User talk:MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma

March 2021

Hi, this is User:CodeTalker. I wanted to let you know that I reverted your addition to List of PAW Patrol episodes because it appears that you copied a lot of the text from fandom.com. This is a copyright violation, and is considered a very serious violation of Wikipedia rules. There can be legal repercussions for copyright violations. If you wish to add this material, you must rewrite it in your own words. Please see the copyright guidelines for more information on how to add this material in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 00:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Duchess of Calabria. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

The same goes for Prince Carlo, Duke of Castro. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Hello there! I've noticed that you have moved Princess Cécile of Bourbon-Parma to Princess Cécile Marie of Bourbon-Parma. While "Marie" is her middle name, none of the sources show that the use of "Marie" is in her WP:COMMON NAME. Please consider starting a move discussion on an article's talk page before going ahead and moving an article in the future. Thanks! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

carolina of parma 1770-1804

Hi Caroline had seven children. source Schwennicke: Europäische Stammtafeln I/1, das haus wettin. Furthermore rational thinking would let one see that it is impossible for a child to be born after 5 months after the birth of another child. (child nr 7). Some editors have already tried to edit this but you keep reversing this editing. What is your source? Greetings Aron Aron02065 (talk) 10:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Inés de Borbón-Dos Sicilias a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bad sourcing

Hi, please do not add references to blogs, tabloids, deprecated sources, or bare images, as you did here and here. Thank you. Also, having noticed the other recurring issues editors have brought up on this page, I am pinging @DrKay who is more involved in this area. JoelleJay (talk) 23:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Catherine, Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 08:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Parmesan Royal Family, you may be blocked from editing. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at House of Bourbon-Parma, you may be blocked from editing. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You were told before about cut-and-paste moves above but you've just performed one for Princess Viktória de Bourbon de Parme. You also should never undo a contested move. There is a process for controversial moves, and they shouldn't be performed unilaterally. DrKay (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Queen Anne of Romania. What is your source for Elena being 'Hereditary Princess of Romania? It appears to be an entirely made-up title. DrKay (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the template

Regarding the issue we disagreed over, I posted a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, so you can discuss it there. 2601:249:9301:D570:AD0B:B188:D02D:CB9C (talk) 01:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RFC result, was 'no flags' for non-reigning royals

Howdy. Will you please respect the RFC result, which developed at List of dignitaries at the state funeral of Elizabeth II, which calls for the removal of flags from non-reigning royal houses? GoodDay (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Parmesan Royal Family. Please stop making up ridiculous nonsense at this template. You've been told several times to stop it. I'm pinging administrators @Sdrqaz: @DrKay:, who've warned you before. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Tsuguko of Takamado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kasama. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infanta Maria Antónia of Portugal

I removed the non-notable children per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and I think it is kind of dumb for the entire article to be based on children, marriage, and ancestors. The section title might be a little confusing, I didn't understand until your revert that it was her children. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 19:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the discussion in one place. Looking at some other articles about nobles, "Issue" is an okay name. And also looking at other articles about nobles, such as Caroline of Ansbach, Anne of Denmark, Henry III of England, George VI, cover children in one-sentence blurbs. Current version seems fine, but is very basic. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 14:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince Michel of Bourbon-Parma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Normandie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to PAW Patrol, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Regarding your edit on Elena of Moldavia‎, when you add information to an article, you must provide a reliable source that supports that information, in the form of a properly formatted inline citation. See WP:V and WP:REF. Simply saying "see Russian Wikipedia" in an edit comment is insufficient for two reasons: first it is not in the article itself so that all readers can see and verify it, and second, Wikipedia is not a reliable source; see WP:CIRC. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use circular or user-generated sources. You've been warned about this issue multiple times already. DrKay (talk) 19:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing images

i would like to thank you for cropping images for me and adding links, these things can pass my mind so thank you! You don't have to respond btw Camillz (talk) 13:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Camillz: You're welcome, it was a pleasure. I'm glad you found new images for the members of the imperial family, those of Princesses Akiko & Yōko were older (2012-2013) and are now updated to 2019, thanks to you. I'm also looking for videos with a Commons license to be able to crop the images and insert them on Wikimedia Commons. MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma (talk) 13:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sultanah Nur Diana Petra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sultanah Nur Diana Petra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Istana Negara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Tsuguko of Takamado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tochigi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Azemah Ni'matul Bolkiah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Istana Negara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Margarete of Thurn and Taxis

Hello! I’m the creator of the page of Princess Margarete. Thank your very much for your recent contributions to the page, you’ve helped salvage the page from deletion at which I doubt it will be deleted at this point after the references you’ve put in and you’ve really improved many aspects of it!

