User talk:Metikatic

This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Minnesota_-_Twin_Cities/EEB_4611-Biogeochemical_Processes-Spring_2022_(Spring_semester) .

Welcome!

Hello, Metikatic, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will we ever be unblocked or what exactly do we have to do for that? Metikatic (talk) 00:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm ThatIPEditor. I noticed that in this edit to Coral bleaching, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThatIPEditor ^{Talk · Contribs} 18:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coral bleaching, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 18:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coral bleaching, you may be blocked from editing. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coral bleaching. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 19:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing including violations of the copyright policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cotne002:: Ensuring you are aware of this block as it effects one of your students.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict) I'll add @Ian (Wiki Ed) and Helaine (Wiki Ed). Metikatic, you have to start communicating with other editors; repeatedly reinstating contested content is particularly problematic. And while the copyrighted content that that ToBeFree is referring to is compatibly licensed, it is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia in an unmodified form, and the license in question (CC BY 4.0) also requires that you clearly attribute where the content is from. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  (just for the record, additional deleted content had been submitted to User:Starfruit101/Coral bleaching) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Thanks, hadn't noticed that page – those sources are indeed not all compatibly licensed. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Thanks @Blablubbs and @ToBeFree (and everyone else). I just got the notification of the block and was digging through their contribs & deleted contribs. I'm going to email the instructor now. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Coral bleaching. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Metikatic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

we are all new to using wiki for our class assignment and we have an assignment due and we need it to be unblocked and restore our sandbox. Thank you for understanding from now on we will follow the guidelines after this mistake Metikatic (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

You were given more than enough warnings that your editing was unacceptable, uncluding twice being warned that continuing to act in the same way would lead to being blocked from editing. You chose to ignore those warnings. Your unblock request makes no attempt to address the reasons for the block. You use the word "mistake", but you knew what you were doing. Moreover, the one place where you have tried to describe the reason for the block, namely the paragraph beginning "All this mishap..." , far from showing that you understand the reasons for the block and will not do the same again, unequivocally shows that you don't understand the reason. All that is not going to be set aside in order to help you achieve an aim of your own, unrelated to benefitting the encyclopaedia. I suggest you re-read the guide to appealling blocks (assuming you did read it before posting an unblock request). JBW (talk) 07:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed the request formatting. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An unblock request that so clearly displays a lack of discussion of the issues with an instructor should probably be declined. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually we talked to our instructor and we were instructed to follow direction. Metikatic (talk) 21:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If the above unblock request is the result of instructions, the instructions have been insufficient. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All this mishap was due to the problem of us trying to post our sandbox into our main space and we were just trying to copy and past that into the main article, which introduced the problem. We didn't know how to do that and after talking to our instructor we were told to do copy and paste since one of our other classmate tried that and it worked to get it on the main space. Metikatic (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Metikatic, the sandbox was deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, so your editing in the main article was merely part of a larger problem that is not being addressed in your current request. That aside, though, the editing in the main article was highly chaotic, as you may notice when having a look at the revision history of the page. Other editors have attempted to contact you about their concerns, but their messages remained unanswered without a change in the criticized behavior. And even that aside, your plagiarism is unaddressed by the request. The main argument you currently provide for unblocking is your assignment being due, which is a personal problem instead of a credible demonstration of understanding of the actual problems. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So should we make another appeal? Metikatic (talk) 22:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You use the words "we", "our", and "us". Does that mean this account is shared by more than one person? JBW (talk) 07:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I meant we because we are working in group and that person has also been denied access to the sandbox draft. We were also told by our instructor to add the changes we made to our draft and add it to the talk page. We have gone through our material to edit out an anything that is not appropriate and anything that might have copyright infringements. We have condensed the Potential Solution: Artificial upwelling (AU) text, taken out anything that was unnecessary from the images we used which is found in the context section and the infectious disease section paragraph, as well. Metikatic (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW looks like they're working on this together with Starfruit101. I believe that's the "we". Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57701

is closed. Thanks, @Ian (Wiki Ed):. @Cotne002: are you there? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have gone through our material to edit out an anything that is not appropriate and anything that might have copyright infringements.Metikatic (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]