User talk:Kungkang

Welcome!

Hello, Kungkang, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Wu Sien, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Merlion 444 08:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wu Sien

A tag has been placed on Wu Sien requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Merlion 444 08:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Your addition to Zheng He has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This appears to be a copyright violation - please do not add it again - we have strict rules against copyright violation, and unless you can show that it is indeed free it must not be added to the article. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with your articles

Wikipedia articles need sources, please read WP:RS and WP:Verify. I am having serious problems showing that Wu Sien ever existed and am considering taking this to a deletion discussion. Can you please provide some sources (preferably but not necessarily in English, but they do need to be accessible somewhere, have enough details to find them, and that includes page numbers). Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 06:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Could you please give me the Chinese characters for Wu Sien? Thank you. Happy editing. --Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wu Sien

I have nominated Wu Sien, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Sien. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dougweller (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yue kong

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yue kong, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.regenttour.com/china/martial/shaolin/MonkYueKong.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation and sources

Once again you have violated our copyright policy. You are also creating articles with no sources - please see WP:RS and WP:VERIFY. A possibly larger problem is that you aren't responding here. As another Administrator recently told an editor, "we expect all editors to engage with their peers. This means replying to their concerns, discussing edits when necessary on article- and user-talk pages, using edit-summaries, and generally making it easy for other editors to understand why you've done what you've done. This is absolutely fundamental to the collaborative process of building Wikipedia, and editors who continually fail to communicate in a meaningful way are eventually blocked." If you don't respond I'll have to assume either you aren't interested or that you don't speak English (and as this is the English language Wikipedia we need to be able to communicate with you in English and you need to be able to read our policies and guidelines). I don't want to see you blocked, but you need to respond. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 12:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Zhu Benli, Prince of Han

I have nominated Zhu Benli, Prince of Han, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Benli, Prince of Han. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dougweller (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Dongwu.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dongwu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 11:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

You are not using edit summaries and you really need to if you don't want your edits removed. You also are not communicating on your talk page. Wikipedia is a collaborative activity and we expect all editors to engage with their peers. This means replying to their concerns, discussing edits when necessary on article- and user-talk pages, using edit-summaries, and generally making it easy for other editors to understand why you've done what you've done. This is absolutely fundamental to the collaborative process of building Wikipedia, and editors who continually fail to communicate in a meaningful way are eventually blocked. Dougweller (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dongwu123.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dongwu123.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

You are supposed to use edit summaries. If you don't know what these are, just ask. Information you add needs to be WP:Verifiable, that means readers need to be able to check your sources. But you don't add you sources.

Given the above, and your failure to communicate, I see no reason not to revert your edits if they don't meet our guidelines. Dougweller (talk) 12:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am really pleased that you replied, I don't want to be harsh but needed to see if you were happy about working with other editors. If you click on the history tab at the top of your screen you'll see the edit history of the article. - date, who edited it, the section heading if they edited a section, and then hopefully but not always an edit summary. Click on this: WP:Edit summaries to learn what they are. It's the field right under the window where I am typing. If you want help learning how to cite sources I can help with that too, but probably not until Sunday. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 15:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kingdom of Dazhou

The article Kingdom of Dazhou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created and edited by a suspected sockpuppet of blocked User:Yongle the Great

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _LDS (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of General Oi

The article General Oi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hoax; Oi of Goguryeo, for example, comes up with zero g-hits

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 10:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of General Oi

I have nominated General Oi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Oi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no real coverage by reliable, third-party sources, which is what is required for an article to be kept. Ironholds (talk) 09:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do the research, i believe the source given is clear enough. thanks
sorry, i forget to login first before postingKungkang (talk) 08:19, 27 May 2010 (UTC) 125.162.49.182 (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bojong

The article Bojong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a single ref in the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mark nutley (talk) 23:14, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-chek, there is a reference at my article. Thanks Kungkang (talk) 04:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Halimun

A tag has been placed on William Halimun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zhu Benli, Prince of Han

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zhu Benli, Prince of Han, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wikiwak.com/wak/Zhu_Benli,_Prince_of_Han. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You fool bots, thats article is first written by me in wikipedia, then the other sites copy it from wikipedia before admin delete this page. Please be wiseKungkang (talk) 09:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You probably know, but the bot is just software. Don't worry about it. Dougweller (talk) 10:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More information

Hi. Can you please specify on what pages of The Cambridge history of China: The Ming dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1 by Frederick W. Mote, Denis Twitchett, John King Fairbank there is discussion of Zhu Benli? I do not see him in that book. I also checked reference there to Ming Pingzong but did not find anything. Perhaps I've missed the page. Or is he perhaps discussed there under a different name? (If so, it may be better to list the article under that name. Articles on Wikipedia are titled under their must common name in English, and there does not seem to be any reference to be found on Zhu Benli in google books or google scholar.) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I find someone else,see pages 737-738 here "southern+ming"++yongming&hl=en&ei=44ZRTO3tEuLU4wbn_o2sAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Emperor%20%22southern%20ming%22%20%20yongming&f=false and p. 255 here "southern+ming"+dynasty&hl=en&ei=xYRRTJ24HceK4gbvs7mLAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=Emperor%20%22southern%20ming%22%20dynasty&f=false

