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

o yea, how come nobody blocks you, you are screwing things up with pathetic excuses!

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chess in early literature, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bubba73 (talk), 23:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise not adding GM Jacob Yuchtman into any more articles without establishing his notability. I have already blocked one user for this tonight, and I want to be able to resist the temptation to assume that you are that user in a different guise. Up to you. --Rodhull andemu 00:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well, then add something under jacob, create article, then I will improve it! that was correct article whoever did it, i added proper sources, you removed it, not nice!thats vandalism!

No. Please see this policy. You didn't add any sources, just a link to a non-existent article. That's pointless. However, I note your edit summary to the above, which rings bells. If you want this guy to be linked from chess-related articles, first create his article within our policies. That's not my job. My job is to block disruptive and sock-puppeting editors. As I said, up to you, but my patience is wearing thin as I could be doing better things. --Rodhull andemu 00:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about, I added under sources, my patience is thin, start article then I will add it, cuz if i start you will accuse me of some bs so called vandalism again...

Again. No. Which part of that are you having a problem with? You haven't had time to read WP:BURDEN since my last edit, not at all. You start the article, it's your responsibility. --Rodhull andemu 00:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December, continuation

lol what other suck am i? how disgusting and rude you 'great' administrators are, shame on you!

Don't push your luck, and read WP:DUCK. It's only through your other edits that you are still clinging on here by a thread, albeit a very thin one. We are not as stupid as you think. --Rodhull andemu 01:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

calm down boy, i am not attacking you, also dont be judgmental, think, may be i know the person who did the edits and i tried to help, there are million combinations, but honestly, i'll suspend myself and not contribute if you continue treating people with disrespect and i dont care what you have to say because I am sure you will find perfect excuse...

That reminds me of chico marx joke, y not a duck, y not a chock chicken, but u would not know anything about that... at least you appreciate some of my edits, but you should have pointed that out long ago, DUH!!

I spoke to the guy who did those edits, i will be glad to create Yuchtman article once I am sure I'll not have it reverted, after all, creating an article could be vandalism here... I am convinced this player was a good one! Screwed by comis!

Personal Attacks

You were kind enough to ask me to help work on F Troop, but its not really a main interest of mine, so I didn't get involved. But, based on how you treat most (all?) other editors, I am glad I did not. I suggest you review the policy on personal attacks, as you appear to not pay it much attention. You will get more cooperation with your fellow editors if you assume they are not idiots and are trying to make Wikipedia a good thing. Not everyone will agree with you. Not everyone will be brilliant. (John User:Jwy talk) 00:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

who cares, but who outside wikipedos agrees with wikipedia, nobody as wikipedia-watch.org claims all links true@! —Preceding unsigned comment added by KosovoLegacy2 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rod clearly said this user contributed a great deal, yet thanx to no good dirty lowlife wikipedoidiots he was suspended for what, now he'll not edit a lot nor correct mistakes here or elsewhere on wiki, nobody appreciated hard work, not everyone will be brilliant but he is, so let people read mistakes, there are too many on wikias, its sad norm, BUT JUSTLY JEWBO CANT FIND NEW DONORS, WIKIPEDIA TO GO DEEP TO HELL, GOOD! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.1.213 (talk) 02:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old saying will get em, what goes up(within gravitational field either way) will come down!

Wikia ll not be free4long!lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salingood (talk • contribs) 01:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE RIGHT, AS CHESSMASTA SAID, CHESS IS VANITY, SO IT LOWLY WIKIPEEDIA WIKIPEDIA 100% WIKIDIOTS LOL!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.48.13.42 (talk) 15:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]