User talk:La Pianista/Archive 14

Navigation


User	Talk	Humor	Userboxen	Guestbook	Contributions	Adoptee classroom	Bling	Sandbox

Instruction creep

Please assume good faith. If any of my edits have seemed unconstructive, please keep a cool head and notify me of my mistakes promptly. I try to be helpful and if I cause a problem, it is purely accidental; in no way are my edits meant to be offensive to anyone. Besides myself.
Please sign your posts. Sign with four tildes to record your username and timestamp. Sinebot is watching, you know.
Respond to all messages at the place where the discussion began. Meaning, if I post a message on your talk page, respond to it there, and if you post on my talk page, I will respond to it here, unless you specify otherwise.
Nonsense gladly accepted. I like receiving messages, and I promise not to bite. Even if you think your questions are trivial, they may not be, at least to me. :)
Place all new messages at the bottom of the page. Clicking on the link below will do this automatically for you.
My page is constantly being monitored by dedicated talk page stalkers. Some of them (I probably don't know them all) are The ed17, IceUnshattered, Juliancolton, Nutiketaiel, Sonia, and Little Mountain 5 off the top of my head. Most of the time they lurk in the dark, but some of them might respond to your comments before I do. Don't be alarmed though; they might provide you with better responses than I can.
Email me if the matter is confidential. But please include the word "Wikipedia" in the e-mail title so that I won't inadvertently delete it or have my spam-eater destroy it.

Start a new topic by clicking here

Archives
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30 • 31

VaNdAlIsM? WhAt vAnDaLiSM?

I say, not guilty!

nnoott gguuiilltty!!!!!!

I say nay! nay nay nay nay nay!

so... Michael Dukakis or Morrissey, who will be be? I support both in the 1973 Latvian Election . --Addenbridge (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 19:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah um what? That makes no sense, pal....and Pianista, thanks. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 19:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck...how...? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ɑ: ɑ: ɑ: ¡¡sloqwʎs ɐdI —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...fun! :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ˈpəəpuɪ —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, stop! I hate reading upside down! :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

¡¡¡SӤҴЗ8 SӤҴЗ8 SӤҴЗ8 SӤҴЗ8 ¿ʎlr O

(that translates to "BEANS BEANS BEANS..." couldn't find the right symbols, lol.) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are MEAN! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 00:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*gasp* No way! —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(dent upon Pianista's piano) Incorrigible. That's what you are. Look it up if you have too, but that's what you are. :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 00:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looked it up (hey, I knew what it means, pal, but....just for reference...):

"incorrigible (not comparable)

Impossible to correct or set aright. (refer: Note on usage)
Incurably bad.
Impervious to correction by punishment or pain."

So...where does "Pianists need to be complimented regularly" come into play? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought that for you, pain was a compliment. =) Boy oh boy, could that be taken REALLY sickly or WHAT... :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 00:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

................................

You know, I'm desperately tempted to nuke your talk page again...

Persuade me not to. Quick. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL well...nuking it would probably be an act of terrorism...and then the FBI would chase you...and you;d have to flee the U.S. to a country that is not friendly to the U.S.....so you'd have to go to Iran or something....so you'd have to divorce/break off the marriage with biblio (:D)....and your internet would be censored....meaning less/no Wikipedia access...which would mean less/not talking to the coolest person alive, Ed 17. :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 00:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And...so...forgive me if I'm mistaken, but is the above body of text, in and of itself, not a pure exhibition of such "incorrigible" qualities as you have accused me of? :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa...very complex sentence...but yes, it is....only because I am describing your actions. :P —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Ed's most pitiable dent) And those aforementioned actions do not apply to yourself, that is, the editor that you allegedly are? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

—La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes really. I'm so cool that I am allowed to nuke every user talk page that I want without fear of any consequences. :) Sorry for the delay, my internet died for some reason. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can, too. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, the FBI is coming for you right now. They called me for information on you, so that's how I know. :P RUN! :D :D :D :D Lol! :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's been ten minutes, and they're not yet here. How do I know that you, most honorable sir, are not merely bluffing? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, did you just get an e/c out of that? I hope so... :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Ed'z dent) I did, but I think it came from this very curt message.

