User talk:Magnoffiq

Magnoffiq, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Magnoffiq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tebufenozide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glyphosate

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all pages relating to genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This is a formality, because you made a revert there and need to know about the 1RR rule. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canada Agricultural Products Act

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canada Agricultural Products Act requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KnowledgeChuck (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oddly, some user called GiantSnowman deleted the record of the Speedy Deletion notice, after the SD had been discontinued by a fourth party (named Natureium) a scant 11 minutes after the original SD notice. Why GiantSnowman should feel it right to vandalise my talk page is curious. I have now restored the record. Magnoffiq (talk) 23:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman didn't vandalize your talk page, they removed a message that was added by a blocked account. This is standard practice per WP:BANREVERT and there's no issue with you restoring the message if you choose to do so.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!! Thanks Ponyo :) I didn't know that KnowledgeChuck had been banned. Why would he have chosen to pick on me? At random, or does he have an agenda? Where might I discover this information? Magnoffiq (talk) 23:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the background here. Giant Snowman 07:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, GiantSnowman. :) Along the way, I discovered Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Josh.172. It seems KnowledgeChuck et al is a little unbalanced. Now that I have understood this event a little better, I retract the verb I employed near you. Magnoffiq (talk) 10:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Worst case analysis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Washington State

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pest Management Regulatory Agency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page POEA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Magnoffiq, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Canadian Beef Grading Agency have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Agri-Food Research Council moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Canadian Agri-Food Research Council, is unsuitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its present form. It needs a succinct account of the organisation, its activities and why it was notable, not lists of factsheets, publications, bullet points etc. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olga of Kiev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your addition to Accokeek Creek has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Canadian Agri-Food Research Council

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Canadian Agri-Food Research Council requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20070806192405/http://www.carc-crac.ca/english/codes_of_practice/vealcde.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested this dimwit, on Draft:Canadian Agri-Food Research Council, especially see Draft Talk page. Magnoffiq (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Principio Furnace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antibiotic prophylaxis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Magnoffiq. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

One Ton Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RORC

One Ton class (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RORC

Terry McLaughlin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCYC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:13, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing in Wikipedia is a privilege freely offered to all, but everyone is obligated to learn and follow the policies and guidelines. That is your obligation. Please do take some time to read the message above and the links in it. If you continue to refuse to try to learn, your editing privileges can be removed or restricted. Please be patient and give yourself time. Jytdog (talk) 22:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Cyclophosphamide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 22:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not engaged in an edit war. I simply reverted the previous editor's change. Don't get your panties in a knot, please. Magnoffiq (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are; if you continue it becomes blockable. You are fairly new here and I suggest that you be less combative. Please be patient and try to learn how this place works, instead of arguing. btw you might find User:Jytdog/How useful, to get better oriented to what we do here, how we do it, and why we do things as we do. Jytdog (talk) 23:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No I most definitely am not. You are projecting your own psyche onto something that really isn't there. Magnoffiq (talk) 23:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve E494

Thanks for creating E494.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 03:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul James Phelan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul James Phelan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Þjarkur (talk) 22:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recipe Unlimited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paul James Phelan

Hello Ken. Thanks for your work on such pages as C&C Yachts. I'm disappointed to remark that my submission of a page on Paul James Phelan has been contested and is now a candidate for speedy deletion. As a Canadian and a sailor, I wonder if you might help to preserve the Paul James Phelan page. Thanks for your consideration. Magnoffiq (talk)

I think you could use some more references, relating to sailing directly? Try a Google search with both "Paul Phelan" "Red Jacket" OR "Paul Phelan" "sailing". I just tried and got the following (the first might be the best):

Ken Heaton (talk) 11:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constitutional Act 1791, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeholder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Frobisher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champlain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Health and Welfare Act 1984 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Animal Health and Welfare Act 1984, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 09:55, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animal Health and Welfare Act 1984 has been accepted

Animal Health and Welfare Act 1984, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SweetCanadianMullet (talk) 03:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Diseases of Animals Act moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Diseases of Animals Act, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 10:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Animal Health Act 1981 you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Government Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NewScientist

Is not a government source. It is a popular press source. The BMJ source is primary press. Please use a review article. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Your recent editing history at Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You've already well exceeded WP:3RR so I'd suggest you take it to the talk page as several different editors have told you. Praxidicae (talk) 16:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense, as indicated on your talk page. Magnoffiq (talk) 17:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Stephen John Barclay) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Stephen John Barclay.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Stephen John Barclay. I recommend adding more material (if available) on his business endeavors beyond his association with the America's Cup.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diseases of Animals Act has been accepted

Diseases of Animals Act, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 14:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flight cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Flight cycle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:12, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transport Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facial recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canadian Meat Science Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canadian Meat Science Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://cmsa-ascv.ca/home.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 17:19, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sphilbrick: I don't think my article stub violated any copyright. Unfortunately, I could not contest this decision owing to the rapidity of its deletion. My text was (and is) heavily paraphrased so I feel confident that re-submission is in order and would ask you to pay more attention to nuance. Your automated copyright violation finder tool likely needs some adjustment. Magnoffiq (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From the source:

The Canadian Meat Science Association, Canada's national meat science association, was created in 1985 and now includes representatives from all sectors of the Canadian meat industry, from academia and from government.

From your draft:

The Canadian Meat Science Association is Canada's national meat science association. It was created in 1985 and as of 2019 includes representatives from all sectors of the Canadian meat industry, notably from government and from academia.

