User talk:RothkoChapel

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:Manchester Collective, and I noticed that your username, "Manchesterclassical", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 11:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I understand your concern. I choose the name Manchesterclassical because I am live in Manchester and have an interest in classical music. I do not represent any sort of organization and am an individual. I also have no personal or professional relationship to any of the articles I have written. If it would still be best to change my user name I'd be happy to do so but I figured I would explain that I am not violating any policies in terms of representing an organization or biased source. Manchesterclassical (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I had saw this before you changed your username, I'd been okay with it. But ya know, your new name is okay, too.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided to change my name anyway to remove any confusion about being an organization. RothkoChapel (talk) 14:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manchester Collective (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manchester Collective and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Baqi:) (talk) 14:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RothkoChapel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Baqi:) (talk) 14:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manchester Collective has been accepted

Manchester Collective, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]