User talk:Mike Mike

Welcome!

Hello, Mike Mike, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yannis Livadas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''At the bookstand of La Manne, 90 Claude Bernard street'' (private edition Paris 20130

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Yannis Livadas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yannis Livadas.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yannis Livadas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''Au comptoir de La Manne au 90 rue Claude-Bernard'' (Édition privée Paris 2014]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Yannis Livadas.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Yannis Livadas.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Y. Livadas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Y. Livadas.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Yannis Livadas.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Yannis Livadas.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Yannis Livadas

added links pointing to Robert Duncan, James Wright, Jonathan Williams, Paul Blackburn and Michael Palmer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yannis Livadas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yannis Livadas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yannis Livadas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Woodroar (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Yannis Livadas. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 13:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All the facts in the page are real and official. Please check again and let me know.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Mike (talk • contribs) 13:45, 22 February 2016‎

All facts on Wikipedia should be referenced to reliable, third-party published sources, not to our own original research or personal opinion, especially when they concern living persons. I did look for reliable sources and found none, only sites that copy our content or material written by the subject, which is why I nominated the article for deletion. If you know of reliable sources that we can use–see WP:IRS for examples–feel free to add them to the article. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 14:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yannis Livadas could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 14:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 14:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. DMacks (talk) 14:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mike Mike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Mike Mike (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your disagreement about these sources will not be discussed with you while your legal threat is outstanding, and no unblock request will be considered until either your threatened legal action is complete or is unequivocally withdrawn. Please read WP:NLT before you consider making a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear friend please give me a serious answer concerning the reliability of the Official Greek Authors Data Page and the rest of the links. if you consider them unofficial or ilegal please make an also official report in order to set the whole situation right. That is, send me a report page in order to send it to them asking them to prove their reliability. Yet, if you believe that i have intentionally provide false facts without the slightest proof by your side, then i i will have nothing more to say in terms of juman logic. Best regards.

P.S. At least you can translate in english the facts about the author from the his link in the Official Greek Authors Data Page: http://www.biblionet.gr/author/45330/%CE%93%CE%B9%CE%AC%CE%BD%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%82_%CE%9B%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%B4%CE%AC%CF%82

Mike Mike, it's not a human right to be included in Wikipedia, and it's not a personal attack to have one's article deleted. There's absolutely no law anywhere that could force Wikipedia to keep an entry on a specific person. HandsomeFella (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course. Yet an official bibliography proves more than any intentionally or not uploaded article anywhere on the internet. I am talking about facts, nothing else. This is a raw offence of bibliographical facts and of a human presence. This is the matter, nothing else. And nothing else will ever be. I believe that i am clear and definite.

At least drop me a message when you will delete this article for good.

Best regards.

This matter will NOT be discussed with you until either your threatened legal action is complete, or is unequivocally withdrawn. Please read WP:NLT for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do mean by "completing" my legal action? The legal reference had to do and has to do with Wikipedia itself! Wikipedia is to protect what i stand for as a contributor. Or not? What is misunderstood here, sir? Since i received a brutal deleting by a totally unknown person, a third party that is, i had the obligation to refer to the legal protection that Wikipedia provides, or not? Since i am not the one who stands against it, but the guy who rather intentionally deleted the facts from this specific article. So please do not twist my statement. If Wikipedia will not protect me against this guy; that proves that i am not free to contribute based on reliable facts and bibiography. Does someone miss the point here? Or what? This must be cleared and solved. I am looking forward a definite reply. Best.

You said, specifically, "i will be forced to appeal with every legal right and force to press charges". "Legal right" and "press charges", in English, are terms which apply to actual criminal or civil law (as opposed to pursuing Wikipedia's rules or dispute resolution process), and when you use those terms you fall foul of WP:NLT policy. If what you meant was only that you will pursue Wikipedia's dispute resolution process and not seek redress under criminal or civil law, then please make a new unblock request making that clear, and confirm that you will not use terms like "legal" and "charges" in future discussions, and another admin will review your request. I know it's frustrating having an article nominated for deletion (it's happened to me), but it is important to respond in a calm way and try to achieve consensus and not make it sound like you are making actual legal threats. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you truly. Best.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mike Mike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ι only ment that i will pursue Wikipedia's dispute resolution process and not seek redress under criminal or civil law, that is, i confirm that i will not use terms like "legal" and "charges" in future discussions.

Accept reason:

OK, I've unblock your account. Please be aware that consensus at the deletion discussion is the first step. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I undertand. Thank you.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mike Mike, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Woodroar (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]