User talk:Markandraos1
This is Markandraos1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wiise Software (January 16)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wiise Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wiise Software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Markandraos1!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
|
Editing with a possible paid conflict of interest
[edit]Hello Markandraos1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Markandraos1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Markandraos1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --SamHolt6 (talk) 01:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
I am not paid for this article. I am trying to get it published so can you please assist me with what else I need to? Markandraos1 (talk) 03:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Markandraos1: ok. Do you have any potential conflict of interest (WP:COI) in regards to Wiise? SamHolt6 (talk) 15:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
No potential conflict of interest. Markandraos1 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Well, that straight-up isn't true. Yunshui 雲水 09:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Yunshui 雲水 09:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)