User talk:M.C. ArZeCh

Chaos Magic term first used?

I see you have mentioned thi sin the talk page of the Peter Carroll article but the whole talk page is a mess. Please see my question about this this Chaos Magic term and when it was first used here. I hope you will contribute. FK0071a 23:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I wash my hands of my entire involvement in that article (indeed, most articles before maybe two years ago). Sorry I can't help.--M.C. ArZeCh (talk) 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of NLP Modeling

An editor has nominated NLP Modeling, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NLP Modeling and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

Yeah, that's about par for articles I contributed to back then. Blech. An embarrassment. --M.C. ArZeCh (talk) 12:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quantum Psychology

The article Quantum Psychology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Book on a fringe topic with no sources, failing WP:FRINGE and WP:NBOOK. Seems like a case of quantum mysticism and physics envy, with no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blythwood (talk) 02:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Quantum Psychology

Hello, M.C. ArZeCh

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Quantum Psychology, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum Psychology.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quantum Psychology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quantum Psychology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum Psychology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]