User talk:Liveangle

Islam in China

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Islam in China. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Zouavman Le Zouave _{(Talk to me!)} 23:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I took out Lan Yu, Hui Liangyu, Ma Bufang since they are not "major figures" when concerning the religion of Islam in China compared to Yusuf Ma Dexin and Liu Zhi who were major Islamic scholars. Abstrakt (talk)

Hi I just checked out a Chinese source on Chang Yuchun, he was not a "Hui" person as in a Hui Muslim but an "Anhui" person as he was an ethnic Han from Anhui province, please check your Chinese next time.

I took those figures since the template lists "major figures" in the history of Islam in China, and you have not provided any reason why they are important figures in the history of Islam in China besides "I think they are important". For example, Hui Liangyu a Communist official who is supposed to be officially atheist, Ma Bufang a Kuomintang warlord whose career ended in a scandal trying to force his niece to be one of his concubines, and Lan Yu a Ming dynasty general who happened to be Muslim. These individuals, other than the fact they were of Hui background do not really stand out as being notable figures in the history of Islam in China compared to figures like Liu Zhi, an Islamic scholar who wrote on Islam and Confucian philosophy. Abstrakt (talk)

Muslim Rebellion

Please see response at my talk page. Vmenkov 00:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Please see response at my talk page. Vmenkov, 20 June 2007.

Genocide in China in 1800s

Please see Talk:Genocides in history/Archive 4#China in 1800s --Philip Baird Shearer 23:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genocides in history

Please see Talk:Genocides in history#China --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 20:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Genocides in history#China --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 23:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Because the above discussions have been archived, the two links given above are now incorrect. They should be:

Talk:Genocides in history/Archive 5#China and Talk:Genocides_in_history/Archive_6#China. Without knowing about these discussions, I have criticized the China section of the page on Genocides in history, to which I think you contributed. Please see Talk:Genocides in history#The China section. Cheers, Madalibi (talk) 15:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Religion in China

Please stop edit warring. It is disruptive. Please use the talk page and discuss disputed changes. Continued disruption could result in page protection or blocking of your account. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the accusations about me tracking you on Wikipedia, really I'm quite flattered my friend, however I have not edited "your" template for a while now, I do apologize if you have gotten an impression that you are followed. And yes believe me, I did believe that my arguement was justified at time and I was not making an attempt to engage in a so called "edit war", obviously I have not edited your template simply out of lack of interest as to avoid a fruitless edit war. Out of curiosity if I may ask, are you a native Chinese Muslim yourself? If so are you a native Mandarin speaker? Well happy editing =) Abstrakt (talk) 01:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please refrain from edit warring on the Religion in China. It is very disruptive to the article. Instead please use the talk page and discuss disputed changes. Continued disruption could result in page protection or blocking of your account. Abstrakt (talk) 01:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I simply edited the way I did to maintain the consistency of the section ie look at the subsections for "ancestor worship", "Buddhism" and "Taoism". The links themselves are hyperlinked so if a reader were to click on the particular link, he/she would be directed to the appropiate article, furthermore the main focus of the section is varied religions practiced in China so it is appopriate to have the section linked up the way I had it linked up. Out of curiosity if I may ask since you did not respond to the last time I ask you, are you a native Chinese Muslim yourself? If so are you a native Mandarin speaker? Abstrakt (talk)

Hi Editingman, what is the point of adding this template to the Religion in China article? I mean if we were to add that template, then why not the templates of the other religions of China? Honestly what is your point of engaging in an edit war pushing for your template? I mean seriously what is your agenda? Why do you feel such a need to promote Islam in China? I've asked you several times out of curiosity what is your background with Chinese Islam (ie. Are you an ethnic Hui Muslim?) and each time you've choosen to ignore the question. I ask out of sincerety and curiosity, I mean the most respect when I ask why you are so obsessed with Chinese Islam, I'm just trying to make sense of it all. Again I do not see the point of adding this template to a religion article which is merely a summary article of the various religions in China.Abstrakt (talk) 23:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Indian famine page

I didn't realize you had made a page on the Indian famine of 1899-1902. There was no "Indian famine of 1899-1902," only an "Indian famine of 1899-1900." To be sure, there were localized famines in parts of the Bombay Presidency in 1901 and 1902, but no famine all over India. No scholar calls it the "Indian famine of 1899-1902." I have removed that link from the Timeline page of Indian famines. Also, Davis's book, a polemical account by a maverick academic, has wildly exaggerated mortality figures. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

The recent edit you made to People's Republic of China constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Angelo De La Paz (talk) 03:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Thank You Mr Editingman, for awarding me The Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Although I have managed to collect a lot of facts about various Muslims in Burma, my English is not very good. Kindly help my articles to improve them up to the Wiki Standard. --Darz kkg (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Religion in China

Sorry for replying late. I didn't notice that you left a message on my talk page. My usual habit is to scroll all the way to the bottom of my talk page whenever I see the yellow banner. It would be easier if you start a new section on a talk page instead of continue posting in the discussion section that was untouched by two months. I am not quite sure what you actually requested for. Can you rephrase your request again? --Joshua ^{Say "hi" to me!}_{What I've done?} 07:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request to just read my Panthay (Burmese Chinese Muslim) article

Dear brother, I have noticed that you have great interest and had done a lot to improve the Islam in China articles(Wiki forced us to use like this awkward term but as the person who accepted Islam is called a Muslim, this Wiki term is indirectly acknowledging and accepting the usage of their much 'hated' Chinese Muslim, Burmese Muslim, Indian Muslim e.t.c. terms). I wish to request your kind help to polish my beloved, Panthay (Burmese Chinese Muslim) article.

TQ for every thing. --Darz kkg (talk) 04:21, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Liveangle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Liveangle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Liveangle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]