User talk:Mbonaccors

Lodro Rinzler's Page

I am a relatively inexperienced, new editor, so I feel like your aspersions on Lodro Rinzler's talk page are strange and ad hominem. I don't know what to do at this point, because it seems like you will keep changing Lodro Rinzler no matter what. I am going to just stop editing that page because I really don't care that much. Someone else can do it. I just think your actions are suspicious, and your words are not very respectful. I also don't think you are right about the sourcing, but again I will not persevere here. I think you might have a COI given the connection between the subject of the page and your previous edits, which I mentioned on Lodro Rinzler's talk page. If you have questions, you will need to go to the Community Portal and find an experienced editor to ask.Champa Chotso (talk) 03:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Oliver Tassinari

A tag has been placed on Oliver Tassinari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Y4kk 18:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Oliver Tassinari. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Y4kk 22:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Oliver Tassinari

A tag has been placed on Oliver Tassinari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Y4kk 22:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oliver_Portrait.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oliver_Portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mbonaccors. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Lodro Rinzler, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lodro Rinzler. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are a single-purpose account whose repeatedly attempts to remove sourced information from the article been rejected by other editors. This is a form of long-term edit-warring that can lead to your account being blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lodro Rinzler, you may be blocked from editing. Three editors on the talk page disagree with you regarding removing the sourced allegations. Please wait for discussion to continue. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Lodro Rinzler. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mbonaccors. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Lodro Rinzler, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not have a conflict of interest [1], where are you getting information about his accuser or the results of the investigation? I'm not finding any publicly-available sources for that type of information. – wallyfromdilbert (talk)