That's the vandal-fighter's world... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? What's with his FBI stuff?--What!?Why?Who? (talk) 02:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's all a joke between my friend Ed and I, WWW. :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. No FBI anywhere, though they should go after Pianista on a charge of severe sarcasticness to fellow Americans. :P —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pst! There most certainly exists a word called "sarcasticness," since, after all, only the dumbest people in the world would use the correct word, "sarcasm." —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 03:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

........................................................... I hate it when my fingers work faster than my mind. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and re 60.50.17.207 (talk · contribs)

Thanks for reverting on my user page. Also on another note, he's a previously blocked IP for edit warring on the Air Asia page, yet came back and is reverting to his preferred version against consensus. Would you be able to look at the situation, thanks --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 02:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for ur respone.. I have no idea why the user User talk:Arnzy looking trouble on me... anyway, hope u can make some guide on him. I'm wondering something happen on him? Thx... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.17.207 (talk) 02:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding to my questions about editing.--What!?Why?Who? (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry? I'm not an administrator, so I cannot block this IP...

However, I would recommend against blocking him. It seems to me that his edits have not been unconstructive (although his comments on your (Arnzy's) talk page may be a little too sharp).

The nature of his comments, though perhaps essentially good-natured, were what led me to remove them. When reverting vandalism via a bot at high speeds, mistakes are a common malady. I may have wrongly labeled the IP's edits as vandalism, and if so, I apologize.

Arnzy, I see no reason why the IP's edits have to be undone. I understand that he has broken WP:3RR, but WP:COOLDOWN blocks are generally not seen to be productive.

Anonymous editor, you might try civilly asking Arnzy why he reverted your edits. You two may continue the discussion - but please, do not WP:WAR.

Thank you,

—La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the IP has already been blocked. Have I misunderstood something? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@ What!?Why?Who?

You're very much welcome. But consider putting {{helpme}} on your talk page next time you need a question answered quickly. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yaya, you are right.. there is not everyone like you so open mind to accept other opinion some of the administrator like Tanthalas39 is brainless I can say.. Is lazy for me to keep on falling trouble at here.. Just something to let that admin know block me is useless n pls check the history of that user to ask you do so... Hopefully he can nice as like u La Pianista, Thx.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.29.40 (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You evaded a block?

But I suppose IP addresses change regularly...but please try to stay away from edit-warring. That can get you into deep trouble, especially if you continue insulting admins - like you have just done - which can get you in deep waters fast. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As it was previously blocked for edit warring at the Air Asia page previously before being blocked again not too long ago, if he does come back and starts again on the Air Asia, I and the other editors at the page may have to look at partial protection of the page, Cheers. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 02:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yaya... I'm understand ur meaning But as for me nor admin Before i respect to him/her, he/she should respect back to us so the theory is easy, just the admin is brainless as i can say nth should i worry here because i'm telling the true Hopefully the admin can understand btw, are you 1 of the person incharge in wiki? Thx...

If you're asking whether I'm an administrator, no, not yet. It's personal choice, really - several editors have been willing to nominate me, but I don't feel comfortable with such a job...as of now. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@IP evading the block, calling the admin "brainless" is considered a attack. I have left a reminder on your talk page and Please refrain from making attacks. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 03:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wow.. Ic, is better to enjoy ur life i think? hehe, Is having fun that chat with u here.. :) I think i have to go.. something to let u know, that user Arnzy is keep on annoying me and wasting my time... =.= —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.29.40 (talk) 03:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay - I was busy for a while.

