User talk:Koushikworldian

Welcome!

Hello, Koushikworldian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm The Banner. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Annexation of Goa seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 10:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Diu Fortress. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. The Banner talk 10:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't claim your own opinion as neutral point of view.If you have proofs then you can refute mine point which is a fact. Any doubts go and check.. I will make proper changes in the skewed presentation of you nothing (talk) 11:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Annexation of Goa, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 12:35, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Annexation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. The Banner talk 12:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will make changes when my block expires.. You don't have any proper points to put forth! I will definitely thwart your inappropriate writings and will add Relevent content without bias nothing (talk) 17:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, India started an aggressive war to conquer territory that had never belonged to the Republic of India that only came into existence in 1950 (dominion in 1947). The Banner talk 17:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the ouset, how did Portuguese got goa, daman and diu which were thousands of miles away from it? In fact, by making worthless treaties with indian kingdoms of that time Portuguese got them. They ruled it for a brief period. They(you!) collected unfair tariffs and made huge conversions of locals to Christianity! Plunder, Atrocities,Exploitation and Illegal occupation is what they have done nothing (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Banner. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Annexation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Annexation of Goa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How come my edits comes under Unconstructive edits? On what basis you have decided that? Who are you to breach my freedom of speech .Mine edits are neither Unconstructive nor provoking. Show proper evidences of your accusations nothing (talk) 09:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This shows you don't have any points to disprove me and shows how got feared for it. Banning unanimously without proper points shows your cowardness.shame! I will migrate to better platform. The moment you unblock me, i will exercise my right of proper edits. nothing (talk) 09:33, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In fact you never provided a shred of evidence that your POV is shared by the world. You even claimed that a then non-existing state was robbed of some land and that that is reason enough for a relatively new state to start a war of aggression to conquer lands that never belonged to that state. And Wikipedia is fully based on sources, not on opinions. Unless you are able to prove your point with reliable sources, it has no place here on Wikipedia. The Banner talk 09:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the second edit i am about to provide the source and in that gap you have blocked me which is crude and indignity.. While coming to goa issue, it is under Portuguese rule just for a brief period when it is compared to Indian state ruling . The Portuguese invaded Goa in 1510, defeating the Bijapur Sultanate. The Goa Inquisition, established in 1560, persecuted Hindus, Muslims, and other religious minorities is what your Wikipedia is saying and this is the source. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Goa

You can't just be with bias. Just because Uk colonised USA in past and France, Uk ,Russia and few conquered parts of China earlier ,Now you can't say china belongs to those countries. Ruling by conquering for a brief period when compared to the history of a country can't legitimate it's plunder and suppression.You may add your own terms and put your opinions as fact but these things can't erase the atrocities you have committed! nothing (talk) 02:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lying 1000 times and projecting your own opinion as facts ,is too juvenile and Insane. It can't erase the oppression by Portuguese from people's mind. Enjoy the freedom by blocking me. nothing (talk) 02:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for agreeing that you have nothing to say.. And enjoy the peace you got by blocking me illegitimately in undemocratic and indecent way.. Thanks... Peace. nothing (talk) 06:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]