User talk:Lookuman
Ppu lease do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Kevin 21:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Telugu Brahmins
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Telugu Brahmins, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kevin 21:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Kapu caste
[edit]Addition of famous kapus' is a carryover from an AfD, and is laden with POV, hence i deleted it.I've added the NPOV tag, as this article appears to be nothing more than a fluff piece on a specific caste, with very little verifiable research.If this article isn't fixed, I may suggest it as an Article for Deletion.
What is the basis for considering an articles nuetrality is disputed??? Anything that is published on the iy have n internet is not the only piece of Authentic information!!! Indian History is quite old and not everything can be published on the internet!!!And regarding the Famous Kapu being added i have no control on who adds content and who does not that does not form a basis for saying the article is not formatted and stuctured properly... Please check the article now... and remove the Neutrality is Disputed comment!!!
And whats this comments you have posted saying fluff piece the content is as much authentic as it can get the references have been posted below!!! isnt that suffieicint for you???