User talk:Martial Law

This user may have left Wikipedia. Martial Law has not edited Wikipedia since 3 June 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Martial Laws Archives

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User:Martial Law/archive 1. Sections without timestamps are not archived

User talk:AkiKimura99

This guy has awarded themself a barnstar and signed your name to it. Corvus cornix_talk 05:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley :)

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

--Unionhawk (talk) 04:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Man in Black picture!

Hey, go to the Discussion tab on the Men in Black article (concept, not movie) and look at my posts. I have links to the picture you so seek and archives of the article from the Wayback Machine going back to 2004. Coffee4binky (talk) 19:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Glenn Spencer

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Glenn Spencer. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Spencer. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fictional resistance movements and groups

The article Fictional resistance movements and groups has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced fancruft, no out-of-universe notability, tough to source

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fictional resistance movements and groups for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fictional resistance movements and groups is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional resistance movements and groups until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National UFO Reporting Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National UFO Reporting Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National UFO Reporting Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alien and Paranormal Creatures listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alien and Paranormal Creatures. Since you had some involvement with the Alien and Paranormal Creatures redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]