User talk:Mechengrasim

Welcome!

Hello, Mechengrasim, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shoppingpak, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MordeKyle (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mechengrasim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir i promise i will not use anything about it again and basically i am trying to add different famous places of my city and information about their history and their current aims. the first thing i tried was shoppingpak market which is near to my house but i don't know wny i am not able to do it. now i will not add that because there are lot of other things which have their history and i can add those but before this i will read all terms of conditions to add these things. please do me a favor send me the link where i can find the terms about putting some places and their information and history. thank you Mechengrasim (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please have only a single unblock request open at any one time. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Shoppingpak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shoppingpak, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MordeKyle (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shoppingpak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shoppingpak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Pakistani clothing. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 02:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mechengrasim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir i will never ever edit any page again untill i have complete knowledge about editing. please unblock my account it is a request. Mechengrasim (talk) 17:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but if you do not understand why your past edits were problematic, you are not ready to edit Wikipedia. You are welcome to make a new unblock request when you understand the problems that led to this block; before then you cannot avoid repeating them. Huon (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

All you have done since you have been here is try to promote Shoppingpak, either by writing promotional articles about it or adding mentions of it or links to it in other articles. To be unblocked, you would need to promise us you will stop doing that and not write anything about Shoppingpak again. Also, I think you would need to tell us what you want to do here other than that if unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir i promise i will not use anything about it again and basically i am trying to add different famous places of my city and information about their history and their current aims. the first thing i tried was shoppingpak market which is near to my house but i don't know wny i am not able to do it. now i will not add that because there are lot of other things which have their history and i can add those but before this i will read all terms of conditions to add these things. please do me a favor send me the link where i can find the terms about putting some places and their information and history. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechengrasim (talk • contribs)

Please do not make changes to an unblock request after it has been closed. If you want to request unblock again, please make a new request below here and another admin will review it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The very first thing you did here was create an article about Shoppingpak ("Shoppingpak is an online marketplace founded in 2016..."), and when that was deleted you created it again and again (three times in total). For a company to have a Wikipedia article, it must satisfy the notability requirements at WP:NCORP and be supported by multiple reliable sources as described at WP:RS, and something just founded last year is very unlikely to qualify.
After that, you added Shoppingpak to the E-trading in Pakistan article, twice (after having had the first one reverted).
You also added Shoppingpak to Khaur (along with some other "famous places"), though how a web site can be considered a famous place is beyond my understanding.
This does not look to me like "trying to add different famous places of my city", it look like an attempt to promote Shoppingpak, and it has been going on for months.
If you make another unblock request, please tell us whether you have any personal connection with Shoppingpak, or otherwise explain why you have been trying to get it into Wikipedia. Also, you would need to promise not to mention Shoppingpak again anywhere in your edits. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir i understand what are you saying, the shoppingpak is a shopping mall like other shopping malls and there are other places in my city too. the moust famous thing in our city is shoppingpak thats why i was trying to add it. my main consideration on wikipedia is that i want to distribute knowledge among people. i've created some softwares for playstore for information of people too. i will not add shoppingpak again in wikipedia but the famous places i added was 100% real in khaur city as you can check. sir kindly unlock my account and i will take care of multiple reliable sources and notability requirements and sir if i add anything again i will put complete details as per the lawws of wikipedia. sir kindly accept my request, and if you can give me authority to add all famous places including shoppingpak with requirements of wikipedia (notability and multiple reliable sources) i will be very thankful to you & really sorry because before i was not completely understood the requirement of wiki but now i realized. please give me permission to do things with your terms and conditions. i hope you do.

You have not actually said whether you have any personal connection with Shoppingpak. Please do so, in a new unblock request using {{unblock|reason=Your reason here. ~~~~}} and another admin will review it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mechengrasim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir i don't have any personal connection with shoppingpak. kindly allow me to do everything including shoppingpak and famous places of our city and other cities for information and i will do all this by following your terms and conditions of multiple reliable sources and notability requirements, and please revert back the setting of khaur city because all those information i've provided there was 100% genuine and verified. Mechengrasim (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I note your assurance that you have no connection with Shoppingpak and I thank you for that. However, you still wish to write about this mall and that is going to take us inexorably back to the problems we have experienced. In order for me to unblock you I would wish you to agree to a complete topic ban. Such a topic ban would entail no references to Shopingpak anywhere - not in your user space, no article, no mentions in other pages and no links. If you are prepared to agree to a complete topic ban you may do so in a fresh appeal. Just Chilling (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mechengrasim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am agree that, i will not add any no article, no mentions in other pages and no links.about this mall please unblock. Mechengrasim (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I am unblocking you on the basis of your agreement to a complete topic ban on Shoppingpak. Needless to say if you make any reference in any form to this mall then the block will be immediately reimposed. However, I am looking foward to your contributions on other aspects of your city and happy editing! Just Chilling (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]