Thanks very much and have a great day! Azarctic (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 16:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason for the block is in my opinion quite ridiculous. As you noted, I contributed to the page by bringing SOURCES and all. Of course, I often forgot to include them when I published (you know, it's called forgetting, don't do it on purpose), but then I inserted everything I needed. The block came for this comical reason: I inserted at the end of the page of Princess Margarete of Thurn and Taxis a paragraph explaining why she was one of the longest-lived - acquired - members of the House of Bourbon Parma, citing others as examples (Margrethe of Denmark and Maria Antonia of Braganza) and according to the user who blocked me I had no sources to say so. But -1. Just open the pages of the other Princesses mentioned and check their date of birth and death, and age. This is enough to verify and it's soooo simple to do. -2. It is enough to have noticed her age at the time of death (96 years old), which only she and two other Princesses of Parma by marriage have reached/exceeded. Need more? No

Decline reason:

It's not up to others to find where you're getting the information from, it's up to you. 331dot (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot:No one said that. Simply, I think you will understand if I say that I cannot write the biography of a Princess on another's page, right? Plus, if you read that right: I've always brought the sources. I CANNOT report sources to say that she is one of the longest-lived, because it is not there. But just go and look in the pages of the interested parties and not just block a person, like this. Because for me it is an offense. To make a long story short: I simply reported why she was one of the longest-lived. I can't write the biography and dates of others on the page of the person concerned, because it's not their page, and for that, you use your hand, click the link and verify.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma (talk • contribs) 17:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I CANNOT report sources to say that she is one of the longest-lived, because it is not there." If there are no sources, then it doesn't belong on wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research for guidance. DrKay (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beloved, that is not original research. It is based on facts. There is a method called opening the affected pages and checking, nothing could be simpler. And this belongs to Wikipedia. Maybe false information does not belong to Wikipedia (not my case), but I think that the evidence of the facts belongs to it, and I would say a lot. This is called not wanting to see reality and block a user who only wants the best for that page, and that reports the facts, which apparently some people cannot see even if it would be enough to click links to pages and check. And this is Wikipedia. False information = no Wikipedia, but verifiable information by finger flick = this belongs to Wikipedia. Plus, let's face it, have I ever vandalized pages? Written nonsense? No. I reported an OBVIOUS FACT (and I say it for the last time) wanting only the good for that particular page. You should think about this first, and then click on block (because your vision is different from that of others).They're all good at blocking out and denying reality, but I think everyone is able to use their fingers and write "Margrethe of Denmark" on Wikipedia to see the age at the time of death. MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If no secondary independent sources are remarking on her longevity, then that "fact" is not DUE on wikipedia no matter how obvious it is.

Also, stop adding info sourced to Instagram, as you did at Princess Elena of Romania. Minor grandchildren's names and dates of birth are not appropriate to include without strong sourcing. JoelleJay (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JoelleJay: Why don't you also apply the discourse of mentioning name and birth to the children of Elisabeta Karina's brother, who were born by 2022 and are young? It doesn't seem to me that there is any problem in simply writing the name and date of birth. Or at least, consistency dictates that this rule also be applied to her brother's children, or is she a special case? Also, what you don't identify as "strong sourcing" was reported in the official Instagram account of the Romanian Royal House, and that was the link to the page. There is no more important source than this. Check it out, and tell me if the link has any errors, but it's the official page of the royal family, so there's little to discuss.

MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma (talk) 19:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have all the royalty pages watchlisted, but if non-notable children's names are being listed elsewhere then those should also be deleted. Read BLPNAME. The official Instagram account of the former royal family is not RS and should not fall under the WP:SELFSOURCE exceptions. It should really only ever be used for simple ABOUTSELF info on adult family members who have consented to having their activities publicized. As it's also a primary, non-independent source it has no impact on whether particular content is DUE. JoelleJay (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Tsuguko of Takamado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minato.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]