User talk:Kt925

Let Dean Winchester remain on the LGBT list 😳 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14A:8200:2A40:1C7:49E:D272:C964 (talk) 00:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kte95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Fall Down Dead

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

um-

I see how you keep changing castiel to pansexual and I just want to say as to how i’m all here for pansexual cas, it’s just not accurate because first of all nothing is ever stated in the show, the only thing we know is that he loves dean, second is that the only evidence left on the internet of misha ever talking about cas’ sexuality is saying that “homosexual love declaration” line. several fans remember a discussion about how (misha?) said cas is unlabeled. particularly using gay and queer as an UMBRELLA TERM, that DOES NOT mean cas is fully homosexual. And this is for the exact reason that all fans have their own interpretation of cas, asexual cas, pansexual cas, homosexual, bisexual, you name it, castiel has not ben labeled in the show therefore, technically unlabeled and up to interpretation. Many lgbtq+ people use gay or queer as an umbrella term, most people I know use gay or queer, I sometimes use those labels myself to avoid complicated explanations. Labeling castiel as pansexual in the “official list”, i’m terribly sorry to say, is incorrect because that is implying that in the show they reveal he is pansexual, which never happened, on top of that sort of ruining the whole idea that fans can have their own interpretation of castiel.

I am simply trying to provide this page with the most accurate information, thank you for understanding. Negativeseventy7 (talk) 08:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please come to the Talk Page for LGBT TV series 1970s-2000 to discuss the issues with Castile. The page is locked from edits because of constant disruptive edits. It would be much better if you just talked with everyone. Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 05:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Total and Live+7 ratings

Hi Kte95. There seems to be confusion about the Programming Insider Ratings. But "Live+7" means "“Live + 7 Days = Includes all playback that occurred within seven days of the live airing". This is straight from Nielsen definition. I know Programming Insider's articles says "final nationals" ratings. But it also says it's "Preliminary Primetime Ratings" and "Fast Affiliates". Given that their L+7 ratings are published merely a day after the show airs, it's impossible these are actual final ratings. L+# means three days after, L+& seven days after. What Programming Insider are including is just an estimate. I believe by "Final Nationals' they mean the same day viewership of a show which is added to their Live+7 estimates. But a rating you need to wait a week to get, you can't say it's final if you publish numbers after a day. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 21:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LéKashmiriSocialiste. They didn’t publish those ratings the day after. The site says that the page was updated with L+7 ratings on April 17th. So they were added more than a week after the episode aired. Kte95 (talk) 22:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see that now, thank you for informing me and apologies for the misunderstanding. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 03:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Kte95 (talk) 05:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using SpoilerTv, it's an unreliable fan site and wasn't it already agreed in past by consensus to not use it? LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 12:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time using it and I’ve never seen or heard about an agreement like that. I won’t use it again Kt925 (talk) 03:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony Randel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Children of the Night. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lair: OnlyFangs (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sungodtemple was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The one source included is quite short and almost can be considered PR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lair: OnlyFangs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 14:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kt925! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 14:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lair: OnlyFangs (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lair: OnlyFangs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Lair: OnlyFangs

Hello, Kt925. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Lair: OnlyFangs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Darth Stabro. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jared Padalecki without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 19:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]