User talk:Mfuzia

In response to your feedback

Try asking at the technical village pump. If you have any questions, you can ask on my talk page.

David1217 ^{What I've done} 23:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sky view over FDU's Metropolitan Campus.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sky view over FDU's Metropolitan Campus.png. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ground level view of the New Monninger Center.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ground level view of the New Monninger Center.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fairleigh Dickinson University's College at Florham Devils Logo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fairleigh Dickinson University's College at Florham Devils Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NFIB v. Sebelius

Heads up. --Nstrauss (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Mfuzia,

I did a little follow-up research in light of my previous note about NFIB v. Sebelius, and I now see you're being paid to promote your employer's presence on this site. Per WP:COI and particularly WP:NOPAY this type of activity is highly discouraged by the Wikipedia community. If you and your employer insist on continuing then you should (i) review WP:COI, (ii) disclose your relationship with your employer on your user page and on all relevant talk pages, and (iii) avoid making even slightly controversial edits. (Rather, you should suggest such edits on the talk page and let others make them.)

I see that most of your individual edits appear well-written, legitimate, and non-controversial, but your cumulative changes to your employer's article have a net effect of giving it a self-promotional, "puff-piece" type of flavor. This is arguably in violation of WP:PROMOTION. When you start adding content to other articles to boost your employer's visibility then you are definitely crossing the line. And when you start edit warring with editors who resist you're engaging in sanctionable behavior. Please take my heartfelt advice and tell your boss that Wikipedia doesn't support this type of project and it's time for it to come to an end.

--Nstrauss (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

In light of this discussion I'll give you 24 hours to undo this edit before I request administrative sanctions for disruptive editing and conflict of interest. Stop now and take a deep breath before you shoot yourself in the foot. --Nstrauss (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The thread is Fairleigh Dickinson University. Thank you.

June 2013

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 20:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of section headings

Hello, please review MOS:HEAD. Only the first letter of the first word in section headings should be capitalized. Thank you — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mfuzia. You have new messages at MusikAnimal's talk page.
Message added 17:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— MusikAnimal ^talk 17:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The ANI thread is at WP:ANI#Request for administrator at WP:COIN. What is probably the same issue is being discussed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Fairleigh Dickinson University. User:DGG has proposed that you be blocked from editing. There may still be time for you to respond there. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing discussion at WP:COIN

At Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Fairleigh Dickinson University it has been noted that on July 1 you were continuing to expand a list of fraternities at Fairleigh Dickinson University that may violate WP:NOTDIR. You have continued to add non-notable material contrary to our usual article standards. It does not benefit the reputation of the FDU to have less-important fluff added. Consider responding at COIN and agreeing to follow our policy. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Fairleigh Dickinson University and PublicMind. Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is continuing at Wikipedia:ANI#Fairleigh Dickinson University and PublicMind. In that thread, one administrator has proposed that you be indefinitely blocked. There may still be time for you to avoid sanctions if you will respond in that thread and agree to follow Wikipedia policy and guidelines regarding COI editing. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DGG ( talk ) 17:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FDU Devils Logo.jpg

The file File:FDU Devils Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]