User talk:Ktmstreetrider

Welcome!

Hello, Ktmstreetrider, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 00:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bishwo Gautam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bishwo Gautam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 17:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishwo Gautam (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately, this submission does not include any references. Please review this helpful guide about writing an article, this guideline on how to identify reliable sources, and this helpful guide about referencing. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me by clicking here or asking at the Teahouse. Also, are you aware of this?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bishwo Gautam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bishwo Gautam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ktmstreetrider! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sandbox please read

I know the subject is similar to a deleted one. The admin who deleted the first article asked me to write a draft for submission. This is purely with his orders. Please undelete it Ktmstreetrider (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Ktmstreetrider! References are very important for articles, especially when about living people, that is why it was declined. I did not delete the draft (only administrators can do that), merely declined the submission. You can still work to add the references to it and otherwise improve it. Which admin are you talking about? Cryptic? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am working to add references sanddoctor. No its Jo-Jo Eumerus

Decline

Hi there TheSandDoctor! I have added all the refrence. Now can you please accept it? Ktmstreetrider (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishwo Gautam (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The given sources largely are not independent or not reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bishwo Gautam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bishwo Gautam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Huon (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Racemandu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Racemandu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racemandu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SeytX (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 16:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts (Special:Diff/825470194). Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 06:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ktmstreetrider (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry for being naive. I didn't know about these rules. It won't happen again. Please unblock me. I have made a lot of contributions from this username and don't want to be deleted. Please Ktmstreetrider (talk) 06:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ktmstreetrider (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I had two accounts and made a deleted article from another account. I didn't know this was against the rules. I now know that it shouldn't be done again. I admit my mistake and won't do it again. Please unblock my account :( Ktmstreetrider (talk) 13:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems to me that you did know it was against the rules, as it appears that you lied about it in the link below. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This might have been more credible had it come before this transparent denial. —Cryptic 16:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cryptic= I admit I did it. Common now cryptic, help me. I am amateur. Help me in this, and article too please

{Unblock}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ktmstreetrider (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I didn't know about that. I didn't know my account would be blocked this way. I admit I did wrong. Sorry, I won't do it again now that I know wghat would happen if I go against the rule. Please forgive me for once. I will do niothing ike, this againKtmstreetrider (talk) 14:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ktmstreetrider (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I had two accounts and made a deleted article from another account. I didn't know this was against the rules. I now know that it shouldn't be done again. I admit my mistake and won't do it again. Please unblock my account :( I didn't know my account would be blocked this way. I admit I did wrong. Sorry, I won't do it again now that I know wghat would happen if I go against the rule. Please forgive me for once. I will do niothing ike, this again

Ktmstreetrider (talk) 13:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you didn't know that misrepresenting yourself, as well as the name of the subject you tried to write about, would be against the rules? Then I have to conclude that you lack the competence required to edit Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 00:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ktmstreetrider (talk) 13:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:sockpuppetry and unblock discussion

Hello. Let's start anew. Just a few questions, if you please.

Please list all accounts you have edited under and all articles you have edited or created. Thanks, --Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What outside connection do you have to any articles you have edited or written?
Have you received compensation or consideration for editing or creating articles?

That's a start. I might think of more questions as we go along.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Bishwo Gautam

Draft:Bishwo Gautam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bishwo Gautam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Bishwo Gautam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 22:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Dashain!

Namaste, Ktmstreetrider, and Happy Dashain!

WikiProject Nepal wishes you a wonderful Dashain filled with joy, love, and happiness.

Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great Dashain! Cheers.

Message sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject Nepal.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Namaste, Ktmstreetrider! You are cordially invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Nepal. You are invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 article creations. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for Nepal on Wikipedia! Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by using:

{{subst:WikiProject Nepal/The 10,000 Challenge Invite}} ~~~~

Thanks.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]