User talk:Mike Doughney/Archive/Aug-2008
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mike Doughney. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Osteen...
Mike,
Hi. I see where you're coming from on the surface, but a perspective with substance shows that indeed, Joel Osteen does not preach the Bible, though he does make the representation that he does. For me to point out some blatant inaccuracies might seem like a slant, but I'm not making things up.Rnmisback (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Like it says at the top of this page, "If you're not already familiar with Wikipedia policies, particularly those regarding verifiability, neutral point of view and no original research, please consider carefully studying those policies before commenting here. Thanks." Mike Doughney (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Monavie
Hey Mike, sorry about accidentally reverting your deletion of "LLC". I didn't notice that you had deleted it right after I put it in; I thought I just forgot to hit save when my change didn't appear, so I restored it again. Just FYI, I didn't originally put the LLC detail in there but I deleted it accidentally today when I was making some other edits, so I thought I should restore it. That's also why I marked it as a minor edit. But I see your point about it being a peacock term. My intention was just to indicate that it is not a publicaly traded company. How about "privately owned" instead? Rhode Island Red (talk) 06:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
UAA report
I removed your report of JDW1761; the user may have a conflict of interest, and his name may point to that conflict of interest, but there is no actual problem with the name itself. An acronym and a number can't meaningfully be considered a vehicle for promotion. Try the conflict of interest noticeboard if there's still a problem. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 04:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Faster than a speeding bullet
I just attempted to delete the additions to the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi article. Sheeshe! I looked up and down the article several times wondering If I'd imagined them, then saw you'd just deleted them. Funny timing. Thanks.(olive (talk) 05:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC))