User talk:Larryzhao123

Your Revert

Thank you for reverting. The topics don't separate in mobile mode, at least not for me on some old archives. I tried to solve this problem by adding a new header, to no avail. I would've reverted myself, you were quicker. Best wishes. --Maresa63 (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Your Message on My Talk Page

Hi.

You removed my edit saying it was poorly referenced and removed the image, without explaining why in both cases. Neither was defamatory or controversial in any way. Why did you do these changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SineofTan (talk • contribs) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

SineofTan, I'll put the image on. I only meant to rev one of the edits but RW reverted all. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 20:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion on my last article

Hi,

I saw your request of speedy deletion on my article, but it's not something for promotion or things like that, all my articles are translation of italian article on wikipedia already approved. All these pages have several references. So i hope you can remove the tag. Thank you UrbanBio (talk 17:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Message from User:Wadiefong

Hello, Larryzhao123, I received a warning that I had vandalized a wiki page. Can you please help me? I am new to wikipedia editing. I edited the Uglydoll wiki page, as I actually own some of the handmade Uglydolls, as well as spoke to David Horvath (the co-creator of Uglydolls with Sun-Min Kim), to accurately add info to some of the characters on the page. I did add a reference to a photo, but then deleted it, due to privacy issues. Can you please tell me what I did wrong? I honestly did not intend to cause any harm. I am new to this platform. Any help would be greatly appreciated. If this is not the correct area to ask questions, please help and let me know how I can properly respond. Thank you. wadiefong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wadiefong (talk • contribs)

Responded to user on their talk page. ~ Tridwoxi (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Please

Refrain from editing another users comments. See the Talk page guidelines for more info. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

MJL, Sorry about this. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 23:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you explain why you reverted my edits?

Edits on John Mark Ramseyer's page are supported by multiple sources. I'm not saying anything here other than what appears in published, cited articles, and I don't know why you undid my edits. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, can you cite the sources? Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

They are cited as sources 7 and 8 within the article, from Straits Times and Inside Higher Ed. Other editors have been adding equivocating language to muddle the scholarly consensus, but this is not what is reflected in the cited sources. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

OK. I'll check it Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I found that the references contains the information. Thanks. Larryzhao123 (talk | contribs) 17:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Great! I appreciate your help. Have a good day. 58.140.209.16 (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Thanks for your clarification of your report, calling my attention to the edit filter log. It would be a good idea to mention things like that in the original report. Since you know where to look to see the evidence,and the person responding to the report doesn't, at the very least you can save them some trouble, and sometimes, as on this occasion, you can save them from missing the evidence altogether. JBW (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

JBW, Thanks. Larry Z Contact me my edits 21:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Larryzhao123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I'm not a LTA. I joined the English Wikipedia and I'm not a LTA. I really like to contribute to the encyclopedia. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Foreflight

Hello, Larryzhao123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Foreflight, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Foreflight

Hello, Larryzhao123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Foreflight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:User:Larryzhao123/fs game X

Template:User:Larryzhao123/fs game X has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 00:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Larryzhao123/sandbox

User:Larryzhao123/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Larryzhao123/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Larryzhao123/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Accused of "disruptive editing"

Hello,

I was accused of disruptive editing which I believe was wrong. Sometimes editing doesn't take because of weak wifi signals so I didn't think it went through. I made the minor edits again and then was rudely told to "stop the disruptive editing" and that my grammar was wrong, which it was not. I was also threatened with being blocked from further editing.

If people want it their own way, that is fine. I rarely make any edits so obviously I'm not out to cause trouble.

However, it would be civil to explain the situation rather than talk down to, make unkind remarks, or bully users.

Thank you kindly for listening. Jrfizzie (talk) 07:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)