User talk:LaWr123

This is LaWr123's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The McClure Twins (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube videos cannot be used as reliable sources, and the mainstream sources listed are nowhere near sufficient to support the claims made in the article. This subject is not suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The McClure Twins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The McClure Twins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 14:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LaWr123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brad v 14:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have a response to you help desk question which I assume is related to the above information.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:18, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The McClure Twins (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not shown to be notable. Too soon at best.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The McClure Twins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The McClure Twins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The McClure Twins

Hello, LaWr123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The McClure Twins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted submission

The McClure Twins , which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Killiondude (talk) 04:54, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on page creation

Thank you so much for the kind words re: Scottie Beam, I do appreciate it. I also appreciate you contributing to her article! However, unsourced information can't remain on pages, especially biographies of living people. I'm going to add a "citation needed" tag to the sentence you added; please find a source and cite it when you can.

In terms of article creation and my advice to you: sourcing is absolutely vital to deciding when an article is ready to be moved out of draftspace. Generally, if I come across someone in pop culture that I'm unfamiliar with, I will look them up on Wiki. If they don't have a Wikipedia article, but there are several Google hits with coverage of them in WP:RS, I'll just go ahead and make the page. Sometimes I'll *want* to make a page for someone who doesn't have enough sources to meet Wiki standards for notability (i.e. WP:GNG, in which case I'll create a draft and incubate it there until sources appear.

Also, just in case you were unaware -- you don't have to go through the AfC process if your sourcing is sound. You can just move WP:MOVE the page into mainspace yourself, but please note that if the article subject doesn't meet the notability guidelines, it will surely be deleted. If it isn't deleted right away, it will likely be deleted when it is reviewed by the new page reviewers (I know about this process well because I am one). I use WP:RSP to get a sense of how sources are evaluated. It saves time and heartache to make sure the sourcing is strong, because my pages about Black women are sent to WP:AFD more than any other pages I write.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if there's any other way I can be helpful.

Thanks! Citrivescence (talk) 23:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is extremely helpful. Thank you so much!

You're absolutely right. I completely forgot about sourcing the addition to the Scottie Beam article. I'll be on the lookout for credible sources.

Otherwise, keep moving the culture forward!

LaWr123 (talk)