User talk:Lostinniagarafalls

Welcome!

Hello, Film contributor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Rosiestep (talk) 23:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lola Zunnunova (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lola Zunnunova instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lola Zunnunova and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lola Zunnunova, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Film contributor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thorough instructions. I was unable to transfer the draft version to article section so I created it again in article section. I request you to delete the draft version and I further will work on the article and add sources that work for the notability proof.

Thank you so much Film contributor Film contributor (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lola Zunnunova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lola Zunnunova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Zunnunova until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Utkirbek Kakhorov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Utkirbek Kakhorov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utkirbek Kakhorov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 22:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to make individual, direct inquiry of past editors. The AfD is open for any and all to weigh in on a central forum. Star Mississippi 00:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Lostinniagarafalls, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Uzbekistan

Hello, Lostinniagarafalls,

Although it is not very active, you might check in to this WikiProject so you can connect with other editors interested in writing about the subjects that interest you as well. You might find the support you are looking for. Good luck! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Utkirbek Kakhorov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Utkirbek Kakhorov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utkirbek Kakhorov. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Star Mississippi 15:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Esat Karlıdağ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Esat Karlıdağ, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello Lostinniagarafalls. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lostinniagarafalls. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lostinniagarafalls|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am impressed seeing this. I have just written to @StarMisissipi "What is COI? Is that Certificated of Insurance?" I even didn't know what is COI. I declare that I am not paid for anything that I have been contributing to Wiki projects. I do this volontarily. I do edits into many topics related very broad range of spheres. Lostinniagarafalls (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lostinniagarafalls Perhaps you can enlighten myself and Star Mississippi as to how these images [1] [2] [3] [4] of subjects you've written (promotionally, at that) about just happen to be your own work but you lack any connection? PRAXIDICAE💕 19:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can I send you a video message that I am the one who personally know all you mentioned? Lostinniagarafalls (talk) 05:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you've already been made aware of our COI and paid editing policy, you know what you need to do and I suggest you do so before editing again. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Laziz Rustamov. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 18:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Can Storm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Can Storm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can Storm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~Styyx^Talk? 20:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ferhat Domurcuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferhat Domurcuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferhat Domurcuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~Styyx^Talk? 20:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gürkan Keçici for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gürkan Keçici is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gürkan Keçici until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~Styyx^Talk? 20:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Esat Karlıdağ

A tag has been placed on Draft:Esat Karlıdağ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G11, The creator is a probably paid editor.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kadı Message 20:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lola Zunnunova

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lola Zunnunova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G11, The creator is a probably paid editor.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kadı Message 20:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lostinniagarafalls,

There is a main space version of this article at Lola Zunnunova so I have changed your draft into a redirect. If you think any of the content in your draft would be useful in the main space article, feel free to make use of it. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lola Zunnunova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lola Zunnunova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Zunnunova (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kadı Message 20:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How on the earth you can judge this article? You 'played' all my articles about Turkish and now you have checked all my created articles and nominated for deletion? As you are not Uzbek, you cannot say that she is not notable to be on Wikipedia? I request you to invite other administrators who are Uzbek and can judge the notability? Other view this is bout because of your bias phobia Lostinniagarafalls (talk) 06:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ikhtiyor Rakhman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ikhtiyor Rakhman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikhtiyor Rakhman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kadı Message 22:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Belated life

The article Belated life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ferhat Domurcuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferhat Domurcuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferhat Domurcuk (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

─ The Aafī (talk) 13:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Esat Karlıdağ (September 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chris troutman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Every single one of the citations is not independent: they are each fluff pieces from interviews of the subject with flattering pictures of the subject because each are published at the behest of the subject. This is a guy buying his own media coverage. Wikipedia does not tolerate these fluff bios. You give the impression of being an undeclared paid editor. Please tell your client Wikipedia is not friendly to this.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Utkirbek Qahhorov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Utkirbek Qahhorov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utkirbek Qahhorov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Utkirbek Qahhorov while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understood

thank you so much Lostinniagarafalls (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

conflict of interest

It seems that you have a particular interest in a set of articles and I worry that you have taken pay for this work without telling us. You are legally obligated to disclose if you are being paid to edit. Wikipedia also has rules regarding conflicts of interest, whether you've been paid or not. If you keep causing us, the volunteer editing community, a bunch of problems we might just block you and your other accounts from editing, including IPs. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Inbazar

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Inbazar, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thank you Lostinniagarafalls (talk) 19:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lostinniagarafalls. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 19:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aldatmak

The article Aldatmak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not encyclopedic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Belated life for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belated life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belated life until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Esat Karlıdağ

Hello, Lostinniagarafalls. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Esat Karlıdağ, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Nazlı Ekşi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Nazlı Ekşi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Oaktree b (talk) 03:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

As should be clear from the notices above, you have been creating too many inappropriate articles, and have also dodged questions regarding whether you are being paid to edit that those inappropriate articles have raised from several editors. This is the final chance you will receive to rectify this before you are blocked from editing entirely. Firstly, your next edit is required to be a clear answer to the following question: Are you being paid or compensated to edit Wikipedia? If your next edit is anything except a direct and clear answer to that, I will block you. Secondly, you will need to address why you have been creating so many articles that end up deleted. Editors are expected to understand policies on notability, neutrality, and the like, prior to creating any articles. If you do not understand these policies (which clearly, if you titled an article starting with "Dr." inappropriately, you don't), then you will need to refrain from further mainspace creations until you do. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Veda Mektubu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Veda Mektubu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Veda Mektubu

Hello, Lostinniagarafalls. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Veda Mektubu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Veda Mektubu

Hello, Lostinniagarafalls. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Veda Mektubu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 10:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ben Bu Cihana Sığmazam

The article Ben Bu Cihana Sığmazam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]