User talk:Mary Ann Magadia

Hello, Mary Ann Magadia, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jesus Felipe

Hello Mary Ann Magadia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jesus Felipe for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Imahesh3847 (talk) 09:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mary Ann Magadia! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:49, Wednesday, August 24, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesus Felipe (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Jesus Felipe, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is better than the version in draft space. If you want this draft considered, please tag the version in draft space for deletion so that this version can be moved to draft space and reviewed. This draft has external links in the article body. They are not permitted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mary Ann Magadia/sandbox/Jesus Felipe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mary Ann Magadia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Required disclosure

Please take a moment to read the Terms of Use, particularly the part on "paid editing without disclosure", and make sure that you comply with the disclosure requirements noted there. The easiest way to do so is to add a note that gives your employer, affiliation and client to your user page. Huon (talk) 01:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesus Felipe (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See previous comment about tone. This draft appears to be a mixture of a biographical article about Felipe and critiques of economic theories about which he has written critiques. Present his work neutrally.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesus Felipe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesus Felipe (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The PRIMARY references are the only ones that talk about Felipe in any detail. However, such references do nothing to demonstrate notability. Everything else is just a business listing or a review of his book. There are large sections of text that have no references; this must be fixed. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesus Felipe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 03:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jesus Felipe

Hello, Mary Ann Magadia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jesus Felipe".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting forever for response from DDG

While you were at IRC, we didn't notice that there is no active user named DDG. If there is an account by that name, they have never edited anything on the English Wikipedia. I guess that explains why you were not getting a response.

You'll need to follow the instructions given above to get your draft re-instated if you wish to continue to work on it. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:10, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the reason you have been waiting is that my name is DGG, and Itherefore didn;t see the notice. I'll now take a look at your draft. DGG ( talk ) 01:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The key problem is that it reads as essentially a promotion for his book. I am not sure whether or not he is notable--the criteria are WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. For both ,we normally expect two major books , not just one. I notice the book is hel din only about 100 libraries, so the statement of how authoritative it is is not all that convincing--thecomments by economists arecited from promotional material for the book--they need to be found in formal published reviews in major economics journals. If you try again, remove expressions of praise or importance. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC) .[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesus Felipe (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Formatting also needs to be worked on, and the long quotes need to be condensed or removed and more to the point.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesus Felipe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jesus Felipe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jesus Felipe, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]