User talk:LuGiADude

The Editor's Barnstar

February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Ministry of Magic, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

License tagging for Image:PokemonMysteryBlue.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PokemonMysteryBlue.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Obesity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 16:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karazus Centuri

The article Karazus Centuri has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 15:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to The Sound of Drums

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Sound of Drums. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will ^{(I hope they cannot see, I AM THE GREAT DESTROYER!)} 14:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Golbez 10:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice. Don't do it again. --Golbez 12:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Pokemon Pearl Start Menu.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Pokemon Pearl Start Menu.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Humandalek.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Humandalek.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Echidna

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ran (talk) 15:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wellington Crescent

An article that you have been involved in editing, Wellington Crescent, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellington Crescent. Thank you. --Tailkinker 10:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria

Neither image passes #10. Will ^(talk) 13:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sound of Drums

Read what was claimed

The claim was that barney said that the Sound of Drums was the second episode.

All he actually said was that Utopia was the first of a 3 part story

Obviously the Sound of Drums is the second part of a 3 parter but Barney never said it was which was the claim .Garda40 19:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thesearemyfriends.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thesearemyfriends.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Toclafane.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Toclafane.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on talk pages

Can you please refrain from leaving offensive comments about other nations on Wikipedia talk pages? There is no need for it. -- Roleplayer 20:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yu-Gi-Oh! pages

I see you are uninformed about the naming conventions of Yu-Gi-Oh!

The English-language manga, Lugiadude, uses many of the Japanese names. The manga is the original form of YGO, so we chose to use its conventions. Yes, the manga uses Jonouchi, Honda, Anzu, etc. There are some exceptions to that rule in the manga (for instance, Pegasus's English anime name is used in the English manga).

You can find it in many bookstores in North America. WhisperToMe 14:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. The manga was the original form of YGO. Kazuki Takahashi started Yu-Gi-Oh! in Japan's Weekly Shonen Jump in 1996. The first TV anime began and ended in 1998. That one is Japan-only. The second began in 2000, and that one was translated.

2. Using the 2nd series names would ignore and conflict with the manga storyline, since the official English version diverges on some points. Why use "Joey" when describing the manga-exclusive events prior to Duelist Kingdom.

We DO use "English anime" names when discussing characters and plots exclusive to the 2nd anime series (Rebecca Hopkins, Noah Kaiba, etc.) As for YGO GX, all versions translated into English, anime and manga (the anime came first in Japan), use the 4Kids English names. WhisperToMe 02:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"But why isn't Mario called Jumpman in the article? " - In all countries he is known as Mario. "Jumpman" was used in Donkey Kong only. WhisperToMe 06:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war at Doctor (Doctor Who)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Doctor (Doctor Who). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I've begun a discussion about "∂³∑x²" at Talk:Doctor (Doctor Who)#∂³∑x². Please join in! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Doctor Who (series 4), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mudkipz.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mudkipz.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mudkipz.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mudkipz.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon

Since you like pokemon i suggest you check out Bulbapedia. A pokemon wiki, I'm David aipom there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.10.221 (talk) 18:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spaceinvadersextremepsp.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Spaceinvadersextremepsp.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Faulty swear filter.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Faulty swear filter.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to David Cameron, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Toon 20:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to David Cameron, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ElationAviation (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]