User talk:Mandragua

Welcome!

Hello, Mandragua, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Zad68 17:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

You are free to add reliably sourced information. You may not, however, remove information in favour of your opinion. 69.181.253.230 (talk) 23:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Frontal lobe disorder with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frontal lobe disorder with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 69.181.253.230 (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mandragua. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 00:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mandragua. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 00:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ok, Im not going to edit anything else. why do you change names all the time?

Discussion of your edits

ok, I dont understand can you be more specific?

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This warning for your recent edits at certain drug articles adding off-topic or insufficiently sourced content, and also for you removal of the discussion of your edits at WT:MED. Zad68 17:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you mind explaining me that please? According to my rights I am allowed to edit articles. You are not explaining yourself about what part of my edits you disagree with. My rights are being violated. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandragua (talk • contribs)

Nobody has a 'right' to edit here - it is a privilege. I'm not sure what the specific concerns of other editors are, but if you discuss it with them in a calm and civil manner then I am sure they will explain. SmartSE (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) Hi Mandragua, it sounds like you misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. First, nobody has a 'right' to edit Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a private enterprise with lots of rules about what you can or cannot do, and if you do not follow the rules, your ability to edit will be revoked. You have no legal recourse if your ability to edit is revoked.

I will leave you a welcome message at the top of this page, please read through Wikipedia's rules so that you understand what kind of behavior is expected here. Thanks... Zad68 17:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you called me disruptive, then you are the one who has to tell me what rules I have broken. I have read those rules carefully and don't see anything disruptive, but I am open to dialogue if you explain it. Thhanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandragua (talk • contribs)

Sure, pick 2 or 3 of the reverts you do not understand the most, list them here, and I will explain. Zad68 17:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok cst question, who are you? and why are you deleting my edits? I am giving you a warning, next edit you delete, your account will be closed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandragua (talk • contribs)

I am a Wikipedia editor just like you are. Your getting my account closed based on this exchange is unlikely but feel free to lodge a complaint at the appropriate noticeboard if you feel it necessary. If you would still like me to explain any reverts, go ahead and list them here, I am still willing to explain. Zad68 18:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop discussing this, haven't you read the rules?? this is a private company, you have to be nice to me and kiss my ass or your account will be closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandragua (talk • contribs)

You have been made aware of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it's now up to you to decide if you want to read and follow them. But, as you wish, I'll exit this conversation now. Zad68 18:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

same to YOU

Frontal lobe disorder

I have explained all my changes, while you have simply undone my changes. Moreover, an important bit of the article was simply moved to talk page for further discussion and improvement. If you feel the changes are not adequate feel free to seek consensus at talk page. --Garrondo (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you basically deleted all the causes of frontal lobe disorder, explain. and what bit do you want to discuss? . in the meantime leave it as it is. thanks

Complaint on Administrator's Noticeboard

Please take note of WP:ANI#User edit-warring at several articles concerning antipsychotic drugs. Looie496 (talk) 15:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 15:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dermies, can you please unblock me? You do have a valid reason for this. So much work for nothing... "I'll be back!"

You already were back, which is why I blocked Momentarilylost (talk · contribs) as well. Drmies (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The momentarilylost was there long before being blocked, you're obviously not keeping up with me!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mandragua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

right, can you please put back my paper on electroconvulsive therapy? they did new tests before and after ECT, its from 2012 and it says it interefers with connectivities in the frontal lobe and thats why depressive symptoms go away! what you have there is obsolete, they now have ways of testing the brain so its got nothing to do with animal tests! what kind of encyclopedia is this? Rubish. Thanks

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Kinu ^t/_c 18:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mandragua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think you have blocked me because I am too good at editting and keeping up with information and those psychiatrist students you got there are lazy, ridiculous

Decline reason:

not a valid reason to unblock. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

sorry there was something wrong with the text

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mandragua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My reason is because I have the right to be unblocked. This is an unblocking request, please unblock me because I am much better at editting than that Dermies idiot and I want to add new information regarding ECT tests on connectivities. Besides I am suffering effects of wikipedia withdrawal and going psychotic. Thanks fatty

Decline reason:

Not a valid reason to unblock, and attacking other editors does not help you.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked talk page access (and not just because I'm fat). Drmies (talk) 18:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]