Anon, though I thank you for your compliments, I would recommend against insulting other editors, no matter how much they may disagree with you. That will only provoke an admin to block you even faster. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 03:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just notice that the user Arnzy is quite hardworking to submit the complain to others admin wondering is it someone pay him to do so? another hopeless admin appear.. Sigh... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.22.0 (talk) 04:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typical

Did you even read my comment on Shaul avron's page? I was apologizing for the remarks made by an anti-Semitic vandal. Of course, you probably just scanned the "recent edits" page, and reverted everything by the evil IP addresses. And I'm sure that my IP is a popular one for reverting by bored "vandal" fighters, with nothing better to do. Unfortunately, I can't say that I'm surprised.--24.129.100.84 (talk) 03:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I undid my own edit immediately after seeing the confusion. I thought I had removed the message on your talk page, but I fear that I have not.

Sorry for any hard feelings this may have caused. I also apologize on behalf of my fellow vandal fighters. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 03:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted! ^_^ Unfortunately, this happens a lot, so you can probably understand why I sound so bitter. ==^_^==--24.129.100.84 (talk) 03:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you create an account then? I'm sure the wiki would be more than glad to have a user like you on-board. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 03:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in this?

I was looking for a new article to make, and found this one you might like in Wikipedia:Requested articles/music. Guess what the name is: La Pianiste Qui Rêvait D'humanité :) Interested in making it? Not sure if it qualifies WP:Notability, though. Chamal ^talk 14:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's interesting! But - yeah, as you say, it probably won't meet WP:N. From what I gather via Google, she's supposed to be a French MySpace pianist...right? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 20:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I dropped the idea. I'll have to find something else to make, since I have nothing better to do than go around Wikipedia making start-class articles. My internet connection has slowed down, so huggling is out for the time being :) Chamal ^talk 00:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it past your bedtime?

The section header says it all, but I also have to comment on this...what are you going to do, drop pianos on the vandals who dare to cross swords with the Huggle-wielding Pianista? :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it past your bedtime, inferior Twinkle-wielding Ed-meister? :D :D :D

Yah, that's the general message. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No: I'm in college, so I can stay up as LONG as I want. :P And I'm perfectly happy with TW, thank you. Plus, which one of us has DYK's to their credit? ...what's that? Do I hear the word "Ed" coming from your mouth? :D :D :D :D hahaha :P

Just checking.

ummmmmm wow. I could have had the username hidden and I still would have known who it was! :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude. Snooping through my contribs again?! :D :D :D

I've already got a hubby to be reckoned with, fyi. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mayyyybe.

Wait. First: I thought that you rejected him? Second: what crime must I answer to biblio for? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 05:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You'd be stalking his trophy ~~wife~~ ~~fiancee~~ whatever I am.

Be careful, now. You don't know when one of those 'crats are gonna come out from some dark nook and whack you with the BANHAMMER OF DOOM... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:08, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But....but....what happened to us as ... a ...couple? WHERE DID IT GO? :) Oh boy, am I going to get slammed for this in your next edit, but it was worth it. :D

Well, if I don't get whacked with one now, I don't think that I ever will! "Banhammer of Doom"? That's very creative...I'm actually impressed! :P —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 05:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...

Man, all these references to wiki-romance is starting to creep me out. I said that a dozen times, but still...I'm creeped out.

Ed, dearie, when was the last time you slept or ate? Have you seen a doctor recently? How is your health/mental state?

Anyhow...ahem...the slamming you were waiting for...

Not much, but it is an attempt at driving you insane. Watch the bouncy ball Ed, watch the bouncy ball... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent for my sanity) Okay, I'll stop. You know that they were all in good fun, and I have no plans to make a trip to Texas. :))
...then you go and call me "dearie". :P Anyway, I last slept 17 hours ago, and I will be getting off this in 5 minutes or so to take a shower and go to bed...my normal routine...so I think that I'm ok! :-) What, one compliment from me to you automatically makes you wonder about my mental state? Lol!
LOL you just made my day, and I'm only 25 minutes into it. :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 05:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dangit, if you believed I gave any credit to your "overtures," Ed, I must seem really dim, wouldn't I?

Then, of course...

