User talk:Lavenderearlgrey

Welcome!

Hi Lavenderearlgrey! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Proposed deletion of Roger A. Weir

The article Roger A. Weir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that they meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the {{old prod}} template you removed, then "filled it in" so that it is more informative. This template alerts editors that the corresponding article is no longer eligible to be deleted through the proposed deletion process, and that the articles for deletion process should be used instead. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I wasn't quite sure of the process so I'm very thankful for your attention and assistance. Lavenderearlgrey (talk) 02:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be surprised if Onel5969 or another editor nominates it for deletion through the WP:Articles for deletion process. You might want to read WP:Deletion, WP:Notability, WP:Reliable sources, WP:Independent sources, and WP:Citing sources. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I'm anticipating such action. I believe I have profusely cited/sourced the content on the article. Do you have any particular advice for dealing with some of the issues raised by One15969? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavenderearlgrey (talk • contribs) 03:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to look at it now, perhaps you can ask Onel5969 on Talk:Roger A. Weir. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roger A. Weir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger A. Weir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger A. Weir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bodhi Tree Bookstore

Hi :) Congratulations on what looks like your first article, Bodhi Tree Bookstore — a massive effort (quite literally, almost 60K bytes in one go)! I've added a few maintenance tags to the article, with comments suggesting how I think the article could be improved, hope that's okay. I've also included some of the meta info (a couple of initial categories, short description, ratings). One issue I didn't tag is possible COI: I see you've declared your interest in Roger Weir. Given that he is mentioned in this article, you should probably also make a similar declaration about this subject, too. HTH, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - It's been a long work in progress – thanks to the sandbox ;) – I'm eager to review your recommendations for structure and improvements. I am still in the process of fine tuning citations and stylistics (and possible structural adjustments). Thanks again!! -- Lavenderearlgrey (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Sondheim Insprational Teacher Awards

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Stephen Sondheim Insprational Teacher Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. // Timothy :: talk 06:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roger A. Weir

Hello, Lavenderearlgrey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roger A. Weir".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 12:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:New Education Fellowship

Hello, Lavenderearlgrey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Education Fellowship, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Education Fellowship

Hello, Lavenderearlgrey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New Education Fellowship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]