User talk:Masur
Welcome!
Hello, Masur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! - Beax 19:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC) (skoro tak bardzo kciałeś być przywitany....)
Categorization
[edit]On en-wiki you can find examples like this en:Category:Libraries or this en:Category:Sculpture. Is it bad way of categorization? En-wiki is most important project for everybody. Do not say no. By the way some things are better on de-wiki (f.e. Categorization), some on fr-wiki, but what we can say about other wiki's? I several times on the talk pages of ru-wiki, it-wiki and xx-wiki red this:
- "In en wiki la data di morte è diversa: è accreditata la morte del 1867" (at the article Constantine Simonides) - this Utente is right, of course, but why he did not examined sources of the en-wiki's article? ("en-wiki has")
- Вызывает сомнение правильность перевода названия статьи (в англ.вики — «Uncial 066») - as you see this Участник cannot think indepedently ("en-wiki has").
I can give you more examples, but it will only wasting of my time. Met hartelijke groeten. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 05:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Strain 121
[edit]I'm sorry. I use broken English.
The source that I used is "Growth of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms on a ferruginous smectite as the sole electron acceptor".
--Krclathrate (talk) 14:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
OTRS tickets
[edit]Hi, thanks for helping out with OTRS tagging. Here, we use {{permissionOTRS|id=2009089999999999}} rather than {{OTRS-talk}}. Stifle (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Bonjour Masur !
[edit]Mitica-Misha, un collègue moldave, me prie de vous préciser que mon contrat avec le fr:Muséum national d'histoire naturelle de Paris me laisse l'entière maîtrise des documents que j'ai produits pour eux (dessins de dinosaures, panneaux d'indentification des animaux de la Ménagerie et du Zoo de Vincennes, cartes, plans, schémas de plantes, graphiques, etc.). De leur côté, ils s'engageaient à ne les utiliser qu'à titre gratuit. Il est possible que je vous scanne ce contrat et vous l'envoie à une adresse mail si vous le désirez. Concernant les fonds satellitaires des cartes de la Moldavie, je crois que l'idée d'imiter le style graphique d'Earth Google (frontieres en jaune, ville en points rouges à liséré blanc) est mauvaise car cela fait peser sur ces cartes le soupçon d'être prises à Google. Il faut un oeil attentif pour voir les différences...
Cordialement,--Spiridon 83.113.250.71 Manoliu (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC) (fr:Utilisateur:Spiridon Ion Cepleanu)
Dyskusja
[edit]Prosiłbym, abyś nie komentował każdej opinii innych osób jak to robisz bo to zwykły trolling. Każdy ma swoje racje i każdy może napisać co chce i nikt nikomu nie musi wyjaśniać swojego wyboru. LUCPOL (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Bitwa warszawska
[edit]Tak to jest jak się paranoicy zabierają za zmienianie opisów grafik tak, że w końcu nic się z nich nie da odczytać. A najważniejsza informacja tu jest taka, że ja tylko wgrałem grafikę z polskiej wiki i skopiowałem opis, nie pamiętam już kto wgrał ją tamże, ale to z nim się kontaktuj, bo to on skanował. Ech, jeszcze jeden powód, by dać sobie spokój z wikipedią. Pozdr. //Halibutt 21:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Black spot
[edit]http://imgur.com/xGAux - but I can't comment on your pl-wiki page because my entire ISP is range-blocked there. Marnanel (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- It's on page 20, after "black ship" and before "black squall". Marnanel (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Removing "S_cerevisiae_septins.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by Masur because: No permission since 13 February 2011.
[edit]Hi Masur,
apparently, you deleted the file S_cerevisiae_septins.jpg from Commons. The reason: no permissions since 13 February 2011. I am the molecular biologist who created this micrograph and wrote the article about septins. Nobody could possibly hold more rights concerning this picture than myself. By deleting it (without asking permission from me, informing me in any way or giving me more time to react than 13 days), you mutilated my article. Please undo that immediately!
Thank you! - spitfire — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spitfire ch (talk • contribs) 20:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for restoring it :-)
- Best regards Spitfire ch (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Copyright question
[edit]Could you look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Radzymin (1920)/archive1 and offer some advice? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 21:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
CD figure
[edit]I think the figure you inserted showing CD spectra is very helpful. I wonder what you would think about also adding the table from the cited article showing the estimated percentages of secondary structure components. I think it would tie in nicely with the paragraph that mentions such analysis. --AJim (talk) 17:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
About an image
[edit]Have you participated in the creation of this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V%28D%29J_recombination-diagram.svg ? If so, please contact me as soon as possible at [email protected]. Regards, "Rhodospirillum". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhodospirillum (talk • contribs) 21:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kai Simons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polymorphism, Lifecycle and University of Leuven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Masur. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Czy mógłbyś ten plik przenieść do commons, bo chcę na plwiki opublikować tłumaczenie artykułu z enwiki i będzie go brakowało jako ilustracji.
Jatentaki (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Masur. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Masur. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)