User talk:Mcgill-mcgill

Mcgill-mcgill, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mcgill-mcgill! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elliott Marc Jones

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elliott Marc Jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sarah Cordingley

Hello, Mcgill-mcgill,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sarah Cordingley should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Cordingley .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Nick Moyes (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC) "What we actually find convincing in artists is actually museum collections or major art reviews. SwisterTwister talk 16:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elliott Marc Jones moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Elliott Marc Jones, does not have enough sources as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced from reliable sources should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 18:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elliott Marc Jones has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elliott Marc Jones. Thanks! SweetCanadianMullet 01:31, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Redactem (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redactem (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redactem (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 03:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elliott Marc Jones (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Wolverhampton Herald sources, the only ones differing from the ones discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Marc Jones are insufficient and not substantial enough to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elliott Marc Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elliott M. Jones

The article Elliott M. Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual. Sources cited are low-quality and primarily about a game he developed rather than himself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 09:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Mrmeatboy123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. SmartSE (talk) 10:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elliott Marc Jones concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Elliott Marc Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elliott Marc Jones

Hello, Mcgill-mcgill. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elliott Marc Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]