User talk:LMGHS Webmaster

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/24.215.169.176 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Şłџğģő 14:59, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to The Leon M. Goldstein High School for the Sciences. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Şłџğģő 15:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of the websites of artists is not promotion of products or services. It is educational information about the creators of artwork in the school's art collection! Sincerely, LMGHS Webmaster

Please read the "vehicle for advertising or promotion" link above, then read WP:COI and WP:SOCK. You are in violation of several policies. Şłџğģő 15:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also please read reliable sources. It would be more fitting to include a newspaper article about the gallery than the artists' websites to support the inclusion of their works. It is absolutely inappropriate to reference the artists' websites to demonstrate their notability as articles. —C.Fred (talk) 15:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Leon M. Goldstein High School for the Sciences, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is adding revisions that are true and information a conflict of interest. Again, I am the designated webmaster of the school - our should have the right to be sure that the information about LMG on Wikipedia is both true and up-to-date. Including web links about an artist's work does not promote a service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LMGHS Webmaster (talk • contribs)

Promotion is not the only reason that a link can run afoul of the external link guidelines. Links that are off-topic are also inappropriate—and links to artists' websites in an article that is not about the artists are off topic. —C.Fred (talk) 15:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR, and the reverts are policy violations. What's the holdup, exactly? Şłџğģő 15:45, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, these changes are additions of factual, up-to-date information about Leon M. Goldstein High School for the Sciences. Does SluggoOne have any direct affiliation or knowledge of the school? If you need further proof of my position I will provide it. Sincerely, LMGHS Webmaster (Paul Wortman)

Does SluggoOne have any direct affiliation or knowledge of the school? No. Now read WP:OWN, yet another policy you've violated. This is starting to get ridiculous. Şłџğģő 16:12, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About your username

You have asserted that you are the webmaster for your high school. Other users have raised questions about whether your username complies with Wikipedia's policy on username. How are you able to verify your claim? Do you have a staff email address that you would be able to mail the foundation from? —C.Fred (talk) 15:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REALNAME includes instructions on where to email the volunteer response team to handle this. —C.Fred (talk) 16:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To verify the information please go to the school website - http://www.lmghs.org/apps/staff/ - you will find my name and information in the faculty/staff list. I can email you from both a staff email and the email I used for this account. What is the foundation email address do you want me to write to; and what information should I include in the email? Sincerely, Paul Wortman

I've already verified that a person of that name is on the staff at LMGHS. That does not confirm that you are the person you assert to be. The verification would need to come from the HS staff account, since you're alleging affiliation with the school. The important information to note is that you are who you say you are, you are the school's webmaster, and could an OTRS volunteer please put a notation on your user talk page to note that the account has been vetted. Follow the link above; it has the email address.

Additionally, there are a few policies that you'll want to look over, since they apply in your situation and based on your edit history:

WP:Ownership of articles: Nobody owns or has primary editing privileges over an article. Anybody can edit articles, regardless of their affiliation with a subject. If anything, editors need to edit more carefully when they are related to the subject than when they aren't.
WP:Conflict of interest: How to edit carefully when you are related to the article's subject.
WP:Verifiability: An article doesn't (alas) always contain what is true; it may be limited to what can be verified in…
WP:Reliable sources: The benchmark for whether a source can be used to support text in an article.
WP:Self-published sources: Additional restrictions when the source is writing about itself.

One other note: When leaving comments on talk pages, please put four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment. That automatically adds your signature and the time of the message. It makes it easy to follow the conversation and see who said what and when. —C.Fred (talk) 16:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A slightly overdue welcome

Welcome!

Hello, LMGHS Webmaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 16:09, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear C.Fred, Thank you for verifying my position. I do not understand why including links that provide further information for educational use about the artists who created to important works of art in the school art collection is inappropriate. Please explain as it is not clear in the page that was mentioned. Sincerely, LMGHSwebmaster (Paul W)

WP:ELNO, point #14: "Lists of links to manufacturers, suppliers or customers." While the artist of a gallery work is not a supplier per se, it's the same premise. In the case of one of the artists, he has an article on Wikipedia: the internal link to his article is the appropriate place for readers who want additional information on the artist to find it. —C.Fred (talk) 16:25, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, although I think that the websites with in-depth information about the artists would have been useful for people who visit the LMGHS Wikipedia information page. I will not add them as it isn't that essential to the school. Sincerely, LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 18:51, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

LMGHS Webmaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

24.215.169.176 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

PeterSymonds

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: This username has been blocked directly for violation of the username policy. OTRS will need to review your email before the block can be lifted. —C.Fred (talk) 20:57, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I sent an email to info-en-q@wikimedia.org from the school email from schools.gov.nyc (NYC Department of Education employee email) LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I will change my user name if that is an issue, but would like your help in picking an approved name. Again, all information I have added and modified is factual. Other minor modifications were added to make the page read more clearly. The additions of the website links of the artists in our school collection were added for purely educational purposes, but will not be added again since you say they are promotional links for the artists services - the links are not essential about LMGHS. Thank you for your consideration of my request}} LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 02:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

I have unblocked you, as we have received the email in question. I will contact an administrator to see if he can assist you more properly. NW (Talk) 15:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I am still unable to use the account. Will I need to change the user name or can it remain as is? I appreciate the assistance. LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 20:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide the exact error message you're getting? I suspect it's an issue with an autoblock, but we can't fix it unless you copy the message it gives you when it refuses your edit. —C.Fred (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The message I get mentions an autoblock affecting my computer IP address when I try to use the editing functions. What should I do?