pages 72 and 73 here "southern+ming"+dynasty+1663&hl=en&ei=c4ZRTO-DApCJ4gb-i8z4Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false Dougweller (talk) 13:55, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i have mistaken in stating the source, the actual source is from baike.710302.xyz/zh-hans/定武帝. Can i just put that link into the article's reference ?Kungkang (talk) 02:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm sorry, but that is not a reliable source. It seems part of the article you've contributed here may be a direct translation of that article; if so, you do need to give credit, since that content is copyrighted. Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, specifically the section on copying from other language projects. Since he is not mentioned in this reference, I'll remove it from the article. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is definitely something wrong here. See Zhu Youlang, Prince of Gui which says he was the last emperor of the Southern Ming. And the link I gave above, [1], says the Yongli claimant was the last pretender, which confirms the Zhu Youlang article. Dougweller (talk) 05:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moonriddengirl, that is not direct translation, i do take information from baike.710302.xyz/zh-hans/定武帝 and also some research from googling, then from chinaforumhistory.com too... and there is also some reference stating at baike.710302.xyz/zh-hans/定武帝, we can take it as reference, you are so rushly to make a deletion. Kungkang (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete the article; it was deleted by an another administrator on the basis of this deletion debate. I can say based on that deletion debate that an article on this subject is not likely to succeed unless you are able to cite multiple reliable sources. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:53, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dougweller, there is many imperial princes claim to be emperor, and the last one is Zhu Benli, Prince of Han. He is the last imperial prince that fight for Ming, and one more, they are not pretenders, they not fight together, because each imperial prince want to be emperor themselves. I also contributed writing in Zhu Youlang, Prince of Gui article, how can you are the one who know the most about what is definitely wrong or not ? Kungkang (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not me, we go by the sources. No clearly reliable sources means no article, sorry. It doesn't mean someone is wrong or right, you simply have to have the sources for the article. There are a lot of English language sources on this era and the Southern Ming, and they don't seem to mention him but some mention the Prince of Gui. Don't take this personally, it's just the way Wikipedia works. Dougweller (talk) 17:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Samuel Kwok, Johan Tjongiran & Suwanto Lim.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Samuel Kwok, Johan Tjongiran & Suwanto Lim.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can help me, i dont understand what is the bot talking about Kungkang (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We need to know the copyright status of the images. You can ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions for help from experts or experiment with the links in the first paragraph. Dougweller (talk) 09:27, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How to add (editing existing image) license status for the image ? Anyway thanks for your help.. Kungkang (talk) 09:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ask at our help desk, WP:HELPDESK Dougweller (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suwanto Lim

The article Suwanto Lim has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not have any source because it is personal biography, the information that i got is direct from Suwanto diciples and family. Kungkang (talk) 09:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And we can't use those, that's against our basic policies, see WP:VERIFY. We call that original research, WP:OR. Dougweller (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i understand, i will add some source in the article. thanks Kungkang (talk)

Nomination of Suwanto Lim for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Suwanto Lim, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suwanto Lim until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 07:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wing Chun Kungfu Academy Indonesia for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Wing Chun Kungfu Academy Indonesia, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wing Chun Kungfu Academy Indonesia until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 07:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Sorry for that. thanks Kungkang (talk) 09:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Your addition to Wing Chun Kungfu Academy Indonesia has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I've warned you about this before. Please read our policy and comply with it. I'll have to block you if you do this again. Read the book,website, etc, and then put it into your own words. Don't just change a few around, it has to look basically different. Dougweller (talk) 05:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Logo wingchun.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo wingchun.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 03:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited PT Gayamakmur Lestari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License information needed for File:Logo gml.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Logo gml.jpg. However, we need to make sure a license is correctly displayed before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

Choose the appropriate license template: it needs to be a free license, in the public domain, or have a non-free use rationale. If you need help, you may ask at the media copyright questions page.
Paste in the template code, and save the page.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Djoko susanto, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese and Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Hearts of Freedom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch and Michael Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samuel suwanto.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samuel suwanto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ameri Ichinose

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ameri Ichinose requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --IShadowed 06:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ameri Ichinose

The article Ameri Ichinose has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Adjkasi (T | C | L) 06:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Ameri Ichinose, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adjkasi (T | C | L) 06:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martua sitorus

The article Martua sitorus has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. heather walls (talk) 05:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temple of Hong.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Temple of Hong.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Temple of Hong.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Temple of Hong.jpg, which you've attributed to http://history.cultural-china.com/en/47H2663H7699.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hary tanoesoedibjo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MNC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dong Chang (Eastern Agency) emblem.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dong Chang (Eastern Agency) emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kungkang. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anindya Bakrie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anindya Bakrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anindya Bakrie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nadiem Makarim

The article Nadiem Makarim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no adequate sources for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata

Halo Kungkang, Saya lihat artikel-artikel Anda banyak yang belum di-interwiki-kan ke Wikidata & saya sudah meng-interwiki-kan ke Wikidata seluruh artikel yang sebelumnya belum di-interwiki-kan ke Wikidata tersebut. Mohon lain kali agar Anda sendiri yang meng-interwiki-kan artikel buatan Anda ke Wikidata karena hal tersebut dapat membantu orang untuk mengetahui apakah artikel tersebut sudah dibuat di Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia atau tidak.

Untuk informasi lebih lanjut mengenai Wikidata, silahkan lihat ini: Wikipedia:Wikidata

--Glorious Engine (talk) 02:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anindya Bakrie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anindya Bakrie, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 1292simon (talk) 22:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anindya Bakrie (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anindya Bakrie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anindya Bakrie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kungkang! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeromeenriquez (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anindya Bakrie

Hello, Kungkang. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anindya Bakrie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anindya Bakrie

Hello, Kungkang. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anindya Bakrie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PT Gayamakmur Lestari

The article PT Gayamakmur Lestari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is not clear that this company even exists, and at any rate there is no evidence its existence was ever meaningful. The company shows no active web presence or usable references. Archives of the included home pages show only "Under Construction" pages. It is not even clear what the company actually makes or does. As noted by template, it is an orphan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Doprendek (talk) 03:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PT Gayamakmur Lestari (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PT Gayamakmur Lestari (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]