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D ad infinitum... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Pianista, dearie, when was the last time you slept or ate? Have you seen a doctor recently? How is your health/mental state? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 05:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is yours, dear Eddy-kun? I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 23:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were supposed to comment on "I've already got a hubby to be reckoned with, fyi." lol :) And btw, I answered that above... —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(chéri, if you want be to do something, it's totally up to me to choose one of three, and only three options: do what you want, not do what you want, or ruin your life. Comprends?) Anyways, I choose no comment on the subject of our...eh...etto...dear 'crat. It would be a lose-lose situation for me either way, ne? But since I'm an absolute idiot, I think I'll comment. My comment is as follows: ... I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 01:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Icy,

I, that is, the editor that I allegedly am, have considerable difficulty in discerning the crux of the point at which you are attempting to get. May you please most courteously elaborate the point that you are trying to get across so that I can better ascertain what you are meaning? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

La Pianista,

I, that is, the editor that I allegedly am, am not making any reasonable attempt that directs toward the creation of a logical point or stance upon this situation. Thus, it shall be, in any reasonable situation, infinitely improbable for one to discern any of the said points that you believe I am trying to get across. I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 02:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Methinks that you guys have been watching that red ball too much.... :P —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(unindent) Hyo-chan thinks she has been watching CNN far too closely for her sanity. I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 02:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obama just took Iowa. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And North Carolina is still *too close to call, even the day after! I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 19:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is within 1%! :) —Ed 17 (talk)— 20:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was fast, ed... -hits head on desk- Should I care, anyways? -rubs head- -dies of internal bleeding- Icy gone bye-bye... That's what I get for staying up till 1AM yesterday for election... I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 20:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL ouch that sounded painful! I stayed up late to watch it too. :) —Ed 17 (talk)— 20:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP 122.148.180.50

I see you have reported him; thanks for keeping an eye out. I am watching him at present and will block if he continues. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 05:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome! I get some crooked delight out of putting vandals in their place... :D :D :D

I actually use a tool called Huggle that automatically reports vandals for me. Perhaps you might look into it? You'll need administrator-granted rollback first, though. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:08, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately he/she did not learn. I am an administrator and as such I have blocked this editor (very temporarily) now. Hopefully they will return a little chastened. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 05:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pianista, you didn't realize that he was an admin from the "...will block if he continues" part? I'm disappointed in you.... =) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 05:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know...it's 11:30 here, and I'm bonked. Which partially explains the mentally-impaired message I sent you above... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 05:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it really doesn't explain it. Only an insane person could/would type that. :-))) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 05:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words, by the way. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 05:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(un-indent) *Gasp* You actually thought an admin was a newbie and tried to teach him about huggle and rollback??? This means a trout for you! Or maybe the stocks... BTW Ed, elections today, right? Hope you win ;) Chamal ^talk 16:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stocks.

The (non-existent) "Vote for Ed" buttons have been flying off the shelves, and polls show me with a support total of 0%!! Woot! They say that I will get a grand total of 340 + 220 - 560 electoral votes! :P —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 18:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obama is up 77-34 so far! YAY! :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) I know. Perhaps I was simply awed by Ed's romantic proclamation of his love that I simply could not think straight... :D :D :D

(after e/c) And yes, I find the Obama winning to be very exciting. My mum's a McCain gal, but I beg to differ. ;) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow, I doubt that. Somehow.

81-34! :D I was originally rooting for Biden, so guess who was really happy a few months back when Obama picked him for his running mate... :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PENNSY'S GONNA FALL TO OBAMA!!!! :D Today is a good day... —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow, eh? BTW, you hurt my feelings! :,( —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c)Somehow, eh? BTW, you hurt my feelings! :,(

(after e/c) While I was pondering the edit conflict, a thought occurred to me - should a presidential candidate be supporting another - especially when the former has only a handful of votes in his favor...? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I didn't name who I was thinking of...I could have been talking to Chamal, you know... :D

I threw in the towel. Didn't you hear? Everyone covered my exit. :P —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

long time, no see

Hi. How ae things, just want to say. YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hamilton won!!!!!!!!!!!