In my opinion, this is Close paraphrasing, not heavily paraphrased. S Philbrick (Talk) 23:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flight cycle (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more sources to show this is a notable term on its own rather than belonging to a dictionary/glossary

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flight cycle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flight cycle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ractopamine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Athletic and MRL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Meat Science Association

The article Canadian Meat Science Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP - lacks coverage in Reliable Sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 20:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cylindrobasidium laeve moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cylindrobasidium laeve, has no citations as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

And you should probably write the article about the organism, not the product DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chondrostereum purpureum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Acer

Feed additive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Prescription

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liquid manure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Trimetazidine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Athletics

Wills, Estates And Succession Act of British Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CBC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Parker (teenager)

The article Matthew Parker (teenager) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't believe being the 17th UK victim of a particular disease meets the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability (people). This information is more appropriate for inclusion in the article for the disease itself, Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — TAnthony^Talk 22:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarah Roberts (accountant)

The article Sarah Roberts (accountant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't believe being a victim of a particular disease meets the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability (people). This information is more appropriate for inclusion in the article for the disease itself, Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — TAnthony^Talk 22:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Parker (teenager) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Parker (teenager) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Parker (teenager) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — TAnthony^Talk 23:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grant Goodwin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grant Goodwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Goodwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sarah Roberts (accountant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Roberts (accountant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Roberts (accountant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — TAnthony^Talk 14:41, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Your addition to Canada's Food Guide has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:26, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Diannaa: I knew you'd be around sooner or later. If you care to look at the source of the supposed copyright violation, you will see that it is Canadian government text. As such, it is licensed under the Template:OGL-C. I would be more than happy to fix your faulty software, so that instead of this embarrassing trouble, it would automatically sense the federal website and insert the appropriate text in the references section, like Template:Sect1911 does. I am surprised you haven't already encountered this problem and been able to fix it on your own. -- Magnoffiq (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Magnoffiq. I did look for a license, and found a link to the "Terms and conditions" page, which states that commercial use is not permitted. Wikipedia does allow commercial use, so the webpage is not compatibly licensed. I can see no evidence that the content is released under an OGL license. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk)

Hello @Diannaa:. Thank you for the reply. I'm dismayed that the canada.ca site has a more restrictive copyright policy than the open.canada.ca licence. This is not well detailed on the Template:OGL-C wikimedia site, nor for that matter the canada.ca site. I was under the impression that the OGL-C policy was similar to the OGL-UK policy. More's the pity. -- Magnoffiq (talk) 15:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Claire McVey

Hi there - please don't restore that content without a reliable source indicating the notability of the subject. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FIFY. You do your reputation a disservice when you cloak your vandalism in nannyish tones. Instead of removing the page and replacing it with a redirect, you might have googled "claire mcvey youngest" yourself and hey presto solved the problem with much less bother and static. -- Magnoffiq (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or not, given that it's now been nommed for deletion due to notability concerns. Suggest also adding WP:NOTVAND and WP:CIVIL to your reading list. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claire McVey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claire McVey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire McVey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — TAnthony^Talk 18:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mefloquine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicholas Robinson (civil servant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicholas Robinson (civil servant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Robinson (civil servant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Reid (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act

Hello, Magnoffiq,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thioflavin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irritant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DocJames: thanks for the reminder, but I think you meant it for somebody else. Magnoffiq (talk) 23:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No this is for you

These are primary sources and fairly old at that

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=8789977

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=9196769

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Global Cooling moved to draftspace

Don't put articles into the mainspace until they have enough sources to meet notability guidelines. Once the article's ready, feel free to move it back, no need to bother with the AfC submissions process. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Irritation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to OSHA

Quinism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chronic

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"open access journals" and wikipedia

Hello copyright maven @Diannaa:! I wonder if I can copy into wikimedia a figure which is published in an Open Access format, specifically from an article in Sustainability, so that I can explain a concept here on wikipedia. Magnoffiq (talk) 22:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Mietchen: any help you can furnish would be appreciated. Magnoffiq (talk) 22:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! What you need to do is find out whether or not the particular article or image is released under a compatible license (not all open access articles are compatibly licensed! it just means you don't have to pay $$ to look at them). I have downloaded the article, and I see on the last page that the article is released under a compatible license (Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)). (Here is the list of compatible licenses.) If it's one of the images you're looking to use, please upload it to the Commons, and use the same license, and do it like this: {{cc-by-3.0}} or choose "Attribution 3.0" from the drop-down menu. If you copy some prose from the article, you need to provide attribution. You can use {{CC-notice}} or you can do it manually, like I did here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your valuable advice, @Diannaa:. Magnoffiq (talk) 16:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cylindrobasidium laeve has been accepted

Cylindrobasidium laeve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 09:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Darylgolden: Magnoffiq (talk) 11:57, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pembina Pipeline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kakwa and Cutbank

Chronic wasting disease (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Retropharyngeal

Inter Pipeline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chevron

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from BRIC into Eurasianism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Diannaa: thanks for your comment. Magnoffiq (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to do it via template rather than hand written note, but I am super busy, and the template covers all the points pretty thoroughly :) — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United States v. Stumbo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States v. Stumbo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States v. Stumbo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SportingFlyer T·C 02:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to CBC, New York and Privy Council Office

Canadian Federation of Independent Business (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amazon

Pembina Pipeline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kakwa

Universal Postal Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amazon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Privy Council Office (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 02:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Flight cycle concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Flight cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Flight cycle

Hello, Magnoffiq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flight cycle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Global Cooling

Hello, Magnoffiq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Global Cooling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Racemate has been nominated for renaming

Category:Racemate has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]