User talk:Meghapushkarna

Welcome!

Hi Meghapushkarna! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dreamside. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Bruce1ee ^talk 11:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have try to write short "Plot summary" as per Wikipedia suggestions.

Like

Present Long paragraph

"The novel opens in February 1986 with Lee Peterson waking up and going about his daily routine before heading to work. But something is off. Lee takes an egg from the refrigerator and tries to break it into a frying pan. It does not break. He tries again; it wobbles. Lee then wakes up. He begins his routine again only to wake up again. This happens a number of times, like the peeling of one layer of onion off another. Lee calls these occurrences repeaters."

To

Short paragraph

The novel starts with Lee Peterson going through his daily routine, but he experiences a strange phenomenon where he repeatedly wakes up and begins his routine again. He calls these instances "repeaters," and they seem to be peeling off layers of reality like an onion. Meghapushkarna (talk) 11:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 11:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Redshine Publication

The article Redshine Publication has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Redshine Publication for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redshine Publication is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redshine Publication until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are also blocked for abusing multiple accounts, per the investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meghapushkarna. Multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, thank you for giving me the opportunity to express my views. I declare that I have no connection to any organization for any activity on Wikipedia. As well as I also haven't any other accounts on Wikipedia. The similarity between my accounts and those of other accounts is merely coincidental. As a new user, I'm still learning Wikipedia, which is why I got caught up in this controversy. Please unblock me and let me continue my editing journey, I promise not to give you any chance to complain in the future. Meghapushkarna (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ivanvector ,

I extend my sincere appreciation for affording me the privilege to articulate my perspectives. I wish to unequivocally affirm that I maintain no affiliations with any organization in relation to my involvement in Wikipedia activities. Additionally, I assert the absence of any alternate accounts associated with my persona on the Wikipedia platform. Any semblance between my account and others is purely fortuitous.

As a novice user, I am currently in the process of familiarizing myself with the intricacies of Wikipedia, which regrettably led to my inadvertent entanglement in the present controversy. I kindly implore you to consider unblocking my account, allowing me to resume my editorial endeavors. I am committed to ensuring that any future contributions will be in strict adherence to Wikipedia guidelines, and I pledge to address any concerns promptly.

Your understanding and consideration in this matter are immensely appreciated.

Sincerely, Meghapushkarna (talk) 07:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We do not accept block appeals written by AI. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, thank you for giving me the opportunity to express my views. I declare that I have no connection to any organization for any activity on Wikipedia. As well as I also haven't any other accounts on Wikipedia. The similarity between my accounts and those of other accounts is merely coincidental. As a new user, I'm still learning Wikipedia, which is why I got caught up in this controversy. Please unblock me and let me continue my editing journey, I promise not to give you any chance to complain in the future. Meghapushkarna (talk) 12:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]