How are things?Chubbennaitor 16:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Everything's going swimmingly. :D :D :D

BTW...which Hamilton? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guess. Who is our F1 star in he UK? It has broken record viewings ad is huge news. Chubbennaitor 17:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Girls, not knowing their sports. I knew who he was talking about. :P —Ed 17 (talk)— 18:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pianista, no retort? I find myself disappointed by the lack of action on your part. :) —Ed 17, "Il Viquipedista", at your service.— 23:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Teh awesomest Huggle keeps me quite busy... :D :D :D

Hm. How about boys, not knowing our sports. Who famously won the 2000 International Frederic Chopin Piano Competition, skyrocketing him into classical music super-stardom? Who won the last Van Cliburn International Piano Competition (held right here in my hometown)? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would know if I was even local! American's aren't the greatest knowers of F1 even though you've had probably the most controversal race for a while. 2005 American Grand Prix. All the Michelin tyred cars had to pull out with only the Bridgestone cars starting-5. Chubbennaitor 07:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chubb, buddy-pal...

That made no sense to me whatsoever. Sorry. :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't know even if I was local! American's aren't the best people to understand F1. "Hang on, You've got to turn the corner". And european wives don't understand why their husbands watch cars go round in circles. American wives have to do the same although the cars are literally going round in circles. America's had the most controversial race recently. The 2005 United States Grand Prix - all the michelin tyre cars had to pull out. 5/6 started the race. Chubbennaitor 18:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		You are the king... er I meant queen of humor! Spittlespat 01:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow! Thanks Spittle! I must say, though, I perhaps deserve less than half of this award - after all, the majority of stupid comments come from...um...He who must not be named. Kapeesh? :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it. Just prove it. Who started the nuclear fireball? Who put in a red bouncy ball above? Who types an interesting and funny but weird edit summary every time they log in or out? :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you two are calling each other dearies, you're not flirting are you?...--Spittlespat 02:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help!! I'm being smashed by this ball!! CURSE YOU ED17!!!!!!--Spittlespat 02:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technically we are flirting, but we don't mean it like that...we are using the word to insult each other. Like that's any different from normal!

Hey, you put the ball there, not me. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't think someone would be too happy >^.-< Negligible enough that I didn't recognize its significance I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 03:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I haven't yet heard from him. So, I guess I'm an estranged - er...thing-a-ma-jig. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 21:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

真可愛!! A thing-a-ma-jig! Truly cute! -shifty eyes- Well, I can't tell all the gossip to Suzu, though, now that someone's seeming to give his estranged "thing-a-ma-jig" some peace, ne? I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 21:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c, this is getting worse than the golden days of WP:AN/K...) Ouch. You have my sympathy...losing your spouse must be hard. :P —Ed 17 (talk)— 21:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuh-uh. I was the one who jilted him. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 21:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[now, Icy, remember your debating instructions from 5th grade...] I respectfully disagree! My first reason is -insert text evidence here- My second reason is -insert MOAR of that- and my third reason is -the only one that exists!- Yay! I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 22:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um...debaters don't normally go "Yay" after a ~~victory~~ what they believe to be a victory? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but fifth graders do... Not that I'm one of them anymore... I c eUnshattered ^{[ t ]} 22:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies

~~Pharaoh, see WP:DTTR. Thank you!~~ —Ed 17 (talk)— 22:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't that a good edit? —Ed 17 (talk)— 22:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c)I'm sorry? I think we both clashed on Huggle, reverting the same edit. :)

No hard feelings, btw.

(after e/c) Thanks, Ed. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my sincere apologies.I was also trying to revert and warn vandal using huggle.I am very sorry and hopeful you accept my apology.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Clash"? We aren't talking about Halo now, are we? :P —Ed 17 (talk)— 22:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no harm taken. :) Good luck with Huggle - it's pretty dense out there, with 19 rpm. Cheers!

