User talk:Kpaddock

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Arnica appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:09, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Kpaddock! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Verbal chat 08:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Moving on

You think I'm trying to exclude other voices. Vague comments are not helpful. You are trying to include unreliable references and do your own editorializing. You claim that I've been involved in disciplinary action on Wikipedia before. No. I have been harrassed many times by abusive admins and have been in many content disputes with people who intentially lie. QuackGuru (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well, maybe I've misinterpreted things. You're welcome to discount anything I've said if it's not true. The takeaway message I was trying to relay is that I'd encourage you to think critically about your own opinions and allow other people to make contributions to Wikipedia. Kpaddock (talk) 21:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add my opinion to the article. I did not editorialize. I included some of your suggestions using reliable references. Article-building is based on core Wikipedia policies. We cannot compromise the article with unreliable references, editorializing, or duplication from other sections. If you have good ideas using the right sources in accordance with WP:NPOV it is likely your contributions will be included. QuackGuru (talk) 21:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've made your point. I disagree with you. I haven't had my sources criticised in the past. Either way, this conversation is over. Kpaddock (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message Waiting...

Hello, Kpaddock. You have new messages at UncleBubba's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.