User talk:Laptopmaker

Hi, thanks for stopping by! Laptopmaker (talk) 18:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you. It's quite an enjoyable page, uncluttered by stuff!--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 19:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA

I closed your RFA because it falls under WP:NOTNOW, and with some of the vandalism warnings you had in your short history. It's a good idea not to readd it again. Secret ^account 19:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. One account per person - you know better than this. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 16:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laptopmaker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Uh What? How have I been abusing multiple accounts? Who am I a sock of? No one!? —Laptopmaker— 16:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Majority of edits in history are not useful. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laptopmaker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Uhm, I'm sorry, is that really a reason to block someone? You don't help Wikipedia. No one has bothered to help me at all, and now I'm blocked. Great. —Laptopmaker— 16:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Being a vandalism-only account is indeed a reason to block.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]