User talk:Lackope

Lackope, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lackope! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petar Popović. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 25 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Serbs page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Serbian South African

Hello, Lackope,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Serbian South African should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian South African .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, —Swpb^talk 17:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Language encoding

Before changing the language encoding codes on Balkan articles, you should discuss the matter on the talk pages, or perhaps even on the various Wikiproject talk pages. As far as I can tell, it doesn't really matter for the pronunciation, so it is a purely political point. I'm not sure it is worth the effort to get everyone to agree on this, because it will cause a lot of trouble and, as I mentioned, it really doesn't matter for the pronunciation. So, why bother? On the other hand, if there is a sound reason for standardizing the language encoding on "Serbo-Croatian", it needs to be discussed. Brianyoumans (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 23:50, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning. This edit warring is completely unacceptable. I don't know which of you is "right" about the facts, but both you and User:ChumleeS are going about this the wrong way. If you continue to revert each other you will definitely be blocked. Instead of reverting further, I would encourage you to explain your point of view at the ANI thread or any other community discussion page that you and ChumleeS are both comfortable using. Dragons flight (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed both blocks since neither of you had edited after my warning. The warning still stands. Now is the time to come together and explain what is going on with the edit warring. Dragons flight (talk) 18:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for For continuing to edit war over Serbian nationalities. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Dragons flight (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I was unclear before. Edit warring is not an acceptable approach to resolving one's differences. I invited you to discuss the issue, but you haven't engaged in any meaningful discussion. (Simply saying you're right and other are wrong is not meaningful discussion.) In general, we need sources to establish facts, and when there are disputes (as obviously exist in the case), people need to be willing to discuss the issue, either at the discussion page of the article you are editing, at a community forum (e.g. WP:ANI / WP:BLPN), or at the talk page of the user you have a conflict with (e.g. User talk:ChumleeS). See also: Dispute Resolution.

Ethnic and national identity is an important issue for many people, and hence it behooves us to get it right. In general, I would encourage you to A) more often cite your sources, and B) explain the rational behind the changes you have been making at an appropriate discussion page. Right now, I honestly don't know whether you or User:ChumleeS is right with respect to the facts. The reason I don't know, is because neither of you is giving sufficient explanations for your reverts to evaluate the justification behind them. That is something that is going to end if you (and ChumleeS) want to continue editing these pages. If you want to start giving an explanation of what is going on at Serbs, Montenegrin American, etc. then you can do so here, or you can wait for the block to end and explain the justification for the edits on one (or more) other appropriate talk pages. Dragons flight (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Serbs of the Republic of Macedonia – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Legacypac (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbs in Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pero Antic

Hi, I have realised you have reveretd my edit I deleted Antic from the Serbs in the Republic of Macedonia. If I know he has Bulgarian and Macedonian citizenship and that is proved. I did not find any neutral source in the WEB confirming he is a Serb. In the article Pero Antic is also no such claim. Could you provide a good source supporting your opinion as for example an interview with him or with his parents. 212.117.45.70 (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 03:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add an unblock request to this page, following the instructions in the link above. You are not doing that. You are adding the unblock and accepting it at the same time, which is fatuous on its face. If you persist in doing that, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can you block me as sock puppet without valid explanation ??? Lackope (talk) 18:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)lackope[reply]

You were confirmed as the same individual as User:Mitrale89 by a checkuser.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And details of the investigation are at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ulichar/Archive. —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

based on what I have confirmed that I am the same individual with that account???This is not fair because I'm blocked based on assumption Lackope (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)lackope[reply]

I don't have nothing with this account and my account is not sock puppet Lackope (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)lackope[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lackope (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is not sock puppet, please unblock me. Lackope (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)lackope[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not address the technical evidence. Chillum 21:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lackope (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

based on what I have confirmed that I am the same individual with that account?This is not fair because I'm blocked based on assumption . I'm not a sock puppet . Lackope (talk) 00:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)lackope[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted above: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ulichar/Archive. Kuru (talk) 01:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Because of your persistent, repetitive unblock requests and comments, I have revoked access to this page. You may use WP:UTRS to appeal.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]