Secure login You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia due to an autoblock affecting your IP address.

This is because someone using this internet address or shared proxy server was blocked. The ability of all users on this IP address to edit pages has been automatically suspended to prevent abuse by the blocked party. Innocent users are sometimes caught in an autoblock. It may be the case that you have done nothing wrong.

A user of this IP address was blocked by PeterSymonds for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

I also have this message, referring to my user page being deleted:

User:LMGHS Webmaster From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference: 11:51, August 1, 2010 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) unblocked "LMGHS Webmaster (talk | contribs)" ‎ (OTRS received) View full log This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 15:58, July 31, 2010 Beeblebrox (talk | contribs) deleted "User:LMGHS Webmaster" ‎ (even if true, this is not appropriate)

Thank you for your assistance LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 20:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the autoblock message had more specific information. Regardless, I have traced the autoblock and lifted it. If it's still in effect, let me know. I'm going to look at the user page right now. —C.Fred (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the user page, I'd go ahead and recreate it. I'd avoid calling yourself the "official" account of LMGHS. I would mention your affiliation with the school, and I would mention that OTRS has verified the affiliation. —C.Fred (talk) 20:57, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance, instructions, and advice. LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 22:41, 1 August 2010 (UTC) I added the source of the reproduction of the painting - I hope that it is sufficient. I think it's important to include the image as a reference to how Maroger painted and what he looked like since the article is a biography of an artist. Thank you for you assistance and advice.[reply]

Image tagging for File:Jacques Maroger SelF-Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jacques Maroger SelF-Portrait.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:11, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the website source of the reproduction of the painting. It is a self-portrait and was painted by Jacques Maroger circa 1960.LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 19:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Jacques Maroger SelF-Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jacques Maroger SelF-Portrait.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To Magog the Ogre:

Please explain how to correct this issue as I am very confused about what to do - your message is attached regarding the use of a digital reproduction of an oil painting by Jacques Maroger (a self-portrait) on the Wiki page about Maroger.

I have added this to explain the use of the image, is this enough?

"This image is a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the person who created the image..."

The artist Jacques Maroger created this image - it is an oil painting. Jacques Maroger died in 1962. He has no heirs. No claim of copyright on the painting can be found. The image is in use on several sites related to Jacques Maroger, his painting mediums research, and his students and proteges.

Thank very much for your assistance.

Sincerely, LMGHS Webmaster

On Nov 10, 2011, at 11:48 AM, MediaWiki Mail wrote:

Dear LMGHS Webmaster,

The Wikipedia page "User talk:LMGHS Webmaster" has been changed on 10 November 2011 by Magog the Ogre, with the edit summary: {{subst:di-no fair use rationale-notice|1=Jacques Maroger SelF-Portrait.jpg}} LMGHS Webmaster (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK; I've opened up a discussion to ask some other people about what to do here: Wikipedia:Non-free content review#File:Jacques Maroger SelF-Portrait.jpg. You can follow the discussion there. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:34, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:LMGHS Webmaster/David Newton (artist) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zach Vega (talk to me) 23:27, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:David Newton, Self Portrait; Oil on Panel, 1980s.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:David Newton, Self Portrait; Oil on Panel, 1980s.jpg, which you've sourced to Newton, David. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Self Portrait, Oil on Panel, Circa 1982.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Self Portrait, Oil on Panel, Circa 1982.jpg, which you've sourced to Newton, David. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist)

Hello LMGHS Webmaster. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "David Newton (artist)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Condition of Unblock

Hi. I noticed that you were blocked for a username violation 4 years ago, and unblocked with the condition that you change the username to one that meets our username guidelines. It appears that you have yet to do this. It's also highly possible that you're editing topics where you have WP:COI, which is improper whether you change your username or not. It is vital that when unblocked with conditions, that you follow through with those conditions immmediately ... and that involves changing your username the panda ɛˢˡ” 17:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@EatsShootsAndLeaves: Where do you see the username change as a condition of the unblock? I see the unblock as per OTRS action related to the username and verification thereof; I don't see anywhere the unblock is conditional on the username change. (Don't forget that the username issue would be per the 2010 version of the policy, not the current one.)

IMHO, I agree that a username like "(firstname) at LMGHS" would be more compliant with the current policy, but this might be an exceptional case where the username, styled as a role account, is acceptable—so long as only one person uses the account. —C.Fred (talk) 18:29, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this is a receipt for your REFUND? :)

Greetings! I saw your request for undeletion, and I have granted it. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist) has been restored. —C.Fred (talk) 18:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Newton (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David Newton (artist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David Newton (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Newton (artist)

Hello, LMGHS Webmaster. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "David Newton".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Onel5969, I cannot find the codes you referred to in order to remove them and prevent deletion of this article about David Newton. I have been very busy over the past year and have not had a chance to complete the article about David Newton. Please give me more and his widow, Suzanne Newton more time to complete this submission. Thank you very much for your attention and consideration.