User talk:Linde Place

This is Linde Place's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Light Rail In Stockholm (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Light Rail In Stockholm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Light Rail In Stockholm, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:40, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Linde Place! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:40, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Light Rail In Stockholm

Hello, Linde Place. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Light Rail In Stockholm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 19:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Laser brain. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Avicii, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 20:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Sweden. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Personal message:

You have now several times reverted the work of other editors while avoiding attempts to come into contact with you through talk-pages. Please refrain from doing so, as it is considered mandatory to engage other editors upon facing a content dispute. Carl Fredrik^talk 20:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Sweden shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 0x9fff00 (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please come into the talk page to Talk:2020 coronavirus outbreak in Sweden and join in the discussions about the page instead of just changing things the way you want them to appear, so we can have a civil discussion about the page and not going into some edit warring state, again. --Benighted77 (talk) 12:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Linde Place reported by User:0x9fff00 (Result: ). Thank you. —0x9fff00 (talk) 16:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Sweden, you may be blocked from editing. Carl Fredrik^talk 16:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Sweden

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!

We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts.
We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate. Currently there are two active communities:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine (talk — The general medical community)
Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19 (talk — A temporary COVID-19 community)

Please join up!

Best regards, Carl Fredrik^talk 09:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Sweden medical cases. Carl Fredrik^talk 14:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Sweden medical cases. Carl Fredrik^talk 09:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for edit warring, as you did at Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Sweden medical cases chart. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly restored your preferred spelling variation at Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Sweden medical cases chart despite objections. You need to start using edit summaries and you need to discuss your proposed changes at Template talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Sweden medical cases chart, where you can explain why you feel your preferred spelling variation should be used. If you do not heed this warning, it is very likely that your next block will be permanent. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ― Ætoms ^[talk] 14:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Linde Place. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]