@Ed ..............................

w/e —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=) Never played Halo before with swords before? :) —Ed 17 (talk)— 22:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c)BTW, Ed dearest ha-HA!, have you ever heard of the MMORPG called Wikipedia? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Dearest"? Our relationship is moving along awfully quick, doncha think? Maybe you should slow down a bit... :D :D :D :D

I might have...isn't the tagline something like "the free MMORPG that anyone can play as long as you aren't blocked or inside of China?" :) —Ed 17 (talk)— 22:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. Pretend that a really nasty "creeper" is here - I couldn't type one without dying laughing. :D :D :D

Perhaps. But it could also be "the free MMORPG that anyone can play as long as you aren't blocked or still using a lame version of teh pwnage, Huggle". —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psh...you just can't think up a proper retort... :P

Doubtful. -_- That was just meeeeeeeeean. Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeean.... :)

Nope becuase I knew that you were going to have to fix it...so I waited. :D :D :D :D ha-HA —Ed 17 (talk)— 22:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent for the sanity of Ed's weak mind) Uh-huh. So, you think you can read my mind? Prove it. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At this moment, you are thinking about how much you want to leave biblio and come away with me. Hey, you asked... :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 (talk)— 23:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, way off. Try again. I will give you three tries - if you cannot guess what is on my mind by the end of your three tries, I shall be compelled to nuke your page, causing you to to die by severe lol. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are thinking about how much you want to hurt/kill me because of all of these "I love you" jokes? —Ed 17, "Il Viquipedista", at your service.— 23:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*confetti* Correct! Actually, a more correct answer would have been "You are thinking about how much you want to drive an axe into my skull and bury me behind a brick wall, leaving your black cat to consume my entrails." But, close enough. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...that's a little violent... =/ I think that I am going to start to lock the door at night... :) —Ed 17, "Il Viquipedista", at your service.— 23:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PING!

If I were Pianista, I'd check my e-mail. :) —Ed 17 (talk)— 22:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ed! The advice helps - I'll pop in next month and see if the situation's the same. ;) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem pal. :) —Ed 17, "Il Viquipedista", at your service.— 23:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PING! You have new messages at my talk page. :) —Ed 17 _{(Il Viquipedista)}— 02:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sure you can call me WWW. it's easier to type.--What!?Why?Who? (talk) 02:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't complain about ME stalking YOU anymore. :) —Ed 17 _{(Il Viquipedista)}— 03:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

............................................................................................................... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 19:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thanksgiving. Merry Christmas.--What!?Why?Who? (talk) 20:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A little early, pal. :) Also, Pianista, what would you think of a sig like this => —Ed 17 ^{(T & C)}

Also, you want to shorten your sig? I think that I know how...Instead of what you have, try:

—[[User:La Pianista|'''La Pianista''']] ('''[[User talk:La Pianista|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/La Pianista|C]]•[[User:La Pianista/g|S]]''')

Anyway, cheers! —Ed 17 _{(Il Viquipedista)}— 21:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's good, but I think the "17" link would stand out better if it were a different color. (And, what, the "Viquipedista" is not good enough for you?) :D :D :D

Never mind the parenthesis - it's great. My alter-ego escapes every once in a while... ;) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and thanks for the sig note. I got a bit superfluous with the bold tags there. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

K, and it just seemed out of place to me... =/

It escapes quite often, dear.

No problem lol! :D Except that it still is—I think that you only need the ''' at the beginning and end, right? ...right? —Ed 17 _{(Il Viquipedista)}— 00:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You think. It seems a little of my perfectionism has rubbed off on you, my ~~dearest~~ second-dearest. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Il Viquipedista" is what seemes out of place...sorry.

You? A perfectionist? Yeah, do you really expect me to believe that? You use Huggle, meaning that you know that you are going to make a mistake at some point. :D

I can live with second. First place is an inantimate object, so I can definitely live with second. :) —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 22:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh crud, I gave you hope... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:D :D :D :D Too late now, can't take it back! —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 06:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, really? *Snatches Ed's hope and flings it out the window* Okay, the preceding asterisk clause can only happen if a) hope is a concrete entity, b) there is a window open, and c) Ed is still here while I annoy him. But, it's still possible. :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 06:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait...explain just when, under what circumstances, hope becomes a "concrete entity". What, after a miracle from God? :O Good luck with explaining...! —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 06:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Ed's ...whatever dent) ....Ignoring you for a while. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 06:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]