User talk:Mahant Sonty

Welcome!

Hi Mahant Sonty! I noticed your contributions to Ravidassia and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tristario (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you---- Mahant Sonty (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

genuine ravidass gurdwaras pictures , government notifications,indian census report, newspaper references has been provided for Ravidassia page....... Dev Mahey (talk) 07:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sources on sikhwiki is from books , newspapers and ravidass gurdwaras photos are genuine ......

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=8TvnDwAAQBAJ&dq=ramdasia+caste+in+jammu&pg=PA64&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=ramdasia%20caste%20in%20jammu&f=false

newspaper about similarities of ramdasia and ravidasias

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/punjabs-dalit-conundrum-a-look-into-sikhs-caste-identity/articleshow/86607310.cms

department of social justice , government of india 's website clearly reflecting that chamar, ravidasia andramdasia are same

https://socialjustice.gov.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/Scan-0015.jpg Dev Mahey (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: sikhwiki is not a reliable source - if the sources on it support what you want to include, you should directly use those sources. Sikhwiki is not a reliable source for the same reason that wikipedia is not a reliable source. Typically you should also rely on secondary sources, that indian government website is a primary source.

I don't know anything about this topic but it seemed like a number of Mahant Sonty's changes were reasonable, and you just reverted all of them. This is all best discussed on the talk page of the article too - Talk:Ravidassia Tristario (talk) 08:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Government hasn't accepted ravidassia as religion but its accepted as a caste....

not even single ravidass gurdwara in USA and England following Amritbani.....but they are following shri guru granth sahib.....

list of gurdwara is genuine ,if you want then i can link all gurdwaras with google map location( that will be live proof)

list of politicians are from those who contested on reserve seats and moreover their pages are live on Wikipedia with their caste references..

civil servants all got appointed through scheduled caste reservation......, for many i attached newspaper references alongside sikhwiki references...

Conclusion Ravidasia is not legitimate religion but its legally accepted as caste by Government of India..... Dev Mahey (talk) 08:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mahant Sonty. I see you know your way around. ;) El_C 19:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't distort the page as its all with references. If you really want to improve it the please add something new about ramdasia army recruitment with genuine references and about hindu ramdasias who migrated from pakistan and currently livingg in kashmir , pathankot, gurdaspur and few families in jalandhar( Sialkotias)

Regards Dev Mahey (talk) 04:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bachur Khokhani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bachur Khokhani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=nl&id=06cwDwAAQBAJ&dq=Bachur+Khokani&q=holford#v=snippet&q=holford&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that Bachur Khokani should be known as hero. Mahant Sonty (talk) 08:15, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahant Sonty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry, i really don't know why you blocked me, i do not use multiple accounts on Wikipedia, i want more better Wikipedia ----

Decline reason:

We think you did. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mahant Sonty (talk) 03:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What i need to be unblocked. Mahant Sonty (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahant Sonty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what i need to be unlocked, i created pages with reliable sources but why you blocked me from editing. Mahant Sonty (talk) 08:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mahant Sonty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok i will not make any edit who damage Wikipedia. Before creating anything i will consult with Wikipedia administrators or experienced users in talk pages and will make usefull edits. Believe me l, i have no evil mind.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think, this place is not for me bcoz here are control of dictatorship.

You Administrators saying to do good things on Wikipedia but i don't know what i did which damaged the Wikipedia. Mahant Sonty (talk) 14:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]