Jump to content

User talk:Manyevent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Manyevent! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --EoL talk 23:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hello!

[edit]

I noticed in your brief introduction that you would like to one day be an Administrator. As such, I've added a user box to your user page that specifies that. By doing so, it automatically places your user page in a category of users who hope to be an Admin someday. It can help you get noticed by the existing Admins and Bureaucrats, which might help you in your quest! If there's anything that I might be able to assist you with, please do not hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page! Thanks! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 23:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Memphis Bleek

[edit]

My advice to you is very simple: If you think the other user is going to upset you, then ignore them. Edit the article as you see in the best interests of Wikipedia, but don't get into an edit war or any other actions that might hurt your quest for Admin status later on down the road! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 00:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't see where the other editor has made any edits that are not accurate. In fact, I would have tagged many more aspects of the article as needing citations because that is a rather sizeable article to only have a single reference listed. If you feel that your form of the article is "better," then I would suggest that your first project as a registered WP user be to go through that article and reference as much of it as possible. Doing so, in fact, may potentially bump the article up to "Good Article" status, which could be great achievement for you as a new editor. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 00:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that the article is, on the whole, pretty accurate. But, think of it this way... if you were writing a research paper for a class about Memphis Bleek and cited Wikipedia, how do you think your professor would view your information if he / she were to come here, review that article, and only see ONE listed reference for an article that is probably three printed pages long? --InDeBiz1 (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...

[edit]

Its tough and I've tried, but some of these users are too up-tight, you'll see, but I have turned one enemy into a friend User:Esanchez7587 WHAT UP MY LATIN HOMIE!!!!!!. My temper has gone down some, but I'll probably never be an administrator or lead Wikipedian. You know you remind me a lot of me when I first started. Just don't get mad like I did and you will be the future. Ps, please for my buddy Esanchez's sake please add references, if you don't, he will burn you!

Remember to cite reliable published sources

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Memphis Bleek, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! (jarbarf) (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]