User talk:Marcmaison

Picasso and gemmail

Hello Marc- Neither of the references you and AzitaS cite in Stained_glass#Twentieth_century supports the assertion that Picasso created works in gemmail, nor have I found any other sources to support the assertion. Can you provide a good reference? Eric ^talk 15:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem, as I have already pointed out to AzitaS is that the sentence had been put in between another statement and its reference. Please do not split references off from the info that they pertain to.

The newly added reference from Time, 1957 which says that the works of many artist had been reproduce, and gives a list of names, some of whom were dead, also indicates that Braque and Picasso were enthusiastic.

However, I am unable to find any particular work that Picasso designed specifically to be created in gemmail. I can find plenty of reference to works by Picasso being reproduced in gemmail. Unlike Matisse whose original stained glass designs are readily apparent. Whereabout are they? Amandajm (talk) 05:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MayaGemmail.jpg

Maya Picasso in front of a Gemmail glass from Pablo Picasso

Hello Eric Please could you take a look, i have many references about the Gemmail

Poster of the exibition of the Gemmaux in 1964

[1]

Article of the Time : A new Art

[2]

Signature of Picasso "a new Art is born : Gemmaux"

[3]

Encyclopedia Britannica

[4]

Marcmaison ^talk 19:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marc- I have seen most of those references, and some of us have worked to improve how you and your "colleagues" cited them in the Gemmail article, as well as added to them. You can see that in the edit history of the article.

The image of the exhibition poster is nice, but needs a source to verify it.
The one of Picasso's signature has been nominated for deletion on WP Commons for various reasons.
As Amanda states above, the Time article does not demonstrate that Picasso created works in gemmail.
And the picture of his wife, which you uploaded as your own work, does not give any source references.

All this going back and forth (and maybe using multiple usernames?) makes collaboration on this small article very tedious. Eric ^talk 19:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Gemmail. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 16:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another note regarding editing habits: It will also be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. Thanks in advance for considering this.

Help:Show_preview promotes minimizing the number of saves per edit session. Eric ^talk 17